Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JEREMIAH DIAZ BEAN, No. 69232 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE DEPLif 1' CLERK This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in a d

Opinion DRANGINIS, J. The defendant, Maurice Flanagan, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (1) and 53a-48 (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to suppo

The parties will be styled as in the trial court. The plaintiff, Flanagan, filed suit in the county court of Lubbock county, against defendant, Barton, to recover the sum of $421.50, the price of certain tools, etc., which he alleges he sold to the defendant. On trial before a jury, the court instructed a verdict for the plaintiff and on such verdict rendered judgment for the plaintiff. From this judgment the defendant has appealed. *Page 948 <

Ingraham, J. The testator, among other things in his will, devised to his executors all his real estate, excepting the farm devised to his wife, in trust to receive the rents and profits, and after providing that the same be paid to his wife, and on her death, in part to his daughter during her life, or until a division of the estate should take place as thereinafter provided, directed the executors, from the residue of such proce

Mr. Justice Wolverton, after stating the facts in the foregoing terms, delivered the opinion of the court. 1. The first contention in logical order to be noticed is that the forfeiture was prematurely declared, it being insisted by counsel for the defendant land company that the third payment of 50 per cent of the $49,000 remaining of the purchase price after the payment of the $1,000 was not then due and payab

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge: This case involves a constitutional challenge to the Nassau County Police Department’s policy of confiscating firearms in the course of responding to domestic incidents. Presently before the Court is a motion by the Plaintiff Marc W. Weinstein (the “Plaintiff’ or “Weinstein”), seeking a preliminary injunction preventing, during* th

ARTHUR D. SPATT, United States District Judge In this case, Marc W. Weinstein ("Weinstein" or the "Plaintiff") challenges the constitutionality of the Nassau County Police Department's (the "Department" or "NCPD") policy of confiscating firearms in the course of responding to domestic incidents. On December 10, 2014, the Plaintiff commenced this action against the Department, Acting NCPD Commissioner Thomas Krumpter ("Krumpter"), NC

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

ZACHARY, Judge. *282 William Barry Freedman (appellant) appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing his claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, constructive fraud, and fraud brought against Wayne James Payne and Michael R. Ramos (defendants). On appeal, appellant arg

487 F.Supp.2d 780 (2006) Mary Beth MAHONEY., Plaintiff, v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP, Defendant. No. CIV.A. V-04-41. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Victoria Division. March 21, 2006. *781 *782 *783 *784

ELMORE, Judge. *420 William Barry Freedman (appellant) appeals from the trial court's order dismissing with prejudice his legal malpractice claim. Freedman Farms, Inc. (Freedman Farms) does not appeal from the order. After careful review, we affirm. I. Backgro

[Cite as State v. Garza, 2013-Ohio-5492.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HENRY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 7-13-04 v. TOMAS G. GARZA, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Henry County Common Pleas Court Tria

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal from an order staying a habeas proceeding. We lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal. Mr. Troy Kell sought habeas relief, but he had not exhausted two of his claims in state court. The unexhausted claims created a Catch-22 for Mr. Kell, risking a dismissal of all of his claims without an opportunity to timely refile. To relieve Mr.

Case: 18-1976 Document: 244 Page: 1 Filed: 02/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM (CORK) LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1976, 2018-2023

Dalianis, C.J. The respondent, Ruth Chevion, appeals, and the petitioners, Aaron M. and Katie E. Boissy, cross-appeal, an order of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) granting in part and denying in part the petitioners’ petition to quiet title. The trial court ruled that the respondent lacked an easement to use a certain well on the petitioners’ property, but that she had a deeded right-of-way over the property to access a former

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-IA-00994-SCT HENLEY, LOTTERHOS & HENLEY, PLLC v. AMANDA BRYANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/11/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD A. SMITH TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: THOMAS M. FLANAGAN, JR. J. WALKER STURDIVANT AMANDA B. BARBOUR LA’TOYIA JENESSA SLAY

Case: 18-1976 Document: 244 Page: 1 Filed: 02/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM (CORK) LIMITED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1976, 2018-2023

511 F.3d 203 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Sean GINYARD, Appellant. Nos. 06-3162, 06-3163. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 24, 2007. Decided January 4, 2008. *204 James W. Beane, Jr., appointed by the court, argued the cause and filed the briefs for ap

252 P.3d 1159 (2010) Mark A. HILDEBRAND and Mark L. Hildebrand, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. NEW VISTA HOMES II, LLC, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and Richard M. Reeves, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 08CA2645, 09CA0695. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. November 10, 2010. *1162 Sullan2, Sandgrund, Smi

[Cite as State v. Urdiales, 2015-Ohio-3632.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HENRY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 7-15-03 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROBERTO G. URDIALES, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Henry County Common Pleas Court