Cases

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [100,120] Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The original complaint in this action was filed on July 11, 1985. [Doc. # 1.] On January 28, 1997, the Court approved a class-wide set

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

REVISED May 15, 2000 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40064 MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Un

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Justice Stevens would grant the application for stay of execution. Justice Sou-ter and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution and the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the judgment, and remand the case for further cons

957 F.Supp. 893 (1997) Pedro Jesus FLORES, Petitioner, v. Gary JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent. Civil No. SA-96-CA-455. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. March 31, 1997. *894 *895

Order filed February 27, 2018 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-18-00064-CV ____________ MONICA FLORES JOHNSON, Appellant V. DAVIS HARDEN, Appellee On Appeal from the 250th District Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This employment discrimination case was initiated by plaintiff Rene Flores (“plaintiff’) against defendants Carl C. *342Danberg (“Danberg”),1 Mike DeLoy (“De-Loy”),2 G.R. Johnson (“Johnson”),3

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: ECF No. 241 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to misclassi-fication and willfulness. ECF No. 241. The Court will grant the motion in its entirety. I. BACKGROUND In this collective action, Plaintiffs alle

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: In 1997, the plaintiff class (“Flores”) and the government entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement”) which “sets out nationwide policy for the detention, release, and treatment of minors in the custody of the INS.” Settlement ¶ 9. The Settlement creates a presumption in favor of releasing minors and requires plac

HOLCOMB, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P.J., and PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined. In this case, we must determine whether the magistrate who issued the search warrant for Felix Flores’s residence had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. We hold that the magistrate did have a substantial basis.

PER CURIAM: Maria Lourdes Barbara Flores, a native and citizen of the Philippines, seeks review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motions to reopen. We have reviewed Flores’ arguments and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s decisions denying her motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008); Afanwi v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 788 (4th Cir.2008). To the extent Flores chal

PER CURIAM: Maria Lourdes Barbara Flores, a native and citizen of the Philippines, seeks review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motions to reopen. We have reviewed Flores’ arguments and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s decisions denying her motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008); Afanwi v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 788 (4th Cir.2008). To the extent Flores chal

OPINION KELLER, P.J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, and HERVEY, JJ., joined. Appellant was convicted of murdering his pregnant girlfriend’s twin fetuses by stepping on her abdomen, though he maintains that she also took measures to cause the deaths. Appellant raises three constitutional challenges to the capital

PER CURIAM: Miguel Angel Flores seeks habeas relief on two grounds.1 First, he urges that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel during the guilt and penalty phases of his trial. Second, he urges that his convic*457tion should be reversed for failure of the state to advise Flores of his right to inform Mexican consular official

626 S.E.2d 181 (2006) 277 Ga. App. 211 FLORES v. The STATE. No. A05A2201. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 11, 2006. *183 Charles H. Frier, Atlanta, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Peggy R. Katz, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.</

OPINION HOLCOMB, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, WOMACK, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ„ joined. The issue we decide today is whether, absent a compelling need for the testimony, it is error to order defense counsel to testify over objection when called by the State as a fact witness. We conclude it is and reverse the judgment of

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered AND Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

OPINION LILE, Judge: ¶ 1 Appellant Jose Flores Flores was convicted of First Degree Murder, 21 O.S.1991, § 701.7, after a jury trial in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case Number CF-92-4472, before the Honorable E.R. Turn-bull, District Judge.1 In accordance with the jury verdict, Judge Turnbull sentenced Flores to life without the possibility of parole. From t

185 S.W.3d 427 (2005) Arturo FLORES, et al., Appellants, v. MILLENNIUM INTERESTS, LTD., et al., Appellees. No. 04-1003. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 15, 2005. Decided September 30, 2005. Rehearing Denied March 31, 2006. *428 Harry Herzog, David A. Carp, Herzog Carp & McManus, Willi