Cases

Nebraska Advance Sheets FRIEDMAN v. FRIEDMAN 973 Cite as 290 Neb. 973 2. Dismissal of Determan In their second assignment of error, Appellants challenge the district court’s decision to sustain Determan’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Specifically, they argue that the court erred in its determination that Determan owed no duty to Appellants and thus was an improper party to

DANIEL KELLY, J. *764¶1 In a vigorous dispute over the distribution of Donald and Betty Lou Tikalsky's estate, J. Steven Tikalsky sued his sister, Terry Stevens, to obtain part of the inheritance she received from their parents. His Complaint contains a count labeled "constructive trust," which he deployed against his sister as a cause of actio

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE BENJAMIN A. KAHN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This adversary proceeding is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiffs Charles M. Friedman and Luceil L. Friedman (“Plaintiffs”) on August 31, 2015 [Doc. #89] (“Motion for Summary Judgment”), Luceil L. Friedman’s Affidavit in Support of

DECISION This matter is before the Court for decision following a bench trial. The dispute is between the Plaintiffs, limited partners (Limited Partners) of Quaker Towers Associates (QTA or Partnership), and Defendant Kelly Picerne, Inc. (KP or General Partner), the general partner of QTA. The Limited Partners allege that KP breached the terms of the parties' written Limited Partnership Agreement (LP Agreement) by faili

295 F.Supp.2d 957 (2003) Eli FRIEDMAN, Individually and on behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. RAYOVAC CORPORATION, Thomas H. Lee Partners, Kenneth V. Biller, Kent J. Hussey, David A. Jones, Scott A. Schoen, Stephen P. Shanesy, Thomas R. Shepherd, Randall J. Steward, Warren C. Smith, Jr. and Merrell M. Tomlin,[1] Defendants. Nos. 02-C-0308-C, 02-C-325-C, 02-C-370-C. Unite

Case: 22-1092 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 12/16/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADASA INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2022-1092 ______________________ Appeal from the United Sta

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE McDONALD’S CORPORATION ) STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ) C.A. No. 2021-0324-JTL LITIGATION ) OPINION DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS Date Submitted: December 15, 2022 Date Decided: March 1, 2023 Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackintosh, Rebecca A. Musarra, Vivek Upadhya, Michael D. Bell, GRANT &

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00112-CV ___________________________ DAVID A. SKEELS, Appellant V. JONATHAN T. SUDER, MICHAEL T. COOKE, AND FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE, P.C., Appellees On Appeal from the 2

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ORACLE CORPORATION ) DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: November 7, 2019 Date Decided: December 4, 2019 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, and Christopher P. Quinn, of FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: Randall J. Baron and David A. Knotts, of ROBBIN

(2008) In re FRIEDMAN'S INC., et. al., Debtors. Alan Cohen, as Trustee of the Friedman's Creditor Trust, Plaintiff, v. Morgan Schiff & Co., Inc., Phillip E. Cohen, Sterling Brinkley, Bradley J. Stinn, Victor M. Suglia, and Alston & Bird LLP, Defendants. No. 407CV041. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. January 10, 2008.

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2022 ME 20 Docket: PUC-20-198 Argued: June 2, 2021 Reargued: December 8, 2021 Decided: March 31, 2022 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. Majority: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ. Dissent: CONNORS, HUMPHREY, and HORTON, JJ. GENERAL MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al.

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I regret that I cannot join the majority’s opinion, despite the fact that there are significant points of agreement between us. The majority and I agree that, as the opinion puts it, there is no per se rule for ADA plaintiffs to the effect that they cannot prevail without quantitative evidence of the precise characteristics of the local job market. No one woul

668 F.Supp. 216 (1987) Jack FRIEDMAN, Sidney Greenwald, and the Estate of Sandor Kolitch d/b/a Franklin Nursing Home, Plaintiffs, v. Cesar PERALES, Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Social Services, and David Axelrod, M.D., Commissioner of New York Department of Health, Defendants (Two Cases). Nos. 82 Civ. 5403, 83 Civ. 1506 (RJW). United States District Court, S.D. New York.<

664 F.Supp. 944 (1986) Raymond T. PACHICK, Plaintiff, v. FRIEDMAN'S EXPRESS, INC., Daniel Friedman, Joseph T. Forgach, Teamsters Local Union No. 401 and Francis Belusko, Defendants. Civ. No. 85-0741. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania, Third Circuit. August 29, 1986. *945 Ralph E. Kates, III, Francis G. Wenzel, Jr.,

203 S.W.3d 514 (2006) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant v. CHRIS BURRY, STACEY BURRY, AND, CHRIS BURRY, AS NEXT FRIEND FOR RACHEL BURRY, SARAH BURRY, AND MEGHAN BURRY, MINORS, Appellees No. 2-05-216-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth. Delivered: June 29, 2006. Panel B: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ. OPINION

964 F.Supp. 677 (1997) Calogero CAROLLO, Plaintiff, v. CEMENT AND CONCRETE WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL PENSION PLAN, and the Board of Trustees of the Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Pension Plan, Defendants. No. 96 CV 3152. United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 19, 1997. *678 *67

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 06-1181 TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMA AG and NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.,

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge KING joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Stowe-Pharr Mills, Inc. (Stowe-Pharr) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title I of the Civil Righ

718 P.2d 551 (1985) 110 Idaho 640 LEWISTON PRE-MIX CONCRETE, INC., an Idaho corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. John B. ROHDE and Clarice A. Rohde, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Respondents. No. 14776. Court of Appeals of Idaho. August 2, 1985. Review Denied September 30, 1985.