⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Franklin A Murillo”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 172 F. Supp. 3d 24; 2016 WL 1091059; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36419
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge On January 20, 2016, each of the defendants entered into a wired plea agreement under which they pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment of conspiring to distribute, and possess with intent to distribute, at least five kilograms of cocaine and 100 kilograms of marijuana on board a vessel subject to the jurisd
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 2743
US Bank N.A. v Murillo (2019 NY Slip Op 02743) US Bank N.A. v Murillo 2019 NY Slip Op 02743 Decided on April 10, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju
State v. Murillopublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 198 Wash. App. 1068
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Franklin County, No. 14-1-50337-6, Alex Ekstrom, J., entered June 2, 2015. Remanded with instructions by unpublished opinion per Fearing, C.J., concurred in by Korsmo and Siddoway, JJ.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-12-14 · Published · cited 18× · 153 F. Supp. 3d 130; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175445; 2015 WL 9907796
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Defendants Alfredo Mosquera-Murillo, Joaquin Chang-Rendon, and Antonio Moreno-Membache (collectively, the “defendants”) are charged in a one-count indictment of conspiring to distribute, and possess with intent to distribute, at least five kilograms of cocaine and 100 kilograms of marijuana, on board a vessel subject to the jurisd
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016-06-24 · Published · cited 3× · 197 F. Supp. 3d 1119; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82482; 2016 WL 3919555
ORDER J.P. Stadtmueller, U.S. District Judge On February 18, 2016, the plaintiffs filed suit, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, against the defendants for purportedly engaging in a nationwide marketing scheme that is untrue, deceptive, and misleading to consumers. (See generally Docket #1). In many respects, this action parallels the allegations set forth in a case that was
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-11-23 · Published · cited 12× · 18 F.4th 1105
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30136 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 6:19-cr-00006-SEH-1 KIELAN BRETT FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 192 F. App'x 646
MEMORANDUM ** George Franklin Pelly appeals from the 13-month term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Pelly contends that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 *647L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), requires that senten
Miranda v. Dacruzpublic domain
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2009-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before this Court are two motions in limine filed by Maria Miranda ("Plaintiff"), one motion in limine filed by Francisco and Philomena DaCruz ("Defendants"), and one motion for summary judgment / in limine filed by Defendants. Defendants have not filed an objection to either of Plaintiff's motions. Plaintiff objects to both of Defendants' motions. For the reasons discussed herein, this Cour
State v. Bleapublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 425 P.3d 385
VIGIL, Judge. {1} Defendant Joseph Blea was convicted of multiple counts of first degree criminal sexual penetration and first degree kidnapping involving four separate victims in two separate district court cases, and appeals. In both appeals, cause no. A-1-CA-34986 and A-1-CA-35085, Defendant contends that New Mexico's DNA Identification Act (the Act) NMSA 1978, §§ 29-16-1 to -13 (199
People v. Bastidaspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2017-01-13 · Published · cited 2× · 7 Cal. App. 5th 591; 212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 24
Opinion SIMONS, J. Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted in 2014, reduced certain offenses that could be charged as either felonies or misdemeanors to misdemeanors. And, in newly enacted Penal Code section 1170.18, former subdivision (a),
Gordon v. Johnsonpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 7× · 991 F. Supp. 2d 258; 2013 WL 6905352; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181980
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, and DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 1, 2 & 13) PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a lawful permanent U.S. resident held by the government pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), brought a petition for writ of
Dickinson v. Cosbypublic domain
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-07-26 · Published · cited 33× · 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 350; 37 Cal. App. 5th 1138
BIGELOW, P. J. *1144In 2014, plaintiff Janice Dickinson publicly alleged that defendant William Cosby drugged and raped her in 1982. Cosby responded by issuing a demand letter and several press releases through his attorney, which expressed or implied that Dickinson was lying. Dickinson filed a complaint against Cosby for defamation and rela
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-08-15 · Published · cited 11× · 292 F.R.D. 230; 21 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 45; 2013 WL 4431266; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115188
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs “Motion for a Protective Order to Limit *231Opt-in Depositions and Defendants’ Discovery Demands of the Opt-Ins.” [Doe. No. 186]. The issue to be addressed is the scope of permissible discovery in this conditionally
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-11-16 · Published · cited 19× · 875 F.3d 786
HAYNES, Circuit Judge: When Derrick Smothers, Terrell Smothers, 1 and Thomas Hankton (collectively, “Defendants”) were originally sentenced, each received a sentence reduction for previously serving time on related state charges. Thirteen days after sentencing, the Government request
State v. Moorepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-02-11 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 Ohio 409
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2022-Ohio-409.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2021-CA-26 : v.
State v. Crossleypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-12-11 · Published · cited 3× · 2020 Ohio 6640
[Cite as State v. Crossley, 2020-Ohio-6640.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2020-CA-10 : v.
State v. Vogtpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2002-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 55 P.3d 365; 30 Kan. App. 2d 1138; 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 905
30 Kan. App.2d 1138 (2002) 55 P.3d 365 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JUSTIN VOGT and JACOB GRABER, Appellants. Nos. 87,187, 87,188. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed October 11, 2002. Michael C. Robinson, of Reynolds, Forker, Berkley, Suter, Rose & Graber, of Hutchinson, for appellants. Franklin Terrill Bruce,
Yeh v. Super. Ct.public domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/6/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JAQUELYN YEH et al., Petitioners, A166537 v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Super. Ct. No. MSC22-
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE APPRAISAL OF PANERA ) BREAD COMPANY ) C.A. No. 2017-0593-MTZ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: October 7, 2019 Date Decided: January 31, 2020 Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Elizabeth A. DeFelice, and Melissa N. Donimirski, HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JINAPALA ABEYWARDENE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24- 2353 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan DOUG TULINO, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jinapala Abeywardene, proceedin