Cases

OPINION ERIC L. FRANK, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Earlier this year, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1754, 185 L.Ed.2d 922 (2013), resolving an issue of bankruptcy law that divided the lower courts for close to 100 years. That issue was whether 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4), which provides that a debt “for ... defalcation whil

673 So.2d 691 (1996) Perry L. ROACH v. Janice R. PEARL. No. 95 CA 1573. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 10, 1996. *692 Thomas A. Lussen, Jr., Slidell, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Ernest S. Anderson, Slidell, for Defendant-Appellee. Before LeBLANC, WHIPPLE and FOGG, JJ. FOGG, Judge. In thi

|2LeBLANC, Judge. This appeal is from a decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation granting plaintiffs motion for a protective order but denying plaintiffs motions for purchase of a treadmill, penalties and attorney’s fees, and for a new trial. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On September 17, 1990, Oswald Pearl, plaintiff, injured his back at work when he attempted to st

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fogg v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 473 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Ch. 86-39, Laws of Fla.

Turley, J. delivered the opinion of the court. • This is an attachment bill, on the part of Dyer Pearl, against Decatur Hansborough and his wife Margaret J. Hansborough, resident citizens of the State of Mississippi, to have subjected to the payment of a debt due him from Decatur Hansborough, certain negro slaves, Patsy, Constance, Nicholas, Mary and Martha, which he insists are the property of said Hansborou

Turley, J. delivered the opinion of the court. • This is an attachment bill, on the part of Dyer Pearl, against Decatur Hansborough and his wife Margaret J. Hansborough, resident citizens of the State of Mississippi, to have subjected to the payment of a debt due him from Decatur Hansborough, certain negro slaves, Patsy, Constance, Nicholas, Mary and Martha, which he insists are the property of said Hansborou

Turley, J. delivered the opinion of the court. • This is an attachment bill, on the part of Dyer Pearl, against Decatur Hansborough and his wife Margaret J. Hansborough, resident citizens of the State of Mississippi, to have subjected to the payment of a debt due him from Decatur Hansborough, certain negro slaves, Patsy, Constance, Nicholas, Mary and Martha, which he insists are the property of said Hansborou

Appellants, Pearl River county and Bank of Picayune, filed their original bill and later an amended bill in the chancery court of Hinds county against J.S. Love, superintendent of banks, Merchants' Bank Trust Company, in liquidation, J.L. Berry, liquidator, and L.S. May, treasurer of the state, seeking preference payment out of the assets of the bank of eighteen thousand three hundred forty-eight dollars and forty-three cents, representing the proceeds of certain school warrants belonging to

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Appellant’s Notice of Appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s July 13,2015, memorandum opinion (ECF No. 1-2) and order (ECF No. 1-3) granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant appealed the Bankruptcy Court’s decision on July 23, 2015, (ECF No. 1), and fil

OPINION BY FITZGERALD, J.: Pro se Appellant, Lorie Pearl, appeals from the decree entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. This appeal arises from a case involving the estate of Alice Brown (“Mother”), the mother of Appellant and an incapacitated person. The decree assessed a surcharge against Appellant and her husband, Kenneth Pearl (“Husband”), a non-party to this case. The decree

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CV-0535 ROSE’S 1, LLC, et al., APPELLANTS, v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

MEMORANDUM OPINION Rebecca B. Connelly, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is Cincinnati Insurance Company’s (“Cincinnati Insurance”) renewed motion for summary judgment, seeking a determination that a debt owed to it by Michael D. Chidester is non-dis-chargeable as arising from Mr. Chidester’s defalcation. As more fully set forth below, the Court grants Cincinnati Insurance’s motion for summ

BECK, J. ¶ 1 We decide whether the trial court erred in admitting lay witness testimony about the pain and suffering experienced by someone in a persistent vegetative state. We reverse and remand for a new trial on damages only. ¶ 2 Plaintiff-appellee Seymour Comin-sky1 filed this action on behalf of himself and the Estate of Pearl Cominsky, his wife, against defendant-appell

OPINION OF THE COURT (September 14, 2011) Swan, J. Joel Dowdye appeals his convictions on several felonies including First Degree Murder and requests a new trial.2 Dowdye asserts that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by: (1) conducting a lengthy voir dire of potential jurors concerning their membership in or their connection to the F

757 So.2d 712 (1999) Augustine CAIN v. WINN-DIXIE LOUISIANA, INC. No. 98 CA 0792. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 24, 1999. Writ Denied December 17, 1999. C. Jerome D'Aquila, New Roads, for Plaintiff-Appellee Augustine Cain. David J. Calogero, Lafayette, for Defendant-Appellant Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. Before:

MEMORANDUM OPINION JEFFERY A. DELLER, Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Plaintiff, Maria A. Aiello, regarding her Complaint to Determine Dischargeability Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(4) and/or (6). The Plaintiff, Ms. Aiello, seeks a determination by way of summary judgment that the debt owed by the Debtor, David J. Aiell

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE Wendy L. Hagenau, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Plaintiff obtained a judgment against the Debtor in the Superior Court of Fulton County, and the Debtor has been convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering and of twelv

| .CARTER, C.J. Richard P. Guidry appeals the denial of his petition seeking to annul a prior judgment finding appellant, along with Elmo Pitre, Jr., and Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. (Belle Pass) liable on a $2 million promissory note. BACKGROUND This litigation arises out of a business deal gone sour between Guidry, Pitre, Belle Pass, Joseph E. Blanchard, Jr., Jolin, Inc. (Jolin), an

PER CURIAM. We agree with the holding of the trial court, following Fogg v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 473 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), that the 1986 amendment to section 697.-05(3), Florida Statutes (1985), which eliminated the interest forfeiture provision of the Balloon Mortgage Law, applies to a mortgage entered into before its effective date. See Tralins v. Pearl, 497 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (per

466 F.Supp.2d 1175 (2006) Pearl COTTIER and Rebecca Three Stars, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MARTIN; Todd Alexander, Rod Anderson, Scott Larson, Don Moore, Brad Otte, and Molly Risse, in their official capacities as members of the Martin City Council; and Janet Speidel, in her official capacity as Finance Officer of the City of Martin, Defendants. Civ. No. 02-5021-KES. United States District Court, D. South