⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Finney v. Bibb County Schools”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007-08-17 · Published · cited 546× · 495 F.3d 1306; 12 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1422; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19575; 2007 WL 2332506
495 F.3d 1306 (2007) Alicia ALLEN, Barbara Andrews, Melissa Braxton, Patricia Brown, Shirley Brown, Carolyn Finney, Norarene Gilbert, Veronica Jackson, Vera Long, James Mays, Sylvia Pettigrew, Earline Scott, Larose Smith, Patricia Stewart, Eleanor Welch, Essie Williams, Dorothy Woodford, et al., All individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION FOR BIBB COUNTY, Defe
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
02/26/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 10, 2024 Session LAGINA SCOTT v. SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-19-0492 Jim Kyle, Chancellor ___________________________________
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005-07-13 · Published · cited 16× · 618 S.E.2d 642; 274 Ga. App. 776; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 2501; 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 770
618 S.E.2d 642 (2005) 274 Ga. App. 776 WALLACE v. GREENE COUNTY et al. No. A05A0754. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 13, 2005. Reconsideration Denied July 28, 2005. Certiorari Denied November 7, 2005. *644 Francis N. Ford, Adams & Ford, Eatonton, for appellant. <
District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1982-09-10 · Published · cited 10× · 548 F. Supp. 875; 7 Educ. L. Rep. 109; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16193
548 F.Supp. 875 (1982) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-578-H. United States District Court, S. D. Alabama, N. D. September 10, 1982. *876 W. A. Kimbrough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., J. Gerald Hebert and Ellen M. Weber, Voting Section, Civ. Rights Div., Dept
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2025-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 912 S.E.2d 618; 321 Ga. 266
321 Ga. 266 FINAL COPY S24C1320. ATLANTIC GAMES, INC. v. GEORGIA LOTTERY CORPORATION. ORDER OF THE COURT. The Supreme Court today denied the petition for certiorari in this case. All the Justices concur. PETERSON, Presiding Justice, concurring. I concur in the Court’s denial of certiorari in this case. Atlantic Games argues that the General Assembly’s delegation of rulemaking authority to the Georgia Lotte
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996-03-25 · Published · cited 99× · 468 S.E.2d 861; 321 S.C. 426; 1996 S.C. LEXIS 42
468 S.E.2d 861 (1996) William A. BYRD, Sr., as Guardian for William A. Byrd, Jr., A Minor Under the Age of Eighteen (18), Appellant, v. IRMO HIGH SCHOOL and Lexington School District 5 of Lexington and Richland Counties, Respondents. No. 24399. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 1, 1995. Decided March 25, 1996. Rehearing Denied Apr
Jackson v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 791 So. 2d 979; 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
LONG, Presiding Judge. The appellant, Jeremiah Jackson, was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree. See § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. The jury, by a vote of 10-2, recommended that Jackson be sentenced to death. The trial court accepted the jury’s recommendation and sentenced Jackson to death.
Jackson v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000-03-31 · Published · cited 91× · 791 So. 2d 979; 2000 WL 337507
791 So.2d 979 (2000) Jeremiah JACKSON v. STATE. CR-97-0998. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. March 31, 2000. Rehearing Denied June 2, 2000. *989 Shirley Trivett Chapin, Tuscaloosa; and Ellen L. Wiesner, Brookfield, Wisconsin, for appellant. Bill Pryor, atty. gen.; and Jeremy W. Armstrong and James R.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977-10-12 · Published · cited 5× · 563 F.2d 1121
WINTER, Circuit Judge: The question we must decide is whether the Attorney General of the United States, without specific statutory authorization, has the right to bring suit on behalf of the United States against three state officials, responsible for the operation of a state hospital for the confinement and treatment of mentally retarded persons, to redress the alleged deprivation of Eighth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amend
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991-10-31 · Published · cited 134× · 941 F.2d 1449
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: The petitioner, Jimmy Lee Horton, under a sentence of death, appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition. We reverse the district court’s disposition of the case on three of the claims. In doing so, we note that each of the claims constitutes an independent basis for granting the writ. I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE <
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977-10-12 · Published · cited 31× · 563 F.2d 1121; 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11207
563 F.2d 1121 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Dr. Neil SOLOMON, Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene ofthe State of Maryland, Bert W. Schmickel, Director, MentalRetardation Administration, Department of Health and MentalHygiene of the State of Maryland, and Dr. Marvin M.Malcotti, Superintendent, Rosewood State Hospital, Appellees,The National Association for Retarded Citizens, et al., TheState of Texas, The S
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972-09-14 · Published · cited 18× · 268 So. 2d 738; 289 Ala. 458; 77 A.L.R. 3d 1072; 1972 Ala. LEXIS 1087
268 So.2d 738 (1972) Beatrice TAYLOR, individually and also on behalf of and for the use and benefit of all other persons similarly situated v. MAJOR FINANCE COMPANY, INC., a corporation, et al. 6 Div. 899. Supreme Court of Alabama. September 14, 1972. Rehearing Denied November 9, 1972. *740 Harry B. Cohen, Birmi
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1851-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 7 Gratt. 425
DANIEL, J. The judgment upon which the decree sought to be reversed is founded, was rendered in the year 1802. No steps appear to have been taken to enforce the judgment until the institution of this suit in the year 1840. Thomas Smith the intestate of the appellant William P. Smith, in his answer to the bill, set up two defences, to wit, the statute of limitations, and the presumption of satisfaction arising