Cases

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

BENNETT, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal of the final order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), No. NY 07528210194 (January 7, 1983), sustaining the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in removing petitioner, Ruby Weston, from her position as an equal opportunity specialist. We affirm. BACKGROUND

32 F.Supp.2d 257 (1998) Bobbie FISHER, Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. No. Civ JFM-96-3460. United States District Court, D. Maryland. May 14, 1998. *258 *259 Bobbie Fisher, Arlington, VA, pro se. Hans Froelicher, IV, Crownsvil

822 F.2d 104 26 ERC 1153, 261 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 56USLW 2017,17 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,043 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., Petitioner,v.U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and Lee M. Thomas,Administrator, U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Respondents,Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Iron & SteelInstitute, Edison Electric Institute, et al., Cincinnati Gas& El

STARR, Circuit Judge: The objective of the Clean Water Act is to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (1982). Under the Act, the discharge of any pollutant into the navigable waters of the United States is unlawful. Id. § 1311(a). This basic rule admits of a critical exception— the discharge of pollutants is permitted if the source obtains a

Memorandum Opinion and Order Elaine E, Bucklo, United States District Judge •In this action, plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenor (to whom I collectively refer as “plaintiffs” unless otherwise specified)1 challenge the constitutionality of a City of Chicago ordinance prohibiting commercial advertising on the interior or exterior of “transportation network vehicles,” i.e., vehic

927 N.E.2d 900 (2010) FOUNDATIONS OF EAST CHICAGO, INC., successor by merger to East Chicago Community Development Foundation, Inc. and Twin City Education Foundation, Inc., Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. CITY OF EAST CHICAGO, Appellee (Defendant below), and State of Indiana, Appellee (Intervenor-Defendant below). No. 49S02-0908-CV-00383. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 18,

FISHER, Circuit Judge. Commenting on the economic calamity that was the South Sea Bubble-in which he lost a considerable fortune-Sir Isaac Newton is said to have remarked, "I can calculate the motions of the heavenly bodies, but not the madness of the people." 1 Throughout its history, the trade of public se

Re: ECF Nos. 121, 133, 134 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Introduction... 1055 II. Procedural History.. .1056 III. Jurisdiction... 1056 IV. Facts... 1056 A. Arrest a

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______ No. 17-2471 ______ CITY OF CAMBRIDGE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, et al. v. ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP; WILLIAM C. ERBEY; KENNETH NAJOUR; ASHISH PANDEY; ROBIN LOW

OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, the attached exhibits, and the relevant statutes and case law, the Court granted the defendant’s motion by Order

405 F.3d 1214 Thomas JOHNSON, Derrick Andre Thomas, Eric Robinson, Adam Hernandez, Kathryn Williams-Carpenter, Jau'Dohn Hicks, John Hanes, in their own right and as representatives of all ex-felon citizens of Florida, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Omali Yeshitela, Plaintiff,v.GOVERNOR OF the STATE OF FLORIDA, Jeb Bush, Secretary of the State of Florida, Katherine Harris, Charlie Crist, Robert Milligan, William Nelson, Robert Crawford, Thomas Ga

598 F.Supp.2d 1 (2009) Neal D. BARNARD, M.D., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1393 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 9, 2009. *2 Daniel Kinburn, Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEAL D. BARNARD, M.D., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-1393 (CKK) v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (February 9, 2009) This is a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) and Privacy A

Filed 6/15/15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S212072 v. ) ) Ct.App. 6 H038563 CITY OF SAN JOSE, )

PER CURIAM. In August 1994, Theodore Wichmann, then 48 years old, was fired from his job at Southern Illinois University (the “University”), a state institution of higher education. Wichmann had been employed by the University for about 20 years and had been promoted to Associate Director of the University’s Touch of Nature Environmental Center (the “Center”) in 1985. His primary

122 F.Supp.2d 932 (2000) Marge KIELCZYNSKI, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF LAGRANGE, ILLINOIS and Loren Clark, Defendants. No. 97 C 8129. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 15, 2000. *933 *934 *935

RULING ON DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN CAMERA MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs, two community groups based in New Haven, filed this action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq., to obtain documents from the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), an investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), following a federa

Opinion PETERSON, P. J. The ultimate legal question presented in this litigation is this: Did the City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board (Board) abuse its discretion, by exceeding the authority and powers imposed by its enabling ordinance, when it adopted new regulations it contends were designed to avoid unconstitutional confiscatory effects on landlords and to ensure landlords fair and reasonable levels of