Cases

689 A.2d 106 (1997) 114 Md. App. 108 Marie BOYD, et al. v. Thomas E. HICKMAN, et al. No. 663, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 21, 1997. *108 Charles Mentzer (Judith Stainbrook on the brief), Westminster, MD, for appellants. Betty S. Sconion, Assistant Attorney Genera

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge. This appeal is from a judgment holding the defendant in contempt for refusing to obey the District Judge’s order requiring the defendant, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to produce written statements of witnesses obtained by its claim agent. The specific question presented is whether the District Judge has abused his discretion by finding that the plaintiff had

297 F.2d 921 The GUILFORD NATIONAL BANK OF GREENSBORO, Administratorc.t.a., d.b.n., of the Estate of Joseph M. Coble,Deceased, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant and Third-PartyPlaintiff, Appellant, v. Garland BATCHELOR,Executor of the Estate of Annie J.Coble, Deceased, Third-PartyDefendant, Appellee. No. 8381. United States Court of Appeals Fo

SUBSTITUTE OPINION ON REHEARING Kevin Jewell, Justice We withdraw our opinion dated June 8, 2017, and issue this substitute opinion. Appellants Camil Kreit, M.D., and Samir Kreit, M.D.’s motion for rehearing is overruled. Brothers Camil and Samir Kreit appeal the .trial court’s final judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. for fees due under a

[Cite as State ex rel. Gideon v. Page, 2024-Ohio-1219.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [State ex rel.] Mark R. Gideon, : Relator, : No. 23AP-492 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) The Honorable Jaiza N. Page et al., : Responden

09/29/2023 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 5, 2022 Session ROBERT CROTTY, ET AL. v. MARK FLORA, M.D. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 17C614 Joe P. Binkley, Jr., Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 1, 2016 Session SANDRA KAY CLARY v. DEIDRA A. MILLER, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County No. 2016-CV-17 Jonathan L. Young, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2016-00794-COA-R3-CV – Filed August 8, 2017 ____________________

316 S.W.3d 715 (2010) Raul NAVARRO, Doris Navarro, Virgina B. Abney, Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (A Federally Recognized Indian Tribe), Amarillo Financial Freedom I, LP, Amarillo Financial Freedom, Inc., Americo Acosta, Marquita Adamson, John H. and Dorothy P. Alexander, Raquel Avalos, John G. Alvarado, James R. Bailey, Bill J. and Betty L. Barker, Billy Barnes, Harvey A. and Babara S. Baycroft, Charles L. and Margaret D. Bechtold, Deborah A. Bench,

Sharon G. Lee, J. The Tennessee Health Care Liability Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-121(a)(1) (2012 & Supp. 2017), requires a person who asserts a potential health care liability claim to give written pre-suit notice of the claim to each health care provider that will be named a defendant at least sixty days before the complaint is filed. The question we address is whe

Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge This cause is before the Court on the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 53) and the Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 59). The motions are fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Defendant's motion and GRANTS the Plaintiff's motion for the reasons set forth below. The Court also

WOOD, Chief Judge. Underlying this insurance dispute is a regrettably common tale of greed and dishonesty. Telamon, an Indiana telecommunications firm, engaged Juanita Berry to work for it from 2005 to 2011 as its Vice President of Major Accounts. Berry used that position to steal over $5 million from the firm. Upon discovering this loss, Tela-mon then turned to two insurance po

[Cite as Maas v. Maas, 2020-Ohio-5160.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JOSEPH R. MAAS, Individually and : APPEAL NO. C-190536 Derivately on behalf of JTM Provisions TRIAL NO. A-1705836 Company, Inc., : O P I N I O N. Plaintiff-Appellee,

[Cite as State v. Holland, 2013-Ohio-904.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J.

Haddad, Judge. {¶ 1} This cause is before the court on separate motions for attorney fees filed by the defendants Mark Wilder and Mort Simpson. Upon consideration of the oral arguments of the parties, the evidence presented in the pending case, and pursuant to the Relief from Stay issued by the bankruptcy court, the court now renders the following decision. FINDINGS OF FACT {¶ 2} The first

Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff and defendant in this matter are divorced parents of an autistic son who has special needs. Both acknowledged that he likely would never be emancipated. At the time of their divorce, the parents negotiated a property settlement agreement (PSA) that deferred some issues about their son for a later date. Several years later when their

T.C. Memo. 2020-27 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DUNG T. LE AND NGHIA T. TRAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 2108-16. Filed February 26, 2020. Robert B. Creager, for petitioners. Lisa Kathryn Hunter and Shaina E. Boatright, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION PARIS, Judge: In a notice of d

Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: We granted, in a prior order, rehearing en bane in this appeal. In a separate order, filed concurrently with this opinion, -we scheduled en banc oral argument for the week o

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced appeal seeks reversal of a Final Judgment by Chief Bankruptcy Judge Jeff Bohm,1 in a case addressing an issue of first impression, requiring Appellant Gregory D. Hawk (“Hawk”) to pay Chapter 7 Trustee Eva S. Engelhart (“the Trustee”) $129,895.76 because he withdrew exempt retirement funds after no pa

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge. On June 18, 2008, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company [Fidelity] wrote a letter informing me of a discovery dispute concerning plaintiffs’ request for production of documents. The parties, failing to resolve the issue on their own, have requested my intervention. Each party has submitted statements of their discovery positions, which I have reviewed.