Cases

IN CAMERA ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge. This case is before the Court on counsel for plaintiffs’ Petition for Division of Attorney’s Fees (Doc. S — 3). Pursuant to Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4 — 1.5(f), plaintiffs’ attorneys seek authorization to (1) divide attorney’s fees between themselves in excess of the usual 25% limit, and (2) increase their total contingency fee

OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Ford Motor Company appeals - the trial court’s order denying its .motion to transfer venue from Dallas County to Collin County. In a single issue, Ford contends the trial court erred by denying its motion to transfer venue because Casey, Pear-lette, and Sjon Johnson failed to meet their burden to show Ford has a principal office in Dallas County. In

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge. hln this products-liability case, appellants Michael Gartman and Kemal Kutait, as representative of his daughter Rebecca’s estate, appeal from a jury verdict in favor of appellee Ford Motor Company. We affirm. 1 The parties ag

MEMORANDUM OPINION KATZ, District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant Ford Motor Company’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22.), which the Court grants, and Ms. Kuns’ motion to amend the complaint to cure jurisdictional defects (Doc. 32), which the Court also grants. Ms. Kuns purchased a new 2010 Mercury Mariner from a Ford dealer in Vermillion, Ohio. T

PD-1137-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/5/2015 2:19:56 PM Accepted 10/7/2015 2:38:31 PM

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is a products liability action brought by plaintiffs Linda and Daniel Buck (Buck), against defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford). In 2006, Linda Buck was injured when a 1999 Ford Expedition, driven by J.D. White, crashed through a wall of the bakery in which Linda Buck was working — allegedly due to an electronic malfunction that suddenly seized control of the t

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 4, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00641-CR SIR MELVIN WRIGHT, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

OPINION Nadia Alejandra Sanchez Villanueva bought a used 1996 Ford Explorer in Mexico. Villanueva and some other citizens of *Page 478 Mexico decided to take the Explorer on a trip from Monterrey, Mexico, to Nuevo Laredo, located in the Mexican State of Tamaulipas. During the trip, the vehicle rolled over. Some of the eleven occupants of the vehicle were killed, and others were injured. The Mexican Federal

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge. | Jhis appeal arises from a lawsuit against appellee Ford Motor Co. over the handling, stability, and crashworthiness of a 1987 van that rolled over on a Kansas highway in 2003. The accident killed two persons and injured nine. The injured parties (or their guardians) and the administrators of the two decedents’ estates are the appellants herein, and they sued Ford |2in 2004

OPINION AND ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief Judge. Randall Ford, Inc. (“Randall Ford”) has filed a motion to compel discovery (Doc. 22) pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Randall Ford requested in discovery that Doyle Martin (“Martin”) execute releases permitting Randall Ford to obtain Martin’s medical and employment records. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“the

OPINION BY Judge PATRICIA A. McCullough. This case returns to us following our remand for further proceedings in Wright v. Lower Salford Township, (Pa.Cmwlth., No. 788 C.D. 2012, 2013 WL 3156614, filed June 19, 2013) (unreported) (“Wright I”). Jeffery A. Wright (Wright) appeals from the June 24, 2015 order of the Cour

647 F.Supp.2d 791 (2007) Mark ENSLEY, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendant(s). Case No. 06-12845. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 10, 2007. *794 Cary S. McGehee, Michael L. Pitt, Peggy G. Pitt, Pitt, McGehee, Robert W. Palmer, Pitt, Dowty, Royal Oak, MI, for Plaintiff

346 A.2d 217 (1975) Emma F. ADAMS v. Ford WRIGHT, Jr. No. 51-74. Supreme Court of Vermont. October 7, 1975. *218 Edward R. Kiel, and Whitcomb, Clark & Moeser, Springfield, for plaintiff. Sarah E. Vail, of Ainsworth & Richards, Springfield, for defendant. Before BARNEY, C. J., SMITH, DALEY and LARROW, JJ., an

(2008) Holly BURNS, Plaintiff v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. Civil No. 06-5201. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. February 13, 2008. ORDER JIMM LARRY HENDREN, District Judge. Now on this 13th day of February, 2008, comes on for consideration Plaintiff, Holly Burns', Motion Challenging The Constituti

341 F.Supp.2d 617 (2004) William L. PRIDE, Jr. Plaintiff v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; et al. Defendants No. 2:04 CV 116-D-A. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division. September 28, 2004. *618 *619 Drayton Durell Berkley, Cochran Cherry Givens Smith & Bolton LLP, Memphis, TN

208 S.W.3d 153 (2005) D.R. "Buddy" WALLIS, Appellant v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee. No. 04-506. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 12, 2005. *154 Turner & Associates, by: Tab Turner, North Little Rock; and Thrash Law Firm, by: Thomas P. Thrash, Little Rock, for appellant. Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, by: Edwin L. Lowt

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS TERRY WOLFENBARGER and MARLA FOR PUBLICATION WOLFENBARGER, February 11, 2021 9

OPINION J. BRETT BUSBY, Justice. Appellee Ollie James Ford, Jr., was indicted on July 20, 2010, for the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child that allegedly occurred on or about November 22, 1995. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the indictment for prosecu-torial delay of more than fourteen years between the alleged offense and the ind

107 S.W.3d 168 (2003) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, North Point Ford, Inc. v. The Reverend Milton HARPER, Janice Harper, Upper Room Apostolic Church, and Leon Dulemer. No. 01-1286. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 22, 2003. Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, LLP, by Edwin L. Lowther, Jr., Troy A. Price and Jerry J. Sallings, Little Rock, for appellants. David A. Hodges; and

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING OUSACHI PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL (DKT. #40) AND DENYING NOWAK AND MCNEELY PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS (DKT. ## 9, 25) PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a consolidated ERISA case brought by certain salaried and hourly Ford employ*357ees against Ford Motor Company