Cases

689 F.Supp.2d 910 (2010) John T. VALENTE, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, Defendant. Case No. 3:08-cv-225. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. January 4, 2010. *914 John Valente, Dayton, OH, pro se. Jennifer Nicole Fuller, Paul Gerard Hallinan, Dayton, OH, for Defendant.

Van Voorhis, J. Minot F. Jelke has been convicted in the Court of General Sessions of conspiracy to commit acts injurious to public morals under section 580 of the Penal Law, and of being a male person living on the proceeds of prostitution under section 1148 of the Penal Law. This appeal is not from any order or judgment rendered in the Jelke trial. He is not a party to this proceeding, which was instituted under article 78 of

Cohn, J. Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, made pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act vacating an order of the Court of General Sessions which adjudged petitioner guilty of criminal contempt of court and which sentenced him to thirty days in the city prison and to pay a fine of $250. *360In the month of Oc

104 B.R. 617 (1989) In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Reomar, Inc., The LTV Corporation, et al., Debtors. In re LTV STEEL COMPANY, INC. and Tuscaloosa Energy Corporation, Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 86 B 11270(BRL)-86 B 11334(BRL), 86 B 11402(BRL), 86 B 11464(BRL), 86 B 11273(BRL) and 86 B 11327(BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. August 16, 1989.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. *Page 683

Schreiber, J. These are applications by various newspaper publishers and associations for an order of prohibition against the Hon. Francis A. Várente, Judge of the Court of General Sessions, restraining said Justice from enforcing an order made by him during the pending trial of the action of People v. Jelke. The order excluded the general public and the press from the courtroom for the duration of the People’s

308 N.Y. 71 (1954) In the Matter of United Press Associations et al., Appellants, v. Francis L. Valente, Individually and as Judge of The Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued November 16, 1953. Decided December 31, 1954 Thomas A. Diskin, Harry H. Van Aken, C. Coudert Nast<

*131OPINION OF THE COURT Lee L. Holzman, J. In this proceeding to probate a testamentary instrument executed on October 16, 1992, the nominated executor, an attorney and a member of the same firm as the attorney who drafted the will, seeks a waiver under SCPA 2307-a (9) (0b) of the provisions of the statute which limit his commissions to one half of t

OPINION CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge. In the latest phase of this protracted litigation, the Court is called upon to adjudicate defendants’ challenges to claims filed pursuant to a class action settlement agreement. Under the agreement, the Court is charged with resolving disputes as to the validity of claims. Because defendants have a reversionary interest in the settlement fund, defendants seek

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff Townsend Rabinowitz Pantaleoni & Valente, P.C. (“Townsend”), brought *672this diversity action to recover a balance allegedly due from defendants Holland Industries, Inc. (“Holland”) and Michael Margolies (“Margolies”). Margolies now brings a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., for lack of s

193 F.Supp. 8 (1961) Jerome LEON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 20055. United States District Court E. D. New York. March 31, 1961. Harry D. Breslau, New York City, Francis L. Valente, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff. Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U. S. Atty., for Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., for d

S. Samuel Di Falco, S. The sole issue raised by the objections to the account of the executrix arises from the rejection by the executrix of a claim by 0. Roy Chalk-77th St., Inc., for rent under a lease made by the decedent. The claim is for rent for the months of January to April inclusive, together with the expenses of the claimant in reletting the property. The apartment had been rented for a period of three years and two mo

Jacob Markowitz, J. This is an application by the settlor of an inter vivos trust who is also the beneficiary thereunder to compel revocation and surrender of the corpus. The trust was created in November, 1955 shortly after the settlor inherited a considerable sum of money as the result of the termination, by her father’s death, of two trusts, one inter vivos and one testamentary created by h

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. No. 22-cv-2427 (DLF) MEDIALINKS TV, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Roy Williams brings this employment action against MediaLinks TV, LLC. Before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Judgment

The Pollodoro Restaurant Co., Inc., was the owner of premises 163 West Forty-eighth street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, which was subject to a first and second mortgage aggregating $115,000. For money loaned it executed and delivered to the defendant Giulio Zunino its bond, dated December 12, 1922, payable *Page 23 in one year for the sum of $23,000, secured by a third mortgage on said premises in the sum of $46,000, which third mortgag

The defendants were convicted of murder in the first degree, and sentenced to be executed, after a trial in the Court of General Sessions in New York County. They had pleaded not guilty with a specification of insanity pursuant to section 336 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and it was contended on their behalf that they were legally insane at the time of the commission of the crime and at the time of arraignment and trial. On the 14th day of January, 1941, Alfred Klausman, the decea

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion. (See 291 N.Y. 702. ) Concur: LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Dissenting: LEHMAN, Ch. J., and RIPPEY, J., on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

155 F.Supp.2d 577 (2001) X-IT PRODUCTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. WALTER KIDDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. A. 2:00CV513. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. July 9, 2001. *578 *579 *580

Foley, S. This is an application by the trustee for instructions. The testator died on June 12, 1934. By his will he created a trust of his residuary estate to continue during the lives of his son and daughter. From the income of the trust he directs the payment of an annuity of $12,000 a year to his widow, and should the income be insufficient the will provides for invasion of principal to make up any deficit. The balance of th

The defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree. The deceased had been his mistress. He admitted he had inflicted the stab wounds that resulted in her death. His only claim was that when this occurred his intelligence was suspended by drunkenness. Accordingly, the trial judge in his charge said to the jury, "In fact, there is not much dispute here as to what really happened, except as to the mental condition of the defendant at the time that he cut this girl." In Peo