Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GARY R. BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge: The danger to workers from underpayment by their employers is dear. The danger of overpaying their lawyers is more subtle. —Honorable William Pauley III,’ Fujiwara v. Sushi Yasuda Ltd.,

Graham v New York City Hous. Auth. (2024 NY Slip Op 03810) Graham v New York City Hous. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 03810 Decided on July 17, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

*280OPINION OF THE COURT Lucy Billings, J. Plaintiff mother, Marion Hedges, her son Dayton Hedges who accompanied her, and her husband Michael Hedges, suing derivatively and as her guardian ad litem, seek damages for her life changing injuries when two minor customers of the East River Plaza shopping center in New York County threw a shopping cart fro

PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant has filed a petition for writ of certiorari review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) granting the Employer/Carrier’s (E/C’s) motion to compel an independent medical examination with Dr. Jonathan Hyde, regarding his compensable accident of December 8, 2003. For the reasons set forth herein, we grant the petition and quash the order.

In the event that more than ten percent of class members opt out of the Settlement, their claim shares will be subtracted from the total Settlement Amount. Id. at 28. If more than 60 class members opt out, USAS

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI COSME COLÓN, YADIRA Apelación REGUEIRA ÁLVAREZ Y LA Procedente del SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE Tribunal de GANANCIALES Primera Instancia, COMPUESTA POR AMBOS Sala Superior de

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). (ECF No. 7.) The motion is fully briefed. Based on the moving papers, and for the reasons below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss. I. Allegations In this putative class action, Plaintiffs allege the foll

Opinion BRUINIERS, J. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Norman Hall pleaded no contest to a felony charge of grand theft from a person (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (c)), 1 admitted two prior felony convictions, and was sentenced to a five-year prison term. After Hall served a portion of his sentence, the

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Corrected Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 668.) This matter is fully briefed and was taken under submission without oral argument. I.JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(3)

975 So.2d 1205 (2008) Victor Manuel ROSARIO-PAREDES, Appellant, v. J.C. WRECKER SERVICE and Bill Farmer, Sheriff of Sumter County, Florida, in his official capacity, Appellees. No. 5D06-4317. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 7, 2008. *1206 Thomas John Dandar of Dandar & Dandar, P.A., Tampa, for Appel

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 400 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISIONS II & III No. CV-21-417 Opinion Delivered October 5, 2022 REBECCA NICHOLS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH DIVISION JAMES SWINDOLL AND

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 400 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISIONS II & III No. CV-21-417 Opinion Delivered October 5, 2022 REBECCA NICHOLS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH DIVISION JAMES SWINDOLL AND CHUC

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [37] DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Rodney Hoffman’s motion for class certification (“Class Cert.”) [Doc. # 37]. Having duly considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court now renders its decision. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: California Business and Professions Code Section 25503(f)-(h) forbids manufacturers and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages from giving anything of value to retailers for advertising their alcoholic products. Thus, for example, a liquor store owner in California can hang a Captain Morgan Rum sign in his store’s window, but

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIA DAVIDSON, individually, and on No. 18-56188 behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:17-cv-00603- RGK-AJW v. O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC, OPINION a Delaware corporation

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIA DAVIDSON, individually, and on No. 18-56188 behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:17-cv-00603- RGK-AJW v. O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC, OPINION a Delaware corporation

Filed 5/24/23; Opinion following rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, E078673 v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1908673) SAN BERNARDINO

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT B.K., by her next friend Margaret No. 17-17501 Tinsley; B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski; A.C.-B., by D.C. No. their next friend Susan Brandt; M.C.- 2:15-cv-00185- B., by their next friend Susan Brandt; ROS D.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt; J.M., by their next friend Susan Brandt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2946 ROBERT MCDANIEL, as Executor of the Estate of Carl Joseph McDaniel, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SALAM SYED, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the Unit