Cases

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-354-CR JOHN FRANK ANDERSEN A/K/A APPELLANT JOHN FRANK ANDERSON V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRA

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-354-CR JOHN FRANK ANDERSEN A/K/A APPELLANT JOHN FRANK ANDERSON </

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT FRANK MONTE, ) ) Petitioner, )

PITMAN, J. Shelia Marie Anderson Miller ("Shelia"), sister of the decedent, Frank Anderson ("Decedent"), seeks review of the trial court's judgment that nullified the testament in which she had been appointed independent testamentary executrix, denied her exception of res judicata and recalled a judgment of possession previously rendered. She also appeals the trial court's failure to hold contradictory hearings on motions filed and

Laura Carter Higley, Justice Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. sued Hill & Frank, Inc., alleging faulty design and construction of a pool at the top of a parking garage. Kayne Anderson included the affidavit of an engineer to serve as a certificate of merit. Hill & Frank filed a motion to dismiss, alleging the certificate was insufficient. The trial court granted the motion. In its sole issue on appeal, Kayne Anderson ar

PITMAN, J. Shelia Marie Anderson Miller ("Shelia"), sister of the decedent, Frank Anderson ("Decedent"), seeks review of the trial court's judgment that nullified the testament in which she had been appointed independent testamentary executrix, denied her exception of res judicata and recalled a judgment of possession previously rendered. She also appeals the trial court's failure to hold contradictory hearings on motions filed and

23 A.3d 1096 (2011) ANDERSON v. FRANK[30]. No. 1997 EDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. January 31, 2011. Affirmed, Reversed and Remanded. NOTES [30] Petition for reargument denied April 12, 2011.

*577Not Considered. Not timely filed. See La.S.Ct.R. X, § 5(a).

Per Curiam: ¶1 Petitioners are residents of Orem City and Provo City seeking to have a referendum placed on the November 2017 ballot. Despite the fact that Petitioners met the signature threshold needed to put a referendum before the voters, both Orem City and Provo City refused. The Cities concluded, in part, that the resolutions could not be referred to the voters as a matte

08/16/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 2, 2019 Session MARILYN KAY ANDERSON v. JAMES CEPHAS ANDERSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Robertson County No. 74CC2-2015-CV-233 Ross H. Hicks, Judge ___________________________________

GUIDRY, J. The defendant, Tommie Anderson, was charged by bill of information with attempted aggravated rape, a violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes 14:42A(4) and 14:27 (victim under the age of thirteen) (prior to revision by 2015 La. Acts Nos. 184, § 1 and 256, § 1). He entered a plea of not guilty and, following a jury trial, was found guilty of sexual battery, a violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes 14:43.1 (prior to revisio

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-4681 JOSEPH R. GRIEVESON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANK J. ANDERSON,1 Marion County Sheriff, PATRICK COMMISKEY, CHRIS BOOMERSHINE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________

LINDER, S. J. *165In this landlord-tenant case, plaintiff (landlord) brought this contract action against defendants, former tenants (tenants), for unpaid rent and other damages.1 Tenants asserted two counterclaims in response. The first was for damages based on landlord's alleged failure to maintain the dwelling in a habitab

GEATHERS, J.: In this declaratory judgment action, Appellant West Anderson Water District (the District) seeks review of the circuit court’s order interpreting a contract between the District and Respondent City of Anderson, South Carolina (the City) that allowed the City to provide water service to a certain site within the District’s boundaries. The District argues the individuals serving on the District’s governing board at

Sykes, Circuit Judge. Michael Thomas, an Illinois prisoner formerly confined at Hill Correctional Center, alleged that prison guards attacked him with excessive force and that the beating and subsequent disciplinary proceedings were in retaliation for lawsuits and grievances he filed. He sued the guards and other prison officials seeking damages under

755 F.Supp. 187 (1991) Joann ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. 90-CV-70673-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. February 5, 1991. Joann Anderson, Detroit, Mich., in pro. per. Mary S. Rigdon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPIN

110 S.W.3d 98 (2003) Manford Frank ANDERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-02-00640-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. April 15, 2003. Rehearing Overruled August 5, 2003. Frank R. Hughes, Attorney At Law, Greenville, for Appellant. John Roach, Criminal Dist. Atty., Katharine K. Decker, McKinney, for State. Befo

OPINION Scott K. Field, Justice T. Mark Anderson and Christine Anderson, as co-executors of the estate of Ted Anderson (collectively, the Andersons), appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding Richard T. Archer, David *176R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer (collectively, the Archers), $2,56

LUNDSTEN, J. ¶ 1. The question here is whether sentence adjustment under Wis. Stat. § 973.195 is available to reduce confinement time for persons serving an enhanced misdemeanor prison term. As we explain further in the discussion section below, an enhanced misdemeanor prison term is imposed when (1) a defendant is convicted of a misdemeanor and is subject to penalty enhancement, such that a bifurcated sentence under Wis. Stat. §