Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Fredrick Mack”
MacK Curtis Ivory v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-22-00037-CR MACK CURTIS IVORY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 76th District Court Camp Co
in Re Commitment of Fredrick Robert King Jr.public domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00255-CV ____________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF FREDRICK ROBERT KING JR. _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court
Fredrick v. District of Columbiapublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: Andrew M. Fredrick, Stephen Bias and Michael J. Hairston sued the District of Columbia, alleging that the District had discriminated against black employees of the Metropolitan Police Department, in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.
Fredrick Como, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-98-00049-CR Fredrick Como, Jr., Appellant v.
Curry v. Ada County Highway Districtpublic domain
ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING DONALDSON, Justice. Plaintiffs-respondents brought an action against the defendant-appellant to quiet title to a 10 foot-wide strip of land upon which part of their house rests. The dis*819tnct court was presented with cross-motions for summary judgment. Relying upon a theory of estoppel, the district court gran
State v. Robertsonpublic domain
WILLIAMS, J. liThe defendant, Anthony D. Robertson, was charged by amended bill of indictment with' second degree murder, in violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1, and armed robbery using a firearm, in violation of La. R.S. 14:64 and 14:64.3(A). Following a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to serve life in prison, at hard labor, without the benefit of parole, probation or suspension of senten
Silver Sage Ranch, Inc. v. Lawsonpublic domain
571 P.2d 768 (1977) 98 Idaho 707 SILVER SAGE RANCH, INC., an Idaho Corporation, Appellant, v. Fredrick J. LAWSON, Defendant-Respondent, and Al Harris, Ken Goff, Eugene Skelton, James E. Mack, Shirley Horwitz, Caroll Smith, Skelton Management Farms, Inc., and Skelton Management Co., Inc., Defendants. No. 12217. Supreme Court of Idaho. November 22, 197
325 S.W.3d 318 (2010) STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Carlene SLUSHER, Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Slusher, Deceased, Appellee. No. 2009-SC-000513-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 18, 2010. *319 John Fredrick Vincent, Martin, Justice, Vincent & Lavender, Ashland, KY, Counsel for
State v. Walkerpublic domain
Opinion CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: 1 1 Defendant Fredrick C. Walker appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of sexual abuse of a child. We affirm. *576 BACKGROUND ¶ 2 In September 1984, De
Elsner v. Birchall, M.D.public domain
MARY J. BOYLE, J.: {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Frederick S. Elsner, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial and raises one assignment of error for our review: The trial court erred in denying the Plaintiff's Motion for a New Trial based on juror misconduct and the manifest weight of the evidence. {¶ 2}
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
LEE GABRIEL, Justice, dissenting. The majority opinion, while thorough and meticulously written, strays from the appropriate standard of review as mandated by the supreme court. Because this standard of review dictates a different result, I dissent. I. APPLICABLE STANDARD OF REVIEW AND BURDENS OF PROOF The standard of review and the resultant burdens of proof routinely pre
Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp. v. Brittpublic domain
SALTER, J. *210This is a mesothelioma case originally brought by Dennis Britt and his wife, Rosa-Maria Britt (as to loss of consortium), as plaintiffs ("Mr. and Mrs. Britt"), against Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation ("Northrop"). In 2014, Mr. Britt passed away, and Mrs. Britt (as personal representative of his estate), was substituted for
Jay v. Statepublic domain
503 S.E.2d 563 (1998) 232 Ga. App. 661 JAY v. The STATE. No. A98A0732. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 26, 1998. *564 Robert L. Mack, Jr., Lithonia, for appellant. J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Benjamin M. First, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. HAROLD R. BA
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Etc. v. Brittpublic domain
SALTER, J. This is a mesothelioma case originally brought by Dennis Britt and his wife, Rosa-Maria Britt (as to loss of consortium), as plaintiffs (“Mr. and Mrs. Britt”), against Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (“Northrop”). In 2014, Mr. Britt passed away, and Mrs. Britt (as personal representative of his estate), was substituted for Mr. Britt. Mrs. Britt also amended the c
State v. Horton, 2007-Ca-00085 (12-3-2007)public domain
OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Appellant, Michael Horton, was indicted by the Stark County Grand Jury and charged with one count of murder, in violation of R.C. § 2903.02(A) for the shooting death of Rick E. Joiner. The grand jury included two firearm specifications in the indictment for discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle, R.C. §
Anderson v. City of Massillonpublic domain
[Cite as Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711.] ANDERSON, ADMR., APPELLEE, v. THE CITY OF MASSILLON ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711.] Political-subdivision liability—R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(b)—R.C. 2744.02(B)(1)(b)— Immunity of employees of political subdivisions—Willful, wanton, and reckless misconduct. (No. 2011-0743—Submitted February 8, 2012—Decided D
Albright v. City of New Orleanspublic domain
46 F.Supp.2d 523 (1999) Charles ALBRIGHT, III, et al. v. THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al. Nos. 96-0679, 73-629, 97-2523, 97-3926, 98-3012. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 14, 1999. *524 Frank G. DeSalvo, Frank G. DeSalvo, A Professional Law Corp., New Orleans, LA, for Charles Albright, III, Michael Allsbrook, F
State v. Moorepublic domain
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2020-Ohio-4321.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 19CA13 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY JAMES W. MOORE,
Silva v. Peninsula Hotelpublic domain
509 F.Supp.2d 364 (2007) Hector SILVA, Plaintiff, v. PENINSULA HOTEL and I.U.O.E. Local 94B, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 08261(RJH)(TJK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 13, 2007. *365 Hector Silva, Jersey City, NJ, pro se. Lois M. Traub, Kane Kessler, P.C., Joseph Fredrick Farelli, Pryor Cashman LLP, Mi