Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Friend v. The Hertz Corporation”
Friend v. Hertz Corp.public domain
ORDER In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hertz v. Friend, 559 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1181, — L.Ed.2d - (2010), the order of the district court granting plaintiffs motion to remand is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Hertz.
Friend v. Hertz Corp.public domain
ORDER In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hertz v. Friend, 559 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1181, — L.Ed.2d - (2010), the order of the district court granting plaintiffs motion to remand is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Hertz.
Hertz Corp. v. Friendpublic domain
Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court. The federal diversity jurisdiction statute provides that “a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business.” 28 U. S. C. § 1332(c)(1) (emphasis added). We seek here to resolve differen
Friend v. Hertz Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM * Hertz’s Notice of Appeal makes clear that Hertz removed this class action under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c). Therefore, even assuming we lack authority “to accept an appeal from the denial of a motion to remand when a class action has been removed to federal court on the basis of traditional diversity jurisdiction,” Saab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 469 F.3
Ponds Ex Rel. Poole v. Hertz Corp.public domain
158 P.3d 369 (2007) Jasmine PONDS, by and through her Natural Mother and Next Friend, Claressa POOLE, on behalf of the Heirs of Fred Ponds, deceased, Appellants, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, Hertz Vehicles, L.L.C., and Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., Appellees, and Buckeye State Mutual Insurance Co., and American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Defendants. No. 96,543. Court of Appeals of Kan
Hodges v. Hertz Corp.public domain
Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge This is a wrongful death action arising out of the death of Neil Lewis who was killed during an incident on July 7, 2015. Plaintiff Tiffany Hodges is the guardian ad litem to Lewis's minor children and sole heirs, D. Lewis and J. Lewis. Plaintiffs Karen Joyce Lewis and Alfredo Lewis are Lewis's parents. Plaintiffs filed this survival and wrongful death action against Defendants The Hertz
Hertz v. Carotherspublic domain
225 P.3d 571 (2010) Sidney HERTZ, Appellant, v. Dan CAROTHERS, Appellee. No. S-13245. Supreme Court of Alaska. February 12, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 10, 2010. *572 Sidney R. Hertz, pro se, Seward. Marilyn J. Kamm, Assistant Attorney General, Richard A. Svobodny, Acting Attorney General, Juneau, for App
Sara C. Crowe, by and Through L. L. Crowe, as Next Friend, and Donald Cox v. The Hertz Corporationpublic domain
TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a personal liability damage suit arising out of an injury suffered by the appellant in the Bahama Islands while she was riding in an automobile driven by the defendant, Donald Cox, rented by the latter from the local Hertz Rent-A-Car station. The appeal is joi
Hertz Corp. v. Gleasonpublic domain
MAY, J. The defendant appeals a new trial order entered after a jury found the plaintiff had not sustained injury as the result of an accident in which the defendant stipulated to liability. The defendant seeks reversal of the order and reinstatement of the jury verdict. Alternatively, the defendant requests that the new trial be limited to damages for orthopedic and soft tissue injuries. We grant the alternative relief re
Rosenwald v. Kimberly-Clark Corporationpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUDAH ROSENWALD; CINDY No. 24-299 RUTTER, on Behalf of Themselves D.C. No. and All Others Similarly Situated; 3:22-cv-04993-LB CRAIG CHOURAKI-LEWIN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATIO
Hertz Corp. v. Richardspublic domain
AQUILINO LOPEZ, Jr., Associate Judge. Dorothy G. Richards and Ronald C. Richards and their son, Ronald J. Richards, a minor, filed suit on account of personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident against The Hertz Corporation, the owner of an automobile which had allegedly collided with their motor vehicle. The Hertz Corporation who had rented the automobile to Gerald McGee and who is not a party to this suit, file
Bossons v. the Hertz Corporationpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. This action was brought by Robert Bossons to recover for personal injuries he sustained in an accident which occurred on *Page 31 March 24, 1965. At the time of the accident, plaintiff, a football coach in the employ of the University of Minnesota, was engaged in an athletic recruiting trip. Upon his arrival at
Stuart v. Hertz Corporationpublic domain
302 So.2d 187 (1974) Frank M. STUART, M.D., P.A., and Underwriters at Lloyds, Petitioners, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, George Holbrook, Individually and As Father and Next Friend and Guardian Ad Litem of Stafford Holbrook, a Minor, Respondents. No. 74-178. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 27, 1974. Rehearing Denied November 19, 1974
Hertz Corp. v. Government Employees Insurancepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Williams, J. On August 7, 1990, Lois Giles and her aunt, Pecóla Stringer, rented a van from the Hertz Corporation for 10 days in order to transport family members to a family reunion in Georgia. At the Hertz rental location on West 77th Street in Manhattan, it was determined that the rental would be placed on Ms. Giles’s credit card since Ms. Stringer’s credit card limit had been reach
Schofield v. Hertz Corp.public domain
201 Ga. App. 830 (1991) 412 S.E.2d 853 SCHOFIELD v. HERTZ CORPORATION. A91A1451. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 30, 1991. Reconsideration Denied November 18, 1991. Scott B. Parks, for appellant. Gerard & Mathews, William T. Gerard, for appellee. POPE, Judge. On May 1, 1989,
USCA11 Case: 23-10151 Document: 75-1 Date Filed: 10/22/2024 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10151 ____________________ HAVANA DOCKS CORPORATION,
Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CBS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2018-2256 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:13-cv-00270-JRG
Lewis v. Hertz Corp.public domain
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered on June 27, 1991, which granted defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the first, second, fourth, seventh and ninth causes of action, and denied plaintiff’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment on the first, second and third causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Order of the same court and Justice, entered on Octo
Hertz Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardpublic domain
724 A.2d 395 (1999) HERTZ CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (JOHNSON), Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs October 30, 1998. Decided January 11, 1999. *396 Deborah L. Hartwell, Philadelphia, for petitioner. No appearance entered on behalf of respondent. Be
Steinhauser v. Hertz Corporationpublic domain
421 F.2d 1169 Cynthia STEINHAUSER, an infant, by Carl P. Steinhauser, her guardian ad litem, and Carl P. Steinhauser, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The HERTZ CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of Delaware authorized to do business in New York, and Louis J. Ponzini, Defendants-Appellees. No. 381. Docket 33946. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circ