Cases

FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MCFADDEN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 11, 2022

310 Ga. 72 FINAL COPY S20A0758. THE STATE v. WHEELER. WARREN, Justice. In the early morning hours of March 15, 2017, a fire broke out in a unit of the Venetian Hills apartment complex, resulting in the death of tenant George Hughes. Police investigated the fire, identified Kamara Wheeler as an arson suspect, and on March 18, 2017, arrested her on an unrelated warrant. When officers interviewed Wheeler about the apartment fire,

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Beibei Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the April 18, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the August 31, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“U”) Robert D. Weisel, denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Beibei Zhang, No. A076 106 064 (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2007), aff'g

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Beibei Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the April 18, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the August 31, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“U”) Robert D. Weisel, denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Beibei Zhang, No. A076 106 064 (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2007), aff'g

OPINION McKEE, Circuit Judge. Abrao DeAlmeida petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals reversing the Immigration Judge’s grant of relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). For reasons stated below, we will deny the petition. I. Since we write primarily for the parties, we need not reiterate the factual or procedura

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., RICKMAN and REESE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 9, 2020

OPINION WEIS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Carrol Morgan is subject to an Order of Removal pursuant to section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), as a resident alien who has been convicted of drug offenses classified as “aggravated” felonies. Petitioner c

Branch, Judge. This appeal arises out of a right-of-way owned by Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and bisecting a parcel of land owned by C. Randall Fox. After the railroad constructed a passing side track running parallel to the existing track situated in the right-of-way, Fox sued Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railroad Company

HARRELL, J. Following a sixteen-day trial (4-29 October 2010) of consolidated cases, a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted Petitioner, Jamaal Garvin Alexis (“Alexis”), in the first case (CT08-0504X), of second-degree murder and robbery with a dangerous weapon of Raymond Brown, use of a handgun in the commiss

KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners, four children of Salvadoran and Honduran origin and their mothers, appear before us for a second time to challenge their expedited orders of removal. In Castro v. United States Department of Homeland Security , 835 F.3d 422

Laurence, J. On the second day of the trial of the defendant on a charge of trafficking in 24.49 grams of cocaine1 both sides rested and presented their summations. The jury were then properly instructed by the trial judge that the sole contested issue was whether the Commonwealth had proved beyond a *753reasonable doubt that the defendant had

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 17-2159 _______________ WENDY AMPARO OSORIO-MARTINEZ Individually and on behalf of her minor child, D.S.R.-O., and all others similarly situated; CARMEN ALEYDA LOBO MEJIA, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, A.D.M.-L., and all other similarly situated; MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ

LEAHY, J. “[Mjodern cell phones ... are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy.” Riley v. California, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2484, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014).

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Oyenike Alaka petitions for review of a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). We conclude that it erred in affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) that Alaka was ineligible for withholding of removal as a person convicted of a “particularly serious crime.” According

HARTIGAN, District Judge. This matter was heard on the motion to. dismiss of Patrick J. Monahan, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees’' Compensation Commission for the First Compensation District, the petition to review of John Shalpak of a compensation order filed by the Deputy Commissioner charged with the administration of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’' Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C. A. § 901

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-18-2006 Alaka v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Prec