⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ford v. Butler”

District Court, D. South Carolina · 2010-07-09 · Published · cited 6× · 724 F. Supp. 2d 575; 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 691; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70261; 2010 WL 2756970
724 F.Supp.2d 575 (2010) John Douglas BUTLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jon Trevor Butler, deceased, and William Michael Prince, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Continental General Tire Company, Continental Tire North America, Inc., and Snow Tire Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-1875-TLW. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 42 F. App'x 463
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 671 F. App'x 303
PER CURIAM: * The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument, and the record. Having done so we find no reversible error and affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R 47.5., the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not p
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988-10-12 · Published · cited 0× · 532 So. 2d 1178; 1988 La. App. LEXIS 2083; 1988 WL 108823
WATKINS, Judge. Plaintiff, Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC), appeals the trial court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction prohibiting the sale of certain property which plaintiff seized by way of executory process. On or about November 24, 1986, FMCC filed an executory proceeding against defendants, Monroe Butler and Hazel Singleton Butler to effect the seizure and sale of certain property in St. Hele
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 936 F. Supp. 2d 920; 2013 WL 1283475; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42159; 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1496
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, District Judge. Plaintiff, Craig Butler, filed a seven-count amended complaint against defendants, National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak (“Amtrak”), Rudy Durkovic, and Greg Avey (collectively referred to as “defendants”), alleging race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015-04-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2015 Ark. App. 214; 462 S.W.3d 683; 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 251
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge 11 Appellant Butler & Cook, Inc. (B & C), appeals the order entered by the Sebastian County Circuit Court, finding in favor of appellee Ozark Warehouses, Inc., d/b/a Corrugated Specialties (Corrugated), on its negligence claim and awarding Corrugated $12,000 damages. On appeal, B & C argues that the trial court clearly e
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017-07-25 · Published · cited 3× · 223 So. 3d 835; 2017 WL 3190593; 2017 Miss. App. LEXIS 414
WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Alice Butler was admitted to Central Mississippi Medical Center (CMMC) on October 28, 2009, with severe hip pain. Alice’s doctor at CMMC believed that she needed a hip replacement, but he recommended that she undergo a course of rehabilitation to improve her strength prior to surgery. On November 5, 2009, Alice was tra
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015-03-11 · Published · cited 27× · 860 N.W.2d 686; 2015 Minn. LEXIS 113; 2015 WL 1085000
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A12-2266 Court of Appeals Wright, J. Dissenting, Lillehaug, Page, JJ. State of Minnesota, Took no part, Anderson, J. Respondent, vs.
Butler v. Raffertypublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2003-06-10 · Published · cited 53× · 792 N.E.2d 1055; 100 N.Y.2d 265; 762 N.Y.S.2d 567; 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 1410
100 N.Y.2d 265 (2003) 792 N.E.2d 1055 762 N.Y.S.2d 567 KATE L. BUTLER, an Infant, by WILLIAM C. BUTLER et al., Her Parents, Appellants, v. BRIAN F. RAFFERTY, Respondent, et al., Defendants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 30, 2003. Decided June 10, 2003. Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., Albany, for
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987-10-16 · Published · cited 9× · 829 F.2d 568; 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1280; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13838
PER CURIAM: The sole issue in this appeal is whether under Mississippi law, a secured creditor breaches the peace, and therefore illegally repossesses a vehicle, when he makes an unauthorized entry onto the driveway of the debtor’s residence to remove the vehicle. We hold that he does not, and we therefore affirm a summary judgment
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011-03-01 · Published · cited 3× · 944 N.E.2d 78; 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 350; 2011 WL 700525
944 N.E.2d 78 (2011) James TAYLOR and Nancy Taylor, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Arthur Adams, and Automotive Components Holdings, LLC, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-1007-CT-823. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 1, 2011. *79 Scott A. Benkie, Douglas A. Crawford, Benkie & Crawford, Indianapolis, IN, Attorn
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 664 F. Supp. 2d 752; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 597
664 F.Supp.2d 752 (2009) In re FORD MOTOR CO. SPEED COTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. MDL No. 1718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2009. Order on Clarification and Reconsideration January 4, 2010. *754 Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Houston
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 18 A.3d 1278; 2011 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 186; 2011 WL 1499446
Edinboro University of Pennsylvania (Edinboro) appeals from the April 21, 2010 Final Determination of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records (OOR) which granted the request of Bret Ford (Requester). There is essentially one issue before the Court: whether payroll records maintained by a party who contracted to perform work for Edinboro on a specified project as pertaining to that project are "public records" for purposes of the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL),
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008-03-28 · Published · cited 10× · 659 S.E.2d 346; 283 Ga. 398; 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1087; 2008 Ga. LEXIS 296
659 S.E.2d 346 (2008) FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. GIBSON et al. Gibson et al. v. Ford Motor Company. Draw-Tite, Inc. v. Gibson et al. Gibson et al. v. Draw-Tite, Inc. Nos. S07A1365, S07X1389, S07A1367, S07X1368. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 28, 2008. *348 Frank Faison Middleton IV, Watson, Spence,
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009-12-24 · Published · cited 14× · 986 A.2d 964; 2009 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1700; 2009 WL 4981599
986 A.2d 964 (2009) Edward L. FLANDERS, Jr., t/d/b/a E.L. Flanders — ELF Appliance and Service, Appellant v. FORD CITY BOROUGH COUNCIL Per The Ford City Uniform Construction Code Board of Appeals. No. 695 C.D. 2009 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 13, 2009. Decided December 24, 2009. *966 Michae
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 111 F. App'x 356
COOK, Circuit Judge. Donald Ford operated “charity” bingo games from which he stole hundreds of thousands of dollars. Following his gambling and money-laundering convictions, the United States sought forfeiture of almost $1 million. The Regular Veterans Association (RVA) and Margaret Ford filed claims to the forfeited money. The district court dismissed RVA’s claim without a hearing because RVA failed to present a prima faci
Olsen v. Butlerpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 02713
Olsen v Butler (2024 NY Slip Op 02713) Olsen v Butler 2024 NY Slip Op 02713 Decided on May 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 618 S.E.2d 47; 274 Ga. App. 459; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 2136; 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 694
618 S.E.2d 47 (2005) 274 Ga. App. 459 FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. SASSER. No. A05A1152. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 1, 2005. Reconsideration Denied July 15, 2005. *49 Teresa W. Roseborough, Deborah M. Danzig, Kristen H. Glover, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, W. Seaborn Jones, Philippa V
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005-04-26 · Published · cited 12× · 612 S.E.2d 301; 279 Ga. 284; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1385; 2005 Ga. LEXIS 302
612 S.E.2d 301 (2005) 279 Ga. 284 FORD MOTOR CO. v. LAWRENCE. No. S05A0900. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 26, 2005. *302 Watson, Spence, Lowe & Chambless, LLP, Frank F. Middleton IV, Albany, McKenna, Long & Aidridge, LLP, Charles K. Reed, James B. Manley, Jr., Jill C. Kuhn, Sutherland, Asbill &am;
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 980 So. 2d 1003; 2007 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 579
THOMAS, Judge. On December 3, 2003, Bennie Ford was working for McKenzie Brothers Construction Company, Inc. (“McKenzie”), when he was allegedly injured in the line and scope of his employment. At the time of his alleged injury, Ford, who is a resident of Mississippi, was working for McKenzie in Choctaw County, Alabama, laying concrete block at a school construction site. McKenzie is a Mississippi company and is a member of