Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Frederick William Cords, Jr.”
People v. Cordspublic domain
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, *128and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
State of Tennessee v. Frederick Lamont Moorepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 14, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FREDERICK LAMONT MOORE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 09-77 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2009-01266-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 9, 2011 Following a jury trial, the Defendant, Frederick Lamont Moore, was convicted of first degree premed
Otto May, Jr. v. Chrysler Group LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 11-3000 & 11-3109 O TTO M AY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. C HRYSLER G ROUP, LLC, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross Appellant.
Otto May, Jr. v. Chrysler Group LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 11-3000 & 11-3109 O TTO M AY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. C HRYSLER G ROUP, LLC, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appell
Meyers v. JDC/Firethorne, Ltd.public domain
Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, we consider whether the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute between a land developer and a county commissioner. Because an individual county commissioner in Fort Bend County lacks legal authority to receive, process, or present a completed plat application to that county's commissioners court for approval, we hold that the developer has not sho
ACCEPTED 14-15-00860-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 10:4
2 A.3d 526 (2010) AMERICAN AND FOREIGN INSURANCE COMPANY, Royal Insurance Co. of America, Safeguard Insurance Company and Royal Indemnity Company, Appellants v. JERRY'S SPORT CENTER, INC., Jerry's Sport Center Northeast, Inc., Bonitz Brothers, Inc., Outdoor Sports Headquarters, Inc., Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc., National Assoc. for the Advancement of Colored People, National Spinal Cord Injury Assoc., American International Insurance Company, D
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
2 F.Supp.2d 1382 (1998) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 6, 1998. Clifford L. Malone, Adams, Jones, Robinson & Malone, Wichita, KS, Thomas E. Wright, Wright, Henson, Somers, Sebelius, Clark & Baker, LLP, Topeka, KS, Harry L. Najim, Najim Law Offices, Wich
142 F.3d 601 Mark WALDORF, Appellant in No. 97-5195,v.Edward J. SHUTA; Carolyn Wood; Kenneth C. Spence, Jr.;Mary Kay Spence; Borough of Kenilworth; Joseph Rego;Henry J. Moll; Victor Smith; Lawrence Stickle; CharlesDavid; Joseph Ventre; Thomas Neville; William J. Ahern;William E. Conrad; Livio Mancino; Gary Rowinsky; MarioDibella; Vincent Scorese; Harry Grapenthin; Mary Kelly;Richard McCormack; Willia
ACCEPTED 14-15-00860-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
ANNIE REBECCA ELLIOTT DISTRICT CLERK MAILING PHYSICAL 301 Jackson Street 1422 Eugene Heimann Circle Richmond, Texas 77469 Richmond, Texas 77469 FILED IN Te
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
969 F.Supp. 1460 (1997) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 11, 1997. *1461 *1462 *1463 *1464
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
6 F.Supp.2d 1207 (1998) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 3, 1998. *1208 Clifford L. Malone, Adams, Jones, Robinson & Malone, Wichita, KS, Thomas E. Wright, Wright, Henson, Somers, Sebelius, Clark & Baker, L.L.
United States v. Montgomerypublic domain
635 F.3d 1074 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lisa M. MONTGOMERY, Appellant. No. 08-1780. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 22, 2010. Filed: April 5, 2011. *1078 Frederick A. Duchardt, Jr., Trimble, MO, argued (John G. Gromowsky, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
2 F.Supp.2d 1409 (1998) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 23, 1998. Clarifying Order March 24, 1998. *1410 Clifford L. Malone, Adams, Jones, Robinson & Malone, Wichita, KS, Thomas E. Wright, Wright
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
2 F.Supp.2d 1416 (1998) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 27, 1998. *1417 Clifford L. Malone, Adams, Jones, Robinson & Malone, Wichita, KS, Thomas E. Wright, Wright, Henson, Somers, Sebelius, Clark & Baker, L.L
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
6 F.Supp.2d 1192 (1998) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 2, 1998. Clifford L. Malone, Adams, Jones, Robinson & Malone, Wichita, KS, Thomas E. Wright, Wright, Henson, Somers, Sebelius, Clark & Baker, LLP, Topeka, KS, Harry L. Najim, Najim Law offi
ACCEPTED 14-15-00860-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS Appellate Docket Number: 14-15-00860-CV
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
37 F.Supp.2d 1231 (1998) William I. KOCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 85-1636-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 7, 1998. *1232 *1233 *1234 Clifford L. Malone, Adams, Jones, Robinson & Malone, Wi
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, Senior District Judge. This case was filed in 1985. Selection of the jury starts today, April 6, 1998, at 1:30 p.m. This court has shepherded this case since its inception. The plaintiffs seek actual and punitive damages in excess of a billion dollars. On March 20, 1998, the court entered a memorandum and order deciding several of the motions in limine filed by t