Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Francisco Roman, Jr.”
Roman-Nunez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Salvador Roman-Nunez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determ
Roman-Nunez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Salvador Roman-Nunez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determ
98 F.3d 416 65 USLW 2241, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7509,96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,361 Francisco Lucas RODRIGUEZ-ROMAN, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70230. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1996.*
Hernandez-Roman v. Ashcroftpublic domain
MEMORANDUM*** Aurora Hernandez-Roman, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *273the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo. Montero-Martinez v. Ashc
Colosmio v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake Citypublic domain
104 P.3d 646 (2004) 2004 UT App 436 Charles Matthew COLOSIMO, an individual; and Ralph Louis Colosimo, an individual, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SALT LAKE CITY dba Catholic Diocese of Salt Lake City, a Utah corporation sole; Archdiocese of San Francisco, a foreign entity; Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, a foreign entity; Judge Memorial High School Board of Financial Trustees, a Utah corporation
Edward Ray, Jr. v. E. Larapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., No. 19-17093 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:19-cv-01298-EJD E. LARA, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Californi
Kelvin Hernandez Roman v. Chad Wolfpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN; No. 20-55436 BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ; MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on D.C. No. behalf of themselves and all others 5:20-cv-00768- similarly situated, TJH-PVC Plaintiffs-Petitioners-Appellees, v. OPINION CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Hom
Stuve v. Bainganpublic domain
*1222 In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Sandra S. Dozier appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated August 5, 2013, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to reargue his opposition to that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the comp
Doe v. Roman Catholic Bishoppublic domain
Opinion NICHOLSON, Acting P. J. Two priests employed by defendant Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento (the Diocese) molested two young sons of plaintiff Jane Doe and other children about 20 or more years ago. The two priests fled the country—one in 1989, after pleading guilty to child molestation charges unrelated to Doe’s sons, and the other in 1991, after being accused by another family of child molestation
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Jun 10 2019, 8:50 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Walker v. San Francisco Unified School Districtpublic domain
741 F.Supp. 1386 (1990) Albert C. WALKER; Roberta Walker, Leon Ilnicki; Juanita Ilnicki, John C. Soso; Jacklyn C. Soso; Margaret Smith, Alyce Crosdale, and Betty Sands, Plaintiffs, v. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, City and County of San Francisco, State of California; Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California; Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Franc
United States v. Francisco Colorado Cessapublic domain
EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a money-launder-ing-eonspiraey trial. The Los Zetas drug cartel entered the U.S. quarter-horse racing business. Los Zetas used their horse-racing operations to launder money. Four Defendants-Appellants involved in the horse-racing operations were convicted of conspiring to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). The
Vazquez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Roman Vazquez and Francisca Roman, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying Roman Vazquez’s motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the
Vazquez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Roman Vazquez and Francisca Roman, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying Roman Vazquez’s motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the
Roman v. Cook County Sheriff's Merit Boardpublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Roman v. Cook County Sheriff’s Merit Board, 2014 IL App (1st) 123308 Appellate Court GERALDO ROMAN, MANUEL HERRERA, MICHAEL DESENA, Caption JOHN VERNER, FRANCISCO YERENA, HOWARD DAVIS, and MICHAEL CERAMI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COOK COUNTY SHERIFF’S MERIT BOARD and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of
Jenkins, J. *1236In this writ proceeding, we are presented with a narrow question of law concerning the attorney work product privilege as codified in Code of Civil Procedure Section 2018.030.1 Specifically, we are asked to determine, as between an employer law firm and a former attorney employee, who is the hold
GUERRA, RIGOBERTO Jr.public domain
A\ttmrne·'ys at La\W Chase . Bank Of Te~as . - Gulfgate -2900 Woodridge, Suite 202 Houston, Texas 77087 (713) 645-7894 (713) 6
Postoenko v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Roman Ivanovich Postoenko, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial ev
Postoenko v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Roman Ivanovich Postoenko, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial ev
Sheehan v. San Francisco 49ers, Ltd.public domain
WERDEGAR, J., Concurring. I agree with my colleagues that the numerous unresolved factual issues remaining in this case preclude resolution on demurrer and require that we reverse judgment for the San Francisco 49ers (49ers) and remand for further proceedings. But both because of what it says and what it does not say in arriving at that conclusion, I cannot join the majority opinion. I