⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Friends of Buckingham v. State Air Pollution Control”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-01-07 · Published · cited 14× · 947 F.3d 68
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1152 FRIENDS OF BUCKINGHAM; CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, Petitioners, v. STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD; RICHARD D. LANGFORD, Chair of the State Air Pollution Control Board; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTA
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020-06-03 · Published · cited 4× · 961 F.3d 34
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1794 TOWN OF WEYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS; ROBERT HEDLUND, Mayor of Town of Weymouth; PATRICK M. O'CONNOR, State Senator; MICHAEL SMART, Vice President District Six; KENNETH J. DIFAZIO, District Three Councilor; JANE HACKETT, Councilor at Large; ED HARRINGTON, District Five Councilor; REBECCA HAUGH, District One Councilor; ARTHUR MATHEWS, District Four Councilor; MICHAEL MOLISSE, Councilor
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1082 Doc: 85 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1039 WILD VIRGINIA; SIERRA CLUB; APPALACHIAN VOICES; WILDERNESS SOCIETY; PRESERVE CRAIG; SAVE MONROE; INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2023-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00395-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Texas LNG Brownsville, LLC, Appellants v. Vecinos Para El Bienestar De La Comunidad Costera, and City of Port Isabel, Texas, Appellees FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
District Court, D. Nevada · 2004-03-11 · Published · cited 4× · 310 F. Supp. 2d 1168; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5179; 2004 WL 614814
310 F.Supp.2d 1168 (2004) SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (USDOT); Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta; Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); Administrator of FHWA Mary Peters; Division Administrator of FHWA Nevada Division, John Price, Defendants. No. CV-S-02-0578-PMP RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. March 11, 2004.
Sierra Club v. LDEQpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-04-29 · Published · cited 8× · 100 F.4th 555
Case: 23-60234 Document: 142-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60234 FILED
C. Cole v. PA DEPpublic domain
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Clifford Cole, Pamela West, : Brian Weirback, Kathy Weirback, : Todd Shelly and Christine Shelly, : Petitioners : : v. : No. 1577 C.D. 2019 : Argued: September 16, 2020 Pennsylvania Department of : Environmental Protection,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-04-03 · Published · cited 7× · 64 F.4th 487
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1008 Doc: 92 Filed: 04/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 34 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1008 SIERRA CLUB; WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION; WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY; INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION; APPALACHIAN VOICES;
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-01-25 · Published · cited 6× · 24 F.4th 915
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1039 Doc: 89 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1039 WILD VIRGINIA; SIERRA CLUB; APPALACHIAN VOICES; WILDERNESS SOCIETY; PRESERVE CRAIG; SAVE MONROE; INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1039 WILD VIRGINIA; SIERRA CLUB; APPALACHIAN VOICES; WILDERNESS SOCIETY; PRESERVE CRAIG; SAVE MONROE; INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; JIM HUBBA
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 685; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175238; 2014 WL 7335170
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction seeking to preliminarily enjoin Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”) from carrying out any activities that will implement its decision to retire Paradise Units 1 and 2 and construct a new gas-powered generating facility and accompanying gas transport infrast
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015-02-03 · Published · cited 1× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 703; 2015 WL 461402
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record [DN 32, DN 46], Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. I. BACKGROUND On February 16, 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued regulations known as the Mercury and Air Toxics Stan
District Court, E.D. California · 2018-02-06 · Published · cited 3× · 304 F. Supp. 3d 916
Lawrence J. O'Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center ("CSERC") and Sierra Forest Legacy (together, "Plaintiffs") bring this suit against Defendants Jeanne M. Higgins (now former Forest Supervisor for the Stanislaus National Forest), Stanislaus National Forest, and the U.S. Forest Service ("Forest Service") (together,
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 10× · 140 F. Supp. 3d 1123; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143521; 2015 WL 6389741
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Remaining Claims, filed February 10, 2015 (Doc. 144) (“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on May 21, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Plaintiffs who suffer no economic injury can establish standing; ‘ (it) whether th
District Court, E.D. New York · 1984-09-25 · Published · cited 214× · 597 F. Supp. 740; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23337
597 F.Supp. 740 (1984) In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 381. United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 25, 1984 as Modified. *741 *742 *743 Stephen J. Schlegel, Schlegel & Trafelet, Ltd., Chicago, Ill.; Benton Musslewhite,