Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Frappier v. Countrywide Home Loans”
Frappier v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Frappier v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
STAHL, Circuit Judge. On May 11, 2009, Plaintiff Mark Frappier filed a five-count complaint in the Superior Court of Suffolk County, Massachusetts, alleging various state-law claims related to a mortgage refinancing. Defendant Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (“Countrywide”) removed the case to federal court on diversity grounds. The district court resolved certain claims as a matte
Frappier v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
645 F.3d 51 (2011) Mark FRAPPIER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., Defendant, Appellee. No. 10-2193. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard April 6, 2011. Decided July 7, 2011. *53 Valeriano Diviacchi with whom Diviacchi Law Office was on brief for appellant. Brook L. Am
Richard Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellants Richard and Audrey Haase appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit against multiple defendants. The “Fifth Circuit Court of the United States of America” is among the named defendants in that suit, apparently due to this court’s role in a prior proceeding involving the appellants. The appellants have not filed an opening brief on appeal; instead,
Richard Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inpublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This appeal challenges a district court’s dismissal of Richard and Audrey Haase’s (“the Haases’ ”) claims asserted against two financial entities and a law firm. The controversy stems from the Haases’ home equity loan and their failure to make the required payments on the loan. We find jurisdiction to review, and we AFFIRM all the orders from which
Kyle v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
232 S.W.3d 355 (2007) Jack B. KYLE and Janice M. Kyle, Appellants v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., as servicer for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Appellee. No. 05-06-00304-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 21, 2007. *357 Michael Brinkley, Fort Worth, for appellants. Gregory T. Pratt, Barrett, B
436 B.R. 878 (2010) In re Martin Junius GULLEY, Jr., Debtor. Martin Junius Gulley, Jr., and Loreace Gulley, Plaintiffs, v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-33271-SGJ-13. Adversary No. 08-03467. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. August 23, 2010. *880 Theodore Ohmstede Bartho
660 F.3d 893 (2011) In the Matter of Lawrence David VELAZQUEZ; Tracy Louise Velazquez, Debtors. Lawrence David Velazquez; Tracy Louise Velazquez, Appellees, v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Appellant. No. 10-20609. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 17, 2011. *894 Thomas A. Connop, Thomas F. Loos
Harry v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, Judge. This case arises from a dispute concerning a mortgage on property located at 89 Pimlico Pond in Mashpee, Massachusetts (“the property”). A motion to dismiss filed by defendants Ditech Financial, LLC, f/k/a Green Tree Servicing, LLC (“Ditech”), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) and the Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a the Bank of New York as Trustee
Richard Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inpublic domain
Case: 12-20806 Document: 00512590335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2014 REVISED APRIL 9, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
361 B.R. 831 (2007) In re Caesar R. CAMPBELL; fdba Caesar's Landscaping, et al.; Pamela A. Campbell, Debtors. Caesar R. Campbell, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 06-31321, Adversary No. 06-3476. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 16, 2007. *832
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 8, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01109-CV JAMES RAMEY AND ELLA RAMEY, Appellants V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 157th District Court
Santiago v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. and the Bank of New York Mellon’s “Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support” (ECF No. 32), filed on December 5, 2013 [hereinafter “Motion”]; Plaintiff Jose Santiago’s “Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgme
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00092-CV VAUGHN L. BAILEY AND CELESTE APPELLANTS BAILEY V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. F/K/A APPELLEE BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP ---------- FROM
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00564-CV ____________________ BOBIE KENNETH TOWNSEND, Appellant V. BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, LLP, SHELLEY LUAN DOUGLASS, AND KELLY JIMENEZ, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE,
Robinson v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.public domain
OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), a subsidiary of MERSCORP, Inc., operates an electronic mortgage registration system (“the MERS System”). MERS is distinct from the MERS System. The MERS System is a private electronic database that records the ownership of and servicing rights in home loans. Various
Dill v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Stephen Dill and Abigail Marsters bring this suit against Defendants American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (“AHMSI”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”) arising out of Plaintiffs’ home mortgage loan. Plaintiffs allege that AHMSI mishandled Plaintiffs’ loan modification application u
ACCEPTED 03-15-00522-CV 8023248 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00522-CV Michael W. Schuetz and Jamie K. Schuetz, Appellants v. Source One Mortgage Services Corporation; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engle; Robert Ferguson, and Barbara Ferguson, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT