Cases

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, concurring. My colleagues treat a simple case governed by settled doctrine as if it were complex and novel. Much could be said for their discussion as an original matter, but it is not an original matter. The Supreme Court has held that, without violating the first amendment, a public body may forbid its employees to run for elective office. Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S.

916 F.Supp. 601 (1996) CITIZENS' RIGHT TO VOTE, an Association, Harold Naylor, Robert Cummings, A.A. Cervantes, III, Robert Ledford and Robert A. Nelson, Individually and as Directors of Citizens' Right to Vote, an Association, Richard S. Thomson, David N. Tullos, Joe Venus and Kathryn M. Jones, Plaintiffs, v. J. Ed MORGAN, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi; Charles Lawrence, President and member of the Cou

387 F.3d 210 Lisa Michelle LAMBERT, Appellantv.Charlotte BLACKWELL (Administrator of the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women); The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania. No. 03-2282. No. 03-2383. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 12, 2004. October 12, 2004.

OPINION OF THE COURT CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND.218 A. The Trial .219 1. The Commomoealth’s Case.220 2. Lambert’s Case.223 B. Procedural

250 F.Supp.2d 63 (2003) Frank J. MARGAN, Tammy M. Margan, John M. Margan, and Doreen M. Margan, Individually, and as the Natural Parents and Guardians of Their Infant Children, "A" Margan and "E" Margan; Jeffrey Margan, Paul M. Mahan, Anthony Pellegrino, Eileen Pellegrino, Clark S. Louer and Mary Ellen Louer, Individually, and as the Natural Parents, and Guardians of Their Infant Children, "S" Louer, and "T" Louer; Michael Goguen, and Nancy Goguen, Plain

Filed 2/26/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO VICTAULIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, A146617 v. (Alameda County AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE Super. Ct. No. RG12642929

McHUGH, J.: This matter is before this Court upon the filing of a petition for writ of mandamus by Thornton Cooper, No. 11-1405; petitions for writs of prohibition by Stephen Andes, et al., No. 11-1447 and by the Monroe County Commission, No. 11-1516; and petitions for writs of mandamus by Eldon Callen, et. al, No. 11-1517, and by Thornton Cooper, No. 11-1525. Petitioners Andes and Monroe County Commission challenge the cons

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs, individual voters registered in Wake County, North Carolina and the Raleigh Wake Citizens Association (“RWCA”), an organization dedicated to the interests of African-Americans in Wake County, (collectively “plaintiffs”) challenge the North Carolina General Assembly’s (“General Assembly”) 2013 redistricting plan for electing the Wake Cou

239 Md. 289 (1965) 211 A.2d 328 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY MAULSBY ADDICKS v. WHITE [No. 346, September Term, 1964.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 24, 1965. The cause was argued before HORNEY, MARBURY, SYBERT, OPPENHEIMER and BARNES, JJ. Edwin H.W. Harlan, Jr., and Roger A. Cl

Affirming. James Crawford, Ted Jewell and George Hensley were jointly indicted by the grand jury of Clay County for the wilful murder of Mahan Hoskins. There was some doubt in the mind of the commonwealth attorney as to whether or not a fair and impartial trial could be had in Clay County. Thereupon it was agreed between the commonwealth and the defendants that grounds for a change of venue existed and the court ordered the case transferred to Laurel County for trial. Com. v. Kelly,

MR. JUSTÍCE SANNER delivered the opinion of the court. Dr. Gideon E. Blackburn, of Butte, died intestate on March 24, 1912, leaving some estate, and surviving heirs as follows: Hannah A. Blackburn, his wife, Charles A. Blackburn, a son, and two daughters- On March 29, 1912, Charles A. Blackburn filed in the district court of Silver Bow county a petition for letters of administration of the estate, and also fil

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P

308 F.Supp.2d 346 (2004) Eric RODRIGUEZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. George E. PATAKI et al., Defendants. Howard T. Allen et al., Plaintiffs, v. George E. Pataki et al., Defendants. No. 02 CIV. 618(RMB), 02 CIV. 3239(RMB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 15, 2004. *347 *348</