Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GALLO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”
Gallo v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEXANDER GALLO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-03298 (TNM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, the District of Columbia banned landlords from evicting their tenants.
Gallo v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEXANDER GALLO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-03298 (TNM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION A century ago, Congress limited D.C. landlords’ rights to evict tenants due to the exigencies of World War I. Bloc
Gallo v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEXANDER GALLO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:21-cv-03298 (TNM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Alexander Gallo owns and rents condos in the District of Columbia. His business took a hit during the pandemic when th
Gallo v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GALLO HOLDINGS LLC – SERIES 1, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-cv-1358 (CRC) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Some landlords bristle at rent control, but not every frustration with the system amounts to a consti
Gallo v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEXANDER GALLO Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-01358 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Alexander Gallo beneficially owns a rent-controlled apartment in Washington, D.C. through an eponymous LLC.
Gallo v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALEXANDER GALLO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-01746 (TNM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the District of Columbia barred landlords from evicting tenants during
Gallo v. Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) BERNARD GALLO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 22-cv-01092 (APM)
District of Columbia v. Towerspublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 21-CV-34, 21-CV-35, 21-CV-36, & 21-CV-37 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) MARCO ANTONIO GALLO-RODRIGUEZ,) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1890 (RWR) ) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED ) STATES, et al., ) ) Defe
Spiller v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERRY SPILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-2059 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDOM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Perry Spiller and James McCray bring this action against the District of Columbia an
Gallo Kanon Thomas v. Charles Andersonpublic domain
Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 245 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-24-277 GALLO KANON THOMAS Opinion Delivered April 23, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.
Spiller v. Dist. of Columbiapublic domain
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Perry Spiller and James McCray bring this action against the District *243of Columbia and two Metropolitan Police Department Officers, who are identified in the complaint as Timothy Murphy and Robert Barillaro. Spiller and McCray allege that they were unlawfully arrested, injured, and de
Del Gallo v. Parentpublic domain
(2008) Rinaldo DEL GALLO, III, Plaintiff v. Roger PARENT, et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 06-30063-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF (Dkt. Nos. 31, 35, 38, and 39) PONSOR, District Judge.
Mills v. District of Columbia Department of Mental Health Saint Elizabeths Hospital Managerspublic domain
756 F.Supp.2d 55 (2010) Darius MILLS, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH SAINT ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL MANAGERS et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0648 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 21, 2010. *56 Darius Mills, Fort Washington, MD, pro se. Heather R. Skeeles
Mills v. District of Columbia Department of Mental Health Saint Elizabeths Hospital Managerspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Darius Mills, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-0648 (JDB) District of Columbia Department of Mental Health Saint Elizabeths Hospital Managers et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this action filed pro se, plaintiff alleges that he was deprived of due p
Gallo v. Second Taxing District of Norwalk Operating Under the Name of South Norwalk Electric & Waterpublic domain
507 F.Supp.2d 164 (2007) Donald GALLO, Plaintiff, v. The SECOND TAXING DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NORWALK OPERATING UNDER THE NAME OF SOUTH NORWALK ELECTRIC AND WATER, Defendant. No. 3:06CV242 (DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 28, 2007. *165 *166
Gallo v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BUSH, Judge. This case is before the court following briefing on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The issues presented in the motion are (1) whether the Court of Federal Claims may exercise jurisdiction over a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 8151(a) (2000), a section of the Federal Employees’ Compensatio
District of Columbia v. Sierra Clubpublic domain
670 A.2d 354 (1996) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellants, v. The SIERRA CLUB, Appellee. Nos. 95-CV-509, 95-CV-676 & 95-CV-677. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 20, 1995. Decided January 19, 1996. *356 Donna M. Murasky, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Garland Pinkston, Jr.,
Gallo v. Department of Labor and Industriespublic domain
120 P.3d 564 (2005) 155 Wash.2d 470 Paula K. GALLO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent, Kenneth Barber, Fred Jones, and Daniel Renshaw, Appellants, v. Department of Labor and Industries, Respondent, and James A. Dumont, Appellant, v. Supervalu, Inc., and Department of Labor and Industries, Respondents. Nos. 74849-7, 75064-5, 75070-0, 75071-8, 75088-2.
Gallo v. Department of Labor & Industriespublic domain
81 P.3d 869 (2003) 119 Wash.App. 49 Paula K. GALLO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES, Respondent. No. 21574-1-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight. November 4, 2003. *870 Robert C. Milhem, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant. John R. Wasberg, Assista