Cases

995 F.Supp. 1122 (1998) Lois DRAPER, Plaintiff, v. ASTORIA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1C, et al., Defendants. No. 97-354-MA. United States District Court, D. Oregon. February 12, 1998. *1123 *1124 Steve Brischetto, Portland, OR, for plaintiff. Thomas S. Moore and Stefan W. Farr, Portland, OR,

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

717 F.Supp.2d 965 (2010) Buckley H. CRISPIN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN AUDIGIER, INC., a California corporation; Nervous Tattoo, Inc., a California corporation, Shop on Stage, Inc., a California corporation, Christian Audigier, an individual; 3A Watch, LLC, a California limited liability company, Radiance Jewelry, Inc., a California corporation; Chromebones, a business entity of unknown form, Revolution Eyewear, Inc., a California co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 09-02030 (CKK) v. PAUL DAVID GAUBATZ, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 24, 2011) Plaintiffs Council

793 F.Supp.2d 311 (2011) COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Paul David GAUBATZ, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-02030 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 24, 2011. *316 Nadhira Al-Khalili, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Bernard S. Grimm, C

Filed 3/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA RG21088725) et al., Defendants and Appellants, PROTECT APP-BASED DRI

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 18-3659 & 19-1146 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner, and LOCAL 743, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 18-3659 & 19-1146 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner, and LOCAL 743, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,

Filed 4/12/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG21088725) STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

776 F.2d 1187 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2957, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,650 Harry E. BECK, Jr.; Doris R. Ambrose; Jacqueline S.Brandon; Mary Anna Cox; Sally B. DiMauro; Rue T.F.Downey; Kathleen A. Heil; John J. Hurley; HarriettLipschultz; Clay B. Lutz; Barbara McGaughey; Roland R.Merkle; Ethel T. Merryman; Doris J. Morrow; Marion F.Northrop; Frances M. Philips; Vivian Reedy; Barbara A.Russell;

241 F.Supp.2d 727 (2002) Livia I. GUILLERMETY, Glenn D. Edgmon and Fiore Botta, Plaintiffs, v. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION OF THE UNITED STATES and Secretary of Treasury of the United States, Defendants. No. 01-CV-74904-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 27, 2002. *728 Jennifer L. Hartke, Pon

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

760 F.2d 454 53 USLW 2568, 24 Ed. Law Rep. 726 Jeremy Scott ADLER, by his Parents and next Friends, Joel A.ADLER and Jane R. Adler, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF the STATE OF NEW YORK, andGordon M. Ambach, Individually and as Commissionerof Education of the State of New York,The Board of Education of the City School District of NewYork, the Subcommittee of the Committee on

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of female bus drivers employed by defendant Board of Education of the Monroe-Woodbury School District (“the District”), have commenced this action for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages, as a result of the District having assigned male bus drivers with less seniority to select routes within the school district. The assignments at issue involved busing male students

OAKES, Circuit Judge: This appeal is yet another in a long line of cases involving what state statute of limitations should be employed in an action pursuant to a federal enactment without its own statute of limitations.1 The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lee P. Gagliardi, Judge, held that this action pursuant to the Education of All Handicapped Chil

606 F.Supp. 1161 (1985) Lucy Peng-Fei CHANG v. UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Diane R. SELEEN, et al. v. BOARD OF REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Sandra KRAYNEK v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Wendy ROWORTH v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, et al. Civ. A. Nos. 77-0070 S, 79-0087 S, 83-0044 S and 83-0099 S

OPINION AND ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Robert Crewe and Robert Maurice, the plaintiffs in this putative class action, bring various state law claims against corporate defendants Rich Dad Education, LLC (“RDE”), Rich Dad Operating Co., LLC (“RDO”), Rich Global, LLC (“RG”), Cash-flow Technologies, Inc., Tigrent Inc. (“IT”), Tigrent Learning Inc. (“TLI”), and Tigrent Brands Inc. (“T

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RESERVING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION PENDING A SUMMARY TRIAL Clark Waddoups, United' States District Judge Sixty-seven plaintiffs1 have sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) for engaging in various unauthorized and fraudulent activities using them p

218 F.Supp.2d 855 (2002) Melvin CHISOLM, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25, Afscme Local 3451 and Willow Run Community School District, and Gayle Green and Peter Silveri, individually, Defendants. No. 01-CV-71312-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 24, 2002. *856