Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Flores v. Rushing”
People v. Rushingpublic domain
Filed 2/27/25; Certified for Publication 3/20/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, B334988 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA097346) v. CORY T. RUSHING, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgme
Flores v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Albaro Francisco Flores appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The record shows that the trial court orally pronounced two concurrent sentences of 3 1/2 years’ incarceration. The written sentences, however, reflect terms of incarceration of 3.6 years instead of 3.5 years. Finding that the sentence did not contain a scri
Chad Fenley Davis v. David Clarke Rushing, Attorney, and David Clarke Rushing D/B/A the Law Office of David Rushingpublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 9, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00741-CV CHAD FENLEY DAVIS, Appellant V. DAVID CLARKE RUSHING, ATTORNEY, AND DAVID CLARKE RUSHING D/B/A THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID RUSHING, Appellees On Appeal from the 234th District Court
Flores v. Rawlings Co., LLCpublic domain
177 P.3d 341 (2008) Albert FLORES and Donald R. Rapoza, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. The RAWLINGS COMPANY, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 28124. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. February 1, 2008. Reconsideration Granted in Part and Denied in Part March 6, 2008. *343 Thomas R. Grande, (Jeffrey P. Crabtree, and Norman K.K. Lau,
Flores v. Hendersonpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-1049 Document: 010111049241 Date Filed: 05/14/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 14, 2024
Commonwealth v. Rushingpublic domain
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: Randal R. Rushing appeals from the judgment of sentence of three consecutive life sentences plus forty-three years and nine months to eighty-seven years and six months incarceration imposed by the trial court. Appellant was convicted of three counts each of first-degree murder, séc-ond-degree murder, and third-degree murder in connection with the killings of three individuals. He also was adjudicated gu
Flores v. Aon Corp.public domain
2023 IL App (1st) 230140 No. 1-23-0140 Opinion filed September 29, 2023 FIFTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MARIA FLORES, DEANNA DUBE, MISTY
Flores, Antonio R.public domain
Keller, P.J., filed a concurring opinion. Appellant moved to quash the indictment on the ground that it did not sufficiently specify the act or acts relied upon to constitute recklessness in compliance with Article 21.15. 1 The trial court denied the motion, and Appellant was ultimately convicted. On appeal, the court of appeal
Jesus Ponce-Flores v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2377 Doc: 48 Filed: 09/06/2023 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2377 JESUS ANTONIO PONCE-FLORES, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
Flores, Antonio R.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0026-18 ANTONIO R. FLORES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS CONCURRENCE TO REFUSAL TO GRANT STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Flores Santiagopublic domain
[Cite as State v. Flores Santiago, 2020-Ohio-1274.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108458 v. : ARCADIO FLORES-SANTIAGO,
Raymundo Flores v. the State of Texaspublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RAYMUNDO FLORES, § No. 08-24-00095-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 340th Judicial District Cour
Cesar Solis-Flores v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1147 Doc: 67 Filed: 09/11/2023 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1147 CESAR SOLIS-FLORES, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
Flores v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice Larry Flores appeals from the trial court’s order finding that the results of the forensic DNA testing ordered under Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were not favorable to him. Upon review of the record1 before us, we affirm the trial court’s order. *8Factual and P
Hernan Flores v. William Barrpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1591 HERNAN PORTILLO-FLORES, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: May 13, 2020 Decided: September 2, 2
State v. Cardenas-Florespublic domain
/Fl L'E This opinion was filed for record g ,'0~) 4-wi on UJ0a-<5vS:7\f- :) / IN CLERKS OFFICE aJPflBIE COURT, 8TATE OF WAflHINGTON at /-7, ).,.o I , I "\ DATE AUG 1 7.J017 ''.1M;\ lvyw,t . ('~ CHIEF JUSTICE
People v. Amezcua & Florespublic domain
CORRIGAN, J. ***1127 *891 A jury convicted codefendants Oswaldo Amezcua and Joseph Conrad Flores of the first degree murders of George Flores, John Diaz, Arturo Madrigal, and Luis Reyes and fo
State of Iowa v. Alejandro Antonio Florespublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0426 Filed September 27, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ALEJANDRO ANTONIO FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Tom Reidel, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction of one crime and the imposition of consecutive sentenc
Hernan Portillo-Flores v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1591 HERNAN PORTILLO FLORES, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. ------------------------------ AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCI
Barrios-Flores v. Levipublic domain
Sandstrom, Surrogate Judge, concurring specially. [¶ 22] The majority and dissent ignore a rule of jurisprudence nearly as old as the republic to unnecessarily and inappropriately decide an unresolved constitutional issue. The United States Supreme Court traces to Case of Hayburn, 2 U.S. 2 Dall. 408, 1 L.Ed. 436 (1792), the rule that an unresolved constitutional issue is not to be unnecessarily de