Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ford v. Butler”
Butler v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
724 F.Supp.2d 575 (2010) John Douglas BUTLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jon Trevor Butler, deceased, and William Michael Prince, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Continental General Tire Company, Continental Tire North America, Inc., and Snow Tire Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-1875-TLW. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division.
Butler Ford, Inc. v. Venemanpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Butler v. Axiall, L.L.C.public domain
PER CURIAM: * The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument, and the record. Having done so we find no reversible error and affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R 47.5., the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not p
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Butlerpublic domain
WATKINS, Judge. Plaintiff, Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC), appeals the trial court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction prohibiting the sale of certain property which plaintiff seized by way of executory process. On or about November 24, 1986, FMCC filed an executory proceeding against defendants, Monroe Butler and Hazel Singleton Butler to effect the seizure and sale of certain property in St. Hele
Butler v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, District Judge. Plaintiff, Craig Butler, filed a seven-count amended complaint against defendants, National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak (“Amtrak”), Rudy Durkovic, and Greg Avey (collectively referred to as “defendants”), alleging race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Butler & Cook, Inc. v. Ozark Warehouses, Inc.public domain
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge 11 Appellant Butler & Cook, Inc. (B & C), appeals the order entered by the Sebastian County Circuit Court, finding in favor of appellee Ozark Warehouses, Inc., d/b/a Corrugated Specialties (Corrugated), on its negligence claim and awarding Corrugated $12,000 damages. On appeal, B & C argues that the trial court clearly e
WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Alice Butler was admitted to Central Mississippi Medical Center (CMMC) on October 28, 2009, with severe hip pain. Alice’s doctor at CMMC believed that she needed a hip replacement, but he recommended that she undergo a course of rehabilitation to improve her strength prior to surgery. On November 5, 2009, Alice was tra
State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurraypublic domain
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A12-2266 Court of Appeals Wright, J. Dissenting, Lillehaug, Page, JJ. State of Minnesota, Took no part, Anderson, J. Respondent, vs.
Butler v. Raffertypublic domain
100 N.Y.2d 265 (2003) 792 N.E.2d 1055 762 N.Y.S.2d 567 KATE L. BUTLER, an Infant, by WILLIAM C. BUTLER et al., Her Parents, Appellants, v. BRIAN F. RAFFERTY, Respondent, et al., Defendants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 30, 2003. Decided June 10, 2003. Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., Albany, for
Robert Butler v. Ford Motor Credit Companypublic domain
PER CURIAM: The sole issue in this appeal is whether under Mississippi law, a secured creditor breaches the peace, and therefore illegally repossesses a vehicle, when he makes an unauthorized entry onto the driveway of the debtor’s residence to remove the vehicle. We hold that he does not, and we therefore affirm a summary judgment
Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
944 N.E.2d 78 (2011) James TAYLOR and Nancy Taylor, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Arthur Adams, and Automotive Components Holdings, LLC, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-1007-CT-823. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 1, 2011. *79 Scott A. Benkie, Douglas A. Crawford, Benkie & Crawford, Indianapolis, IN, Attorn
In Re Ford Motor Co.public domain
664 F.Supp.2d 752 (2009) In re FORD MOTOR CO. SPEED COTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. MDL No. 1718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 29, 2009. Order on Clarification and Reconsideration January 4, 2010. *754 Michael A. Caddell, Caddell & Chapman, Houston
Edinboro University of Pennsylvania v. Fordpublic domain
Edinboro University of Pennsylvania (Edinboro) appeals from the April 21, 2010 Final Determination of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records (OOR) which granted the request of Bret Ford (Requester). There is essentially one issue before the Court: whether payroll records maintained by a party who contracted to perform work for Edinboro on a specified project as pertaining to that project are "public records" for purposes of the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL),
Ford Motor Company v. Gibsonpublic domain
659 S.E.2d 346 (2008) FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. GIBSON et al. Gibson et al. v. Ford Motor Company. Draw-Tite, Inc. v. Gibson et al. Gibson et al. v. Draw-Tite, Inc. Nos. S07A1365, S07X1389, S07A1367, S07X1368. Supreme Court of Georgia. March 28, 2008. *348 Frank Faison Middleton IV, Watson, Spence,
Flanders v. Ford City Borough Councilpublic domain
986 A.2d 964 (2009) Edward L. FLANDERS, Jr., t/d/b/a E.L. Flanders ELF Appliance and Service, Appellant v. FORD CITY BOROUGH COUNCIL Per The Ford City Uniform Construction Code Board of Appeals. No. 695 C.D. 2009 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 13, 2009. Decided December 24, 2009. *966 Michae
United States v. Fordpublic domain
COOK, Circuit Judge. Donald Ford operated “charity” bingo games from which he stole hundreds of thousands of dollars. Following his gambling and money-laundering convictions, the United States sought forfeiture of almost $1 million. The Regular Veterans Association (RVA) and Margaret Ford filed claims to the forfeited money. The district court dismissed RVA’s claim without a hearing because RVA failed to present a prima faci
Olsen v. Butlerpublic domain
Olsen v Butler (2024 NY Slip Op 02713) Olsen v Butler 2024 NY Slip Op 02713 Decided on May 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Ford Motor Co. v. Sasserpublic domain
618 S.E.2d 47 (2005) 274 Ga. App. 459 FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. SASSER. No. A05A1152. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 1, 2005. Reconsideration Denied July 15, 2005. *49 Teresa W. Roseborough, Deborah M. Danzig, Kristen H. Glover, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, W. Seaborn Jones, Philippa V
Ford Motor Co. v. Lawrencepublic domain
612 S.E.2d 301 (2005) 279 Ga. 284 FORD MOTOR CO. v. LAWRENCE. No. S05A0900. Supreme Court of Georgia. April 26, 2005. *302 Watson, Spence, Lowe & Chambless, LLP, Frank F. Middleton IV, Albany, McKenna, Long & Aidridge, LLP, Charles K. Reed, James B. Manley, Jr., Jill C. Kuhn, Sutherland, Asbill &am;
Ford v. McKenzie Bros. Construction Co.public domain
THOMAS, Judge. On December 3, 2003, Bennie Ford was working for McKenzie Brothers Construction Company, Inc. (“McKenzie”), when he was allegedly injured in the line and scope of his employment. At the time of his alleged injury, Ford, who is a resident of Mississippi, was working for McKenzie in Choctaw County, Alabama, laying concrete block at a school construction site. McKenzie is a Mississippi company and is a member of