Cases

594 S.E.2d 232 (2004) Cynthia Bobbitt GARRETT, Plaintiff v. Betty J. SMITH Guardian ad Litem for Sarah Lynn Smith, Defendant. No. COA03-719. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 20, 2004. E. Gregory Stott, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant. Yates, McLamb & Weyer, L.L.P., by John T. Honeycutt, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, P. J., PIPKIN and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 2

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Garrett Smith pleaded guilty to a charge that he possessed with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the district court ordered him to serve a prison term of 168 months. Despite having expressly waived his right to appeal the sentence in his written plea agreement, Smith nonetheless has appealed,

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Apr 13 2020, 10:14 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, April 12, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0157. GARRETT SMITH et al. v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA EX REL. JOSEPH K. MULHOLLAND. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00342-CV ________________ W. EARL TOUCHSTONE AND LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, Appellants V. GARRETT GAGLIANO, App

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge Appellant John C. Garrett, as heir and nominated personal representative of Nancy Lee Garrett's estate, appeals from the Sebastian County Circuit Court's order that granted summary judgment to appellee George Webb Neece and denied summary *688judgment to Nancy Lee Garrett.1 In its order, the tr

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order of voluntary dismissal of the claim against Darita Washington (Washington) without prejudice, which followed its order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) in this no-fault action. Because we are bound under MCR 7.215(J)(1) to follow this Court’s

SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MILLER, P. J., and PIPKIN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules Febru

Affirmed and Opinion filed October 31, 2002 Affirmed and Opinion filed October 31, 2002. In The

OPINION OF THE COURT Abdus-Salaam, J. Defendant Mark Garrett was convicted after trial of two counts of murder in the second degree for killing a 13-year-old girl. The evidence against defendant included his confession, which he maintained was false and had been coerced by police. In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the People committed a constitutional violation (see Brady v Maryland,

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: This case involves a dispute between Keith Redburn and the City of Victoria, Texas, over the City's use of Redburn's residential property to drain and filter storm-sewer runoff from a large part of the City. It is undisputed that the drainage from the City's system has created a deep chasm across Redburn's property that detracts from its value and utility

OPINION KIRK, Judge. Appellant Mpatanishi Syanaloli Tayari-Garrett, an attorney, proceeded pro se *647during her jury trial on a charge of criminal contempt for failing to appear for trial. Although appellant invoked her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, she effectively waived this privilege when she persistently testified while

702 S.E.2d 470 (2010) GARRETT v. The STATE. No. A10A1294. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 13, 2010. *471 Brandon A. Bullard, Ashley F. Campbell, for appellant. Fred A. Lane, Jr., Dist. Atty., Thomas D. Lyles, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. ADAMS, Judge. Gary Stephen Garrett appeals the trial court's de

703 S.E.2d 666 (2010) GARRETT v. The STATE. No. A10A1074. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 13, 2010. *667 Jason W. Swindle, Drummond & Swindle, Carrolton, for appellant. Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Natalee L. Staats, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. ADAMS, Judge. Willie Frank Garr

702 S.E.2d 875 (2010) GARRETT v. The STATE. No. S10A1552. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 22, 2010. *876 James Denny Lamb, Columbus, for appellant. James D. Lamb, Waycross, for appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Thomas C. Earnest, District Attorney, Megan A. Lane, Assistant District Attorney, Paula K

248 P.3d 965 (2011) 350 Or. 1 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael GARRETT, Defendant-Respondent. (CC081235272; SC S058620). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted January 14, 2011. Decided March 10, 2011. *966 Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, Sale

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner James Garrett appeals pro se from a district court judgment in favor of defendant Ricci, following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Ricci violated his Eighth Amendment rights by assigning him to an upper bunk against the advice of medical staff. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. The district court did

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner James Garrett appeals pro se from a district court judgment in favor of defendant Ricci, following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Ricci violated his Eighth Amendment rights by assigning him to an upper bunk against the advice of medical staff. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. The district court did