Cases

Hopkins v. MWR Mgmt. Co., 2017 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 15 CVS 697 BRANDON HOPKINS, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MWR MANAGEMENT COMPANY d/b/a MICHAEL WALTRIP RACING a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

MEMORANDUM PADOVA, District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...134 II. BACKGROUND ...134 III. THE CLASS CERTIFICATION RECORD .. .135 A. Background Regarding Ocwen’s In-House Balloon Loan Modifications and its Documentation Systems ... 135 B. The Class Representatives ... 136 1. Plaintiffs Li

SiteLink Software, LLC v. Red Nova Labs, Inc., 2018 NCBC 87. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 14 CVS 9922 SITELINK SOFTWARE, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER & OPINION ON v. MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. This case is now before the court on a motion for summary judgment (“the Motion”) (Doc. 54), filed on January 15, 2015 by defendant Interveston Food Services, LLC (“Interveston”), the only remaining defendant1 in this case. Interveston seeks summary judgment in its favor on the only remaining claims

ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAUL C. HUCK, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant Trinity Yachts LLC (“Defendant” or “Trinity”) seeks summary judgment in its favor with respect to each of Plaintiff Merle Wood and Associates, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “MWA”) claims set forth in MWA’s Second Amended Complaint (

POOLER, Circuit Judge: Dorian Cheeks appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from the refusal of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Joanna Seybert, J.) to enter the parties’ stipulation of settlement dismissing, with prejudice, Cheeks’ claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law. The district court held that parties cannot enter into private settleme

Case: 14-11007 Date Filed: 03/16/2018 Page: 1 of 51 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-11007 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-03132-SCJ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMIS

671 F.Supp.2d 753 (2009) TRITON MARINE FUELS, LTD. v. M/V PACIFIC CHUKOTKA. Case No. JFM-06-CV-3346. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 30, 2009. *756 Geoffrey S. Tobias, Ober Kaler Grimes and Shriver PC, Baltimore, MD, for Triton Marine Fuels, Ltd. Robert Brooke Hopkins, Duane Morris LLP, Baltimore, MD, f

14‐299‐cv Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2014 6 7 (Argued: November 14, 2014 Decided: August 7, 2015) 8 9 Docket No. 14‐299‐cv 10 11 ____________________ 12 1

Spent Nuclear Fuel; Partial Breach of Contract; Damages; Causation; Rer-acking Costs; Cask Loading Costs; Crane Upgrade Costs; Fuel Handling Building Modification Costs; General Project Management Costs; NRC Fees; Allegedly Unsupported Transactions. OPINION AND ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT WILLIAMS, Judge. This spent nuclear fuel

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. RALLON, District Judge. This case involves claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Alabama Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 18). On June 14, 2013, the magistrate judge assigned this case entered a Report and Rec

FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a Clean Air Act (“CAA”) citizen suit brought by Plaintiffs-Appellants Environment Texas Citizen Lobby Incorporated and Sierra Club (“Plaintiffs”) against ExxonMobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Chemical Company, and ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Company (collectively, “Exxon”). Exxon owns and operates an industrial comple

LEIGH MARTIN MAY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment [64] and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [68]. After due consideration, the Court enters the following Order. I. BACKGROUND The Court provided a detailed general background on the facts of this case in its Order on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, wh

Enoch Silver, III v. Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Inc., et al., No. 3491, September Term 2018. Opinion by Kehoe, J. Civil Procedure — Class Actions — Standard of Review: Maryland appellate courts exercise de novo review to determine whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standard in granting or denying class certification. Appellate courts review the circuit court’s ultimate decision to grant or deny class certification for abuse of discretion. Civil Procedure — Class Actions

Plasman v. Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., 2016 NCBC 78. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION CATAWBA COUNTY 12 CVS 2832 CHRISTIAN G. PLASMAN, in his individual capacity and derivatively for the benefit of, on behalf of and right of nominal party BOLIER & COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DECCA FURNITURE (USA), INC., DECCA CONTRACT FURNITURE, LLC

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0283p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ┐ INTERIM FINAL RULE: COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING; EMERGENCY │ TEMPORARY STANDARD

Kingsdown, Inc. v. Hinshaw, 2016 NCBC 16. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION ALAMANCE COUNTY 14 CVS 1701 KINGSDOWN, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. W. ERIC HINSHAW, REBECCA HINSHAW, and ANNE RAY, Defendants. ANNE RAY, ORDER & OPINION

Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge IKUTA; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI. MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs allege that Wal-Mart, Inc., discriminates against women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After detailed briefing and hearing, the district court certified a class encompassing all women employed by Wal-Mart at any time aft