Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “First National Bank v. Walker”
Matos v. First National Bankpublic domain
Kenton-Walker, Janet, J. The Plaintiff, Obeilson R. Matos, (“the Plaintiff’), commenced this action against First Franklin National Bank (“First Franklin”) and its affiliates National City Bank (“National City”), PNC Financial Services Group (“PNC”), and Home Loan Services, Inc. (“Home Loan Services”) (collectively “the Defendants”), alleging unfair and predatory lending practices relating to a mortgage for the property on 6 Ear
ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Evans v. First National Bank of Jasperpublic domain
Nora Evans appeals from a summary judgment in favor of First National Bank of Jasper ("the Bank") in an action on a promissory note and security agreement. We reverse and remand. On April 25, 1997, Evans purchased a vehicle from Carl Cannon Chevrolet Olds-mobile, Inc. ("Cannon"), pursuant to a retail installment contract and security agreement ("the contract"). That same day, Cannon assigned the contract to the Bank. On January 17, 2002, the Bank sued Evans, alleging a breach-o
BENTON, Circuit Judge. First Tennessee Bank National Association is a trustee of Gregg family trusts. First Tennessee (and members of the Gregg family) sued Pathfinder Exploration, LLC (and its assignees) for breaching an oil and gas lease. The district court 1 granted Pathfinder summary judgment. First Tennessee appeals.
Villarreal v. First Presidio Bankpublic domain
KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendants' First Presidio Bank, and its Successor-in-Interest, Big Bends Banks National Association, D/B/A The Marfa National Bank ("Defendants" or "the Bank") Motion for Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(c) ("Motion"), ECF No. 86, made orally following the close of Plaintiff Roberto Villarreal's case in chief at trial on June 13,
Robertson v. First Union National Bankpublic domain
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS. PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Robertson v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 350 S.C. 339, *192565 S.E.2d 309 (Ct.App.2002). After careful consideration, we dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted. DISMISSED.
Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A.public domain
Syllabus by the Court 1. Minn.Stat. § 336.3-037(b) (2004) (section 3-307(b) of the Uniform Commercial Code) and its accompanying statute of limitations, apply to claims against a payor bank for honoring checks fraudulently written by a fiduciary. 2. Where the Uniform Commerical Code Article 3 applies to breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims, it preempts common law bases for recovery. 3. Where an answer indicates a statute of limitations defense is rai
Savory v. First Union National Bank of Delawarepublic domain
SMITH, Chief Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. This case comes to this Court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Leflore County by the plaintiff, Brenda Savory. Savory claims that she was defrauded by First Union National Bank of Delaware (hereinafter “First Union”) and mortgage brokers John Emory and Joni Goss, doing business as Mississippi Mortgage Corporation (“Mississippi Mortgage”), while she was obtaining a loan with First
Robertson v. First Union National Bankpublic domain
350 S.C. 339 (2002) 565 S.E.2d 309 Willie ROBERTSON, Raymond Brown and Richard Pinckney, individually, and d/b/a Hollywood Financial Enterprises, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, formerly known as First Union National Bank of South Carolina, and Atlantic Appraisals, Respondents, v. United States of America by and through its agency, The Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service, South Carolina
346 S.C. 462 (2001) 551 S.E.2d 301 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff, v. FIRST CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Bruce Beach, d/b/a Cars Unlimited, Jay Crull, d/b/a Lowcountry Auto Sales; and Carl Maxfield and Toni Maxfield, d/b/a TLM Cars, Inc., Third-Party Defendants, Of Whom First Union National Bank, First Citizens Bank and Trust Company of South Carolina,
First Southern National Bank v. Sunnyslope Housing Ltd. Partnership (In re Sunnyslope Housing Ltd. Partnership)public domain
ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
OFFISS, Inc. v. First Union National Bankpublic domain
WALKER, Judge. Plaintiff OFFISS, Inc. (OFFISS) initiated this action on 1 October 1999 against defendant First Union National Bank (First Union) asserting claims for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, breach of contract, and unfair and deceptive trade practices.1 First Union answered denying liability and asserting affirmative defenses of waiver, estoppel, and laches. First Union als
Fleming v. First National Bank of Commercepublic domain
|,WALTZER, Judge. Dorian Fleming, Jr. appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his suit against First National Bank and Commerce, now Bank One, and dismissing the majority of his claims against the law firm of Chaffe,, McCall, Phillips, Toler and Sar-py. Chaffe, McCall answered the appeal asking this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court awarding Fleming $9,705.04. STATEMENT OF THE CA
Miller, Judge. {¶ 1} We are presented with an attorney fee dispute between two law firms stemming from their successful efforts on behalf of mass tort claimants. The Powell Law Group ("PLG") appeals from the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Montgomery, McCraken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, ("MMWR") declaring that MMWR is entitled to an attorney's charging lien in the
Walker v. First National Bankpublic domain
Birdsong, Judge. Vivian Walker brings this appeal seeking to set aside an ex parte order of the court below granting the appellee, the First National Bank of Cobb County, a fi. fa. to effect a monetary recovery based upon a jury verdict. The facts show that the appellee bank filed a notice of foreclosure upon two Cadillac automobiles which Ms. Walker had pledged as collateral for a security agreement. After
Rel: February 28, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER T
Rel: October 11, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TE
GREENE, Judge. First Union National Bank (Bank) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying the relief requested in its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. *130The evidence before the trial court, which is not in dispute, reveals that on 9 November 1994, W. Lin Cobb and Breta Cobb (the Cobbs) gave a deed of trust to Bank encumbering Lot 8,
D. Craig Walker v. America Express National Bankpublic domain
AFFIRM; Opinion Filed November 30, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01185-CV D. CRAIG WALKER, Appellant V. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
First Commonwealth Corp. v. Hibernia National Bankpublic domain
ORDER AND REASONS JONES, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff First Commonwealth Corporation’s “Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Memorandum in Support.” Having reviewed the record in this matter, the evidence presented at trial and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the motion. Background This matter was tried before a jury previously. A