Cases

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge. Robert Figueroa (“Plaintiff’) brought a complaint against Jeh Johnson as the Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“Defendant”) alleging discrimination and retaliation on the basis of his male sex or gender and Hispanic national origin as well as a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rig

COHEN, J., concurring specially. The trial judge in this ease was called upon to discern the motives of competing physician groups engaged in a very personal and very public dispute. The issue that was before the trial court and is, in turn, before this Court is whether statements made at two meetings were privileged under Florida’s statutory protection for peer review proceedings. The events that led’ up

González, J ¶ 1 Washington law extends work product protection to statements made by an insured to an insurer following an accident in light of the specific parties involved and the expectations of those parties. We must decide if that protection applies here, where the insured has gained the status of insured by statute, rather than by contract. We hold it does. We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the

ORDER In July 2011, Mexican law enforcement authorities filed a diplomatic note with the United States Secretary of State requesting the extradition of Jesus Guardado-Figueroa to stand trial for the aggravated homicide of a victim alleged to be his wife’s lover. In May 2012, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois filed a complaint for extradition. Figueroa was arrested and a hearing on the complaint for extradi

OPINION VIGIL, Judge. This case requires us to examine whether an arbitration agreement that a nursing home requires to be signed as a condition of admission is substantively unconscionable. Agreeing with the district court that the agreement is unfairly and unreasonably one-sided in favor of the nursing home, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND

PER CURIAM: Bernardo Figueroa appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fiqueroa v. Grant, No. CA-03-609 (E.D.Va. May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material

771 F.Supp.2d 207 (2011) Myrna GAUD-FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Case No. 3:09-CV-1530 (JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 14, 2011. *210 Marc J. Ubaldi, Kennedy, Johnson, D'Elia & Gillooly, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff. Michael H. Bernstein, Se

96 F.Supp.2d 256 (1999) Carlos FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. Leonard PORTUONDO, Superintendent Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 97 Civ. 2920(AKH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 10, 1999. *257 *258 Norman L. Reimer & Susan J. Walsh, Gould, Reimer & Go

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Richard Figueroa climbed the ranks of the Foreign Service for 23 years. But in 2009, after he did not receive one of a limited number of competitively-awarded promotions to the next level, Figueroa was forced into mandatory retirement and filed suit, alleging that the State Department denied him the promotion because he is Hispanic. Proceeding pro se, he advances claims u

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its September 4, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted. Review of the issues raised in the Respondent's answer to the petition f

888 P.2d 381 (1995) 126 Idaho 602 Thomas D. FIGUEROA, Claimant-Appellant, v. ASARCO, INC., Employer and American Smelting & Refining Company, Surety, Defendants-Respondents. No. 20879. Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur D'Alene, October 1994 Term. January 6, 1995. Bennett & Ireland, P.A., Coeur d'Alene, for appellant. Hull, Hull &am;

WALLACE, Chief Judge, concurring: I concur in part I of the opinion and in the result reached in part II. I write separately to emphasize two points. First, as the majority correctly holds in part II.C., as of 1987, Figueroa did not have a clearly established right to be free from danger, unless a government official took some affirmative action to interfere with his physical liberty.

JUSTICE ZWICK delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs instituted this action seeking recovery for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligent medical treatment rendered by defendant to Cecilia Figueroa. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Illinois Masonic Medical Center, finding

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO FERNANDO NAVARRO-FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent. No. 2 CA-SA 2025-0028 Filed August 25, 2025 Special Action Proceeding

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: We consider here whether defendants-appellees are, as the District Court determined, entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff-appellant’s claims for false arrest, excessive force, assault, failure to intervene, and unlawful entry. We conclude that defendants-appellees are entitled to the protection of qualified immunity with respect

14‐4116‐cv Figueroa v. Mazza et al. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2015 No. 14‐4116‐cv ELI SAMUEL FIGUEROA, A/K/A ELI SAMUEL, Plaintiff‐Appellant,

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge | Appellant Lazaro Veneros-Figueroa appeals after he was convicted by a Sevier County jury of one count of rape. He was sentenced to serve a total of 360 months in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred by allowing L.S. to testify when she was not competent. We affirm. <

MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction.485 II. Facts.486 III. Jury Verdict.487 IV. Law. .487 A. Judgment as a Matter of Law Standard.487 1. Timely Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) Motion .487 2. “Untimely” Fed.R.

People ex rel. Figueroa v Keyser (2021 NY Slip Op 02035) People ex rel. Figueroa v Keyser 2021 NY Slip Op 02035 Decided on April 1, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 144 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document DIVISION III 2023.06.23 10:40:37 -05'00' No. CR-20-141 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered: March 31, 2021 LAZARO VENEROS-FIGUEROA APPEAL FROM THE SEVIER APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT