Cases

405 B.R. 709 (2009) In re NORVERGENCE, INC., Debtor. Charles M. Forman, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Norvergence, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Thomas N. Salzano, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-32079(RG). Adversary No. 06-2142(RG). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. May 13, 2009. *715 Porzio, Bromberg & New

793 F.Supp.2d 598 (2011) Beth FORMAN, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of John Napolitano, Plaintiff, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 09-CV-4678 (ADS)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 27, 2011. *599 Valad & Vecchione, PLLC, by Bart T. Valad, Esq., John J. Vecchione, Es

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: 1. INTRODUCTION Police officers are permitted to briefly stop any individual, but only upon reasonable suspicion that he is committing a crime.1 The source of that limitation is the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees that “the right of the people to be secure

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise from a dispute among several groups of attorneys over the entitlement to attorney’s fees awarded in connection with the settlement *1022of a mass tort litigation in the district court, Tolbert v. Monsanto Co.1 It appears that on September 21, 1994, A. Dw

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................354 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................355 A. The SAFE Act ......................................................355 1. Assault Weapons..........

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ERIC N. VITALIANO, District Judge. New York City has been involved in regulating debt collection since at least 1984, when it began requiring debt collection agencies to obtain a municipal license in order to practice in the city. In March 2009, New York City Council passed Local Law 15, which, inter alia, amended the debt collection ordinance to cover debt buyer

Memorandum Opinion on Professional Fees and Expenses, the Indenture’s Operating Expenses, and 11 U.S.C. § 928(b)’s “Necessary Operating Expenses ” THOMAS B. BENNETT, Chief Judge. I. Words, Phrases, And Meanings Be They Plain or Not Some of what the law is about is words and their usage. From the view of one version of objectivity, language is objective in the sense that i

OPINION AND ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this civil rights action, the named plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, seek relief for alleged constitutional violations by a unit of the New York City Police Department known as the Street Crime Unit (the “SCU”).1 It is alleged that i

131 F.Supp.2d 393 (2000) LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES, TECHNICIANS AND HEALTH CARE WORKERS OF NEW YORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. ULYSSES CRUISES, INC., d/b/a Premier Cruises Defendant. No. 00 Civ. 4349(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 15, 2000. *394 *395 Mitchel B. Craner, N

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Order entered February 22, 2007, insofar as appealed from, reversed without costs and the branch of defendants’ motion seeking to dismiss the complaint granted. *3Appeal from the above-stated portions of the order entered July 27, 2007 dismissed as academic. Plaintiff is a Delaware cor

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: At issue today is whether the district court erred by refusing to issue an order to show cause why Bersin Bagel Group (“Bersin”) should not be cited for contempt for prosecuting a series of state law claims in a Florida court after having been enjoined from doing so by the federal court. This is the second trip this case has taken to our Court. The first t

680 A.2d 584 (1996) 111 Md. App. 156 INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF the STATE OF MARYLAND v. The MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK. No. 1566, Sept. Term, 1995. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 28, 1996. Reconsideration Denied August 29, 1996. *585 Christina Gerstung Beusch, As

ATKINS, Senior District Judge: Brown-Forman Corporation appeals from a district court order holding that all releases of claims under the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, are invalid unless they are supervised by a court or by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court’s order and REMAND for a determination of whether the release in this

EVANS, Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that we have no jurisdiction to hear this appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the district court’s postjudgment Enforcement *1331Order against Bersin is a final order. It granted all of the relief sought by OBWB’s motion to enforce the judgment against Bersin. O

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ALLAN L. GROPPER, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”), one of the debtors in the above-captioned bankruptcy case, on its claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and FlashPoint Technology, Inc. (“FlashPoint”). Apple and Flash

Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SEA SHEPHERD NEW ZEALAND and SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, a United States government agency, JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Admini

Case: 22-1249 Document: 71 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GOOGLE LLC, INTEL CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE

Case: 22-1249 Document: 71 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GOOGLE LLC, INTEL CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE

598 F.3d 1336 (2010) ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, and the President and Fellows of Harvard College, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2008-1248. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 22, 2010. *

560 F.3d 1366 (2009) ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, and The President and Fellows of Harvard College, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2008-1248. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 3, 2009. *1