Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Gale O’Connell appeals the judgment of the district court affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny O’Connell’s application for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “We review de novo the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of benefits.” Morgan v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 1

O’Connor, J. {¶ 1} The issue before us in this case is one of first impression, wherein we must decide the appropriate procedural steps a defendant must undertake when a plaintiff who brings a medical claim fails to attach an affidavit of merit to the complaint as required by Civ.R. 10(D)(2). {¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellee, Monica Fletcher, would have us find that appellants in this matter should have filed a m

480 S.E.2d 488 (1997) 253 Va. 30 Henry L. FLETCHER, Trustee, et al. v. James N. FLETCHER, Jr. Record No. 960693. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 10, 1997. *489 Dennis I. Belcher (Michele A. W. McKinnon; McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, on briefs), Richmond, for appellants. Daniel M. O'Connell

{¶ 1} Appellant Monica Fletcher claims that the trial court erred by dismissing her wrongful-death claim for failure to attach an affidavit of merit to the complaint as required by Civ.R. 10(D)(2). We remove this case from the accelerated docket, sua sponte, because it presents "a unique issue of law of substantial precedential value in determining similar cases." We have found no appellate cases construing Civ.R. 10(D)(2) or determining the proper procedure for ensuring

OPINION Henry Fletcher was charged by information with the offense of driving while intoxicated, a misdemeanor. On a plea of not guilty, he was convicted in a jury trial and sentenced to fourteen days' confinement and a fine of $500.00. Fletcher appeals, contending that the trial court erred because the charge given to the jury did not comply with Geesa v. State,820 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). Th

383 B.R. 231 (2008) In re ALPHASTAR INSURANCE GROUP LIMITED, et al., Debtors. Richard E. O'Connell, Trustee of the Estates of AlphaStar Insurance Group Limited, et al., Plaintiff, v. Arthur Andersen LLP, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-17903 (SMB), Adversary No. 06-1524. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 19, 2008.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-16-00092-CR IN RE: LARRY THOMAS FLETCHER, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. § ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF §

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00435-CR Terrance M. FLETCHER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

466 So.2d 352 (1985) John K. OLSEN and Barbara H. Olsen, His Wife, Appellants, v. Paul V. O'CONNELL, Philip J. O'Connell and Albert R. Ives, Appellees. No. 84-1123. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 6, 1985. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1985. *353 Walt Logan of Stolba, Logan, Conklin &

550 P.2d 1385 (1976) Robert N. ASHLEY, Appellant, v. William FLETCHER, Respondent. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1976. Decided June 24, 1976. Dean M. Alexander, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kin

Wissell v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc., No. 232-2-12 Cncv (Grearson, J., May 22, 2014) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIV

474 P.2d 329 (1970) Al C. BAHLER Aka Alfred C. Bahler and Roselle Bahler, Dba A.R. John Construction, Appellants and Cross-Respondents, v. John H. FLETCHER and Hazel Joy R. Fletcher, Respondents and Cross-Appellants. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1970. Decided September 11, 1970. Rehearing Denied November 4, 1970. D

246 Or. 362 (1967) 425 P.2d 539 FLETCHER, Appellant, v. WALTERS ET AL, Respondents. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued January 4, 1967. Affirmed March 22, 1967. *363 Nick Chaivoe, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Nels Peterson, Portland. Frederic P. Roehr, Portl

616 So.2d 1201 (1993) Robert K. FLETCHER, Petitioner, v. John C. ANDERSON; Luis J. Ballina; Gerald G. Brauer; Larry C. Carr; Harold C. Hillcher; Philip J. O'Connell; Estate of Edwin D. Barggren; Elnore Barggren, as personal representative of the Estate of Edwin D. Barggren; Elnore Barggren, as trustee of the Edwin D. Barggren and Elnore Barggren Living Trust, a/k/a Edwin D. Barggren and Elnore Barggren Living Trust U/A/D 5/20/80, Respondents.

Orders of dismissal for failure to prosecute entered in the following entitled appeals pursuant to rule X of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Calendar Rules.

90 So.2d 129 (1956) W.A. WHITE, Appellant, v. Leonard L. FLETCHER, Appellee. Supreme Court of Florida. Division B. October 24, 1956. *130 Harris L. Kimball, of the office of J. Russell Hornsby, Orlando, for appellant. M.W. Wells of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appellee. O'CONNELL, Justice. The appellant, W.A. Wh

Aron Steuer, J. Petitioners bring this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of respondent license commissioner which revoked their license. The first question is whether this application should be heard in the first instance at Special Term or transmitted to the Appellate Division. The latter procedure is directed (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296) where the review is of a determination ma

119 A.2d 723 (1955) Albert WOLF v. PRICE-FLETCHER TREE SERVICE. Eq. No. 2362. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. December 30, 1955. George C. Berk, Providence for petitioner. Boss & Conlan; Francis W. Conlan, Providence, for respondent. BAKER, Justice. This is an employee's petition to set aside a compensation agreement for suspension and settle

Mr. Justice Scandan delivered the opinion of the court. This was a suit to foreclose a trust deed wherein plaintiff also sought a personal deficiency decree against the signers of an extension agreement. Defendants Agnes Dunne O’Connell (sometimes known and referred to as Agnes D. O’Connell), individually and as Executrix and Trustee under the last will of Eva

Mr. Presiding Justice Niemeyer delivered the opinion of the court. By this appeal plaintiff seeks the reversal of an order denying a deficiency decree in a trust deed foreclosure proceeding against certain defendants, successors in interest to the mortgaged property, upon an agreement which the court held to he a contract of, guaranty. Plaintiff claims that it is an extension agree