⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Fu Bang Group Corp, USA”

District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 11 F. Supp. 3d 824; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43079; 2014 WL 1315647
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. This case is before the Court on Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Inteplast Group, Ltd.’s (“Inteplast”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 52] (“In-teplast’s Motion for Summary Judgment”) and on Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Chih Shen Chen’s (“Gary Chen”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 55] (“Gary Chen’s Motion for Summa
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 24-14048 Document: 59-1 Date Filed: 08/10/2026 Page: 1 of 22 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-14048 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ JOHN H. OWOC,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-01-12 · Published · cited 16× · 156 F. Supp. 3d 462; 2016 WL 154119
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. These cases involve allegations of market manipulation in a commodities deriva*469tives market, specifically, the market in silver futures calendar spreads. Plaintiffs, sophisticated individual commodities traders, allege that defendants (collectively, “JP Morgan”) manipulated the settlement p
Strickler v. Greenepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-06-17 · Published · cited 4419× · 144 L. Ed. 2d 286; 119 S. Ct. 1936; 527 U.S. 263; 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4191
Justice Souter, with whom Justice Kennedy joins as to Part II, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I look at this ease much as the Court does, starting with its view in Part III (which I join) that StricMer has shown cause to excuse the procedural default of his Brady claim. Like the Court, I think it clear that the materials withheld were exculpatory as devasta
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DEREK WARREN LOGUE, Appellant, v. LAUREN FRANCES BOOK, Appellee. No. 4D18-1112 [June 24, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Ka
Watson v. Edelenpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2015-01-05 · Published · cited 4× · 76 F. Supp. 3d 1332; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 658; 2015 WL 58808
ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated November 18, 2014. (Doc. 166). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo d
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007-01-22 · Published · cited 45× · 136 Wash. App. 751; 150 P.3d 1147
*756¶1 King County hired Frank Coluccio Construction Co., Inc. (FCCC), as general contractor for a public works project involving construction of a small utility tunnel under the Duwamish Waterway. FCCC hired Donald B. Murphy Contractors, Inc. (DBM), as a subcontractor. DBM was responsible for constructing an access shaft at the eastern end of the tunnel. Problems arose during construction, includi
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-15-00188-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 6/11/2015 4:48:09 PM
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-07-03 · Published · cited 491× · 106 L. Ed. 2d 410; 109 S. Ct. 3040; 492 U.S. 490; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3290; 57 U.S.L.W. 5023
492 U.S. 490 (1989) WEBSTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, ET AL. v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES ET AL. No. 88-605. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 26, 1989 Decided July 3, 1989 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT *496 William L. Webster, Attorney General of
State v. Pikepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED JULY SESSION, 1997 November 26, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9611-CR-00408 ) Appellee, ) )
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 NO. CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH
State v. Landanopublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994-02-25 · Published · cited 20× · 637 A.2d 1270; 271 N.J. Super. 1
271 N.J. Super. 1 (1994) 637 A.2d 1270 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VINCENT JAMES LANDANO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 18, 1994. Decided February 25, 1994. *3 Before Judges BAIME, CONLEY and VILLANUEVA. Neil Mullin arg
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-06-05 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 5573168 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/5/2015 10:24:41 PM JEF
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
SV.n: vr 'Te:x..-6 QIAp!BS k. !IJ\I.QUFFI JR. § AKA • CHART IE MUOQPF § v. § CASE NO. 03~13-00723-CR Ct+A~ A.. '(\1\A,t..<>oR"; J"f<. §
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-00861-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/16/2015 4:04:22 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00004-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/28/2015 8:27:19 AM
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00266-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/15/2015 11:43:07 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00774-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:53:36
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
December 22, 2014 Justice Sharon Keller Presiding Judge Court of Criminal Appeals RECEIVED IN P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Austin, TX 78711 This document contains some JAN 0 5 Z015 RE: 03-13-00723CR D-1-DC-13-904021A pages that ar~ of p~or quality ""'"" A osta, Clerk at the t