Cases

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 814 (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 732 WAREHOUSE, PROCESSING, DISTRIBUTION WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 26, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HUGO NEU PROLER COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. B114148. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five. July 21, 1998. Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, James G. Varga and James Rutkowski, Lo

KRUMENACKER III, J., This case arises out of an alleged breach of a commercial lease agreement entered into by the parties on January 5,1968 and alleged tortious interference with contractual relations. The lease was for one of two anchor store spaces in the Park Village Plaza, a strip mall being built by plaintiff PVC near Hershey, Pennsylvania. The other anchor was to be a department store located at the opposite end o

23-7612 Gimpel v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2024 (Argued: December 5, 2024 Decided: September 29, 2025) Docket No. 23-7612 SALAMON GIMPEL, ROSEWOOD FUNERAL HOME, Lead Plaintiffs–Appellants,

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I EVELYN RODRÍGUEZ AVILÉS Apelación Procedente del Apelante Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de P

ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Smartling, Inc. ("Smartling") and Defendant Skawa Innovation Ltd. ("Skawa") are both translation technology companies that provide language translation services for mobile and internet-based clients.1 On November 4, 2015, Smartling filed its First Amended Complaint asserting six causes of action against Skawa for alleged acts of trademark and trade dres

*416 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) addressing Interve-nor Plaintiff Hana Financial, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment against: New Trend Apparel Inc., JCM Inc., Kisum Louie, and Byunglim Louie (the “Ne

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO PLAINTIFF’S FEDERAL COPYRIGHT CLAIM AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE LAW CLAIM; DENYING MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DATES AS MOOT MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE World, Inc., Sidney Kimmel Entertainment, LLC,- Filmdistrict Pictures, LLC, Lakeshore Entertainment Co

CATHELL, J. This case arises from the denial of a motion for preliminary injunction. On May 7, 2004, Eastside Vend Distributors, Inc. (“Eastside”), petitioner, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. (“CCE”), The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (“PBG”), and Mars *223Super Markets, Inc. (“Mars”). As relevant to this part

MEMORANDUM OPINION C. LYNWOOD SMITH, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff, Sheba Rhodes, asserts claims against defendant, The Arc of Madison County, Inc., for wrongful termination in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”), and for negligent hiring, training, supervision, and retention in violation of state law. This action is before the court on thr

525 F.Supp.2d 558 (2007) Louis Vuitton MALLETIER, Plaintiff, v. DOONEY & BOURKE, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 2990(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 13, 2007. *559 *560 *561 Steven Kimelman, Esq., Michael A. Grow, Esq., Alison

29 F.Supp.2d 878 (1998) S INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. JL AUDIO, INC.; Musicar; Accent Marketing; and Wayne Brown, Defendants. No. 96 C 4659. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 9, 1998. *879 *880 *881

306 B.R. 43 (2004) In re AMES DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 01-42217 (REG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 26, 2004. *44 *45 *46 *47 Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, by Martin J. Bienenst

301 F.Supp.2d 612 (2003) EL AGUILA FOOD PRODUCTS INC., et al Plaintiffs, v. GRUMA CORPORATION, Individually d/b/a Mission Foods Corporation, et al Defendants. No. CIV.A. H-03-0427. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. December 23, 2003. *613 *614 Alton C. Todd, Attorney

188 B.R. 651 (1995) In re GVF CANNERY, INC., dba Garden Valley Foods, a California corporation, Debtor. Ed SILVA, dba Ed Silva Farms, Plaintiff, v. GVF CANNERY, INC., dba Garden Valley Foods; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 91-57000-ASW. Adv. No. 92-5059. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California. September 29, 1995.

882 F.Supp. 1508 (1995) Rosalie BRADFORD and Robert S. Bradford v. AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. Civ. A. No. 94-6536. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 17, 1995. *1509 Nina E. Perris, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs. Slade R. Metcalf, New York City, Marc J. Zucker, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.</

OPINION MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: This is a suit for the refund of taxes in the amount of $94,702,599 paid by taxpayer following the disallowance of deductions by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for business losses arising out of the alleged abandonment of intangible assets in tax years 1972 through 1978. In the alternative taxpayer contends it is entitled to a capital loss if the court finds the d

917 S.W.2d 391 (1996) TRI-STATE WHOLESALE ASSOCIATED GROCERS, INC., Appellant, v. Robert BARRERA, Appellee. No. 08-94-00335-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. February 15, 1996. Rehearing Overruled March 13, 1996. *393 Michael D. McQueen, Kemp, Smith, Duncan & Hammond, El Paso, for Appellant. Ben

144 N.J. 84 (1996) 675 A.2d 1077 RUSSO FARMS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; RFC CONTAINER CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; THOMAS RUSSO; EVA RUSSO, HIS WIFE; PASQUALE RUSSO; MARIO RUSSO; ESTATE OF PASQUALE RUSSO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. VINELAND BOARD OF EDUCATION; CITY OF VINELAND; GLENN A. KAHLEY; ART ANDERSON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND LIPPINCOTT ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION; DANIEL

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON: DEFENDANT SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (doc SO); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT OF GENE DENISON (doc 71); and PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (doc 121) JAMES S. STARZYNSKI, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Sun Life Insurance Company (“Sun Life” or “Defendant”)(d

242 N.J. Super. 83 (1990) 576 A.2d 28 ENERTRON INDUSTRIES, INC., AND FRIGID, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DAVID C. MACK, ACTING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 28, 1990. Decided June 25, 1990