Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Four Jacobs Realty Corp.”
Evans v. J Four Realty, LLCpublic domain
Dalianis, C. J. The respondent, J Four Realty, LLC (J Four), appeals an order of the 1st Circuit Court — Lancaster District Division (Patten, J.) finding that it violated RSA 540-A:2 and :3, II (2007) by using self-help to evict the petitioner, Mary Evans, and awarding her actual damages of $3,000 and attorney’s fees and costs, see RSA 540-A-.4, IX(a) (Supp. 2012). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Realty v. Gustin Corp.public domain
McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mott, J.), entered October 21, 2013 in Ulster County, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. *1205On June 4, 2010, plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, and defendant Christopher J. Seche, as a principal of defendant Gustin Corporation, entered into an exclusive right to sell agr
Realty v. Gustin Corp.public domain
McCarthy, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mott, J.), entered October 21, 2013 in Ulster County, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. *1205On June 4, 2010, plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, and defendant Christopher J. Seche, as a principal of defendant Gustin Corporation, entered into an exclusive right to sell agr
King Construction, Inc. v. Plaza Four Realty, LLCpublic domain
976 A.2d 145 (2009) KING CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. PLAZA FOUR REALTY, LLC, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 84, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: June 24, 2009. Decided: July 15, 2009. *147 Robert J. Leoni, Esquire, Shelsby & Leoni, Stanton, DE, for appellant. David Roe
342 E. 67 Realty LLC v. Jacobspublic domain
Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered February 1, 2012, which reversed an order, of the Civil Court, New York County (Ann E. O’Shea, J.), entered March 30, 2011, granting respondent’s motion to vacate a default judgment, and reinstated the default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded to Civil Court for a hearing in accordance with this decision. The Civ
342 E. 67 Realty LLC v. Jacobspublic domain
Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered February 1, 2012, which reversed an order, of the Civil Court, New York County (Ann E. O’Shea, J.), entered March 30, 2011, granting respondent’s motion to vacate a default judgment, and reinstated the default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded to Civil Court for a hearing in accordance with this decision. The Civ
Matter of Abklir Realty Co., Inc. v Nassau Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. (2025 NY Slip Op 00318) Matter of Abklir Realty Co., Inc. v Nassau Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. 2025 NY Slip Op 00318 Decided on January 22, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department
Helms Realty Corp. v. City of N.Y.public domain
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff Helms Realty Corp. ("Helms") filed this action on June 20, 2017, challenging the constitutionality of Section 121 of New York's Multiple Dwelling Law *530("MDL"),1 passed into law on October 21, 2016 and colloquially referred to as the "Airbnb Law." Section 121 prohibits adv
Jacobs v. Sandusky Registerpublic domain
[Cite as Jacobs v. Sandusky Register, 2024-Ohio-5422.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Matthew Jacobs Court of Appeals No. E-24-006 Appellant Trial Court No. 2022 CV 0097 v. Sandusky Register, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. Shawpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Chambers, J. We are asked in this case to decide whether the defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ causes of action which are based upon allegations of legal malpractice allegedly occurring during the defendants’ representation of the plaintiff debtors in bankruptcy proceedings. *260
Jacobs v. Akademos, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN JACOBS, ALAN JACOBS, THE ) BERNARD B. JACOBS AND SARA JACOBS ) FAMILY TRUST, JEAN-LOUIS VELAISE, ) DALE KUTNICK, TOREN KUTNICK, ) EDWARD B. ROBERTS, JOHN DENNIS, ) SHLOMO BAKHASH, and JOAN RUBIN, ) ) Plaintiffs, )
Jacobs v. Locatellipublic domain
Opinion RUSHING, P. J.— Introduction Bernice Jacobs (Jacobs) appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court after a demurrer to her complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Jacobs is a real estate broker who claims that she is owed a commission for her efforts to sell a parcel of property in Marin County. She alleges th
Barton v. Realty Corp. of Am.public domain
[Cite as Barton v. Realty Corp. of Am., 2012-Ohio-1838.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97340 CARLTON BARTON, JR. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
Commerce Park Realty, LLC v. HR2-A Corp. as General Partner of HR2-A Limited Partnershippublic domain
June 30, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2020-33-Appeal. (PB 11-1922) Commerce Park Realty, LLC, et al. : v. : HR2-A Corp. as General Partner of : HR2-A Limited Partnership et al. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before
Portofino Realty Corp. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal (2021 NY Slip Op 02184) Portofino Realty Corp. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2021 NY Slip Op 02184 Decided on April 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Depar
Jacobs v. Locatellipublic domain
Filed 2/28/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BERNICE JACOBS, H042292 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. CV179082) v. ORDER MO
Jacobs v. CNG Transmission Corp.public domain
332 F.Supp.2d 759 (2004) Darryl M. JACOBS and Suzanne M. Jacobs, his wife, and Penneco Energy Corp., Plaintiffs, v. CNG TRANSMISSION CORP., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 96-319. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. July 6, 2004. *760 *761 *762 Robert W.
KNOLL, Justice.1 11 This civil action presents the issue of whether a written settlement agreement compromising a contested property insurance claim constitutes “proof of loss” under La.Rev.Stat. § 22:1892(A)(1) sufficient to trigger the penalties set forth in La. Rev.Stat. § 22:1892(B) for the insurer’s arbitrary and capricious failure to timely pay the settlement funds.
Commerce Park Realty, LLC v. HR2-A Corp. as General Partner of HR2-A Limited Partnershippublic domain
June 30, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2019-468-Appeal. (PB 11-1922) Commerce Park Realty, LLC, et al. : v. : HR2-A Corp. as General Partner : of HR2-A Limited Partnership et al. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Is
Commerce Park Realty, LLC v. HR2-A Corp. as General Partner of HR2-A Limited Partnershippublic domain
Issued June 30, 2021 Corrected July 1, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2019-468-Appeal. (PB 11-1922) Commerce Park Realty, LLC, et al. : v. : HR2-A Corp. as General Partner : of HR2-A Limited Partnership et al. NOTICE: This opinio