Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GARY v. United States”
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
989 A.2d 711 (2010) GARY v. U.S. No. 08-CM-1367. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. February 2, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
955 A.2d 152 (2008) Lloyd GARY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 07-CM-717. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 12, 2008. Decided August 7, 2008. *153 Judith A. Lovelace, Suitland, MD, for appellant. James Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Jeffrey A. Taylor, United
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s supplemental motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Howard V. Gary and M Securities Investment, Inc., d/b/a Howard Gary & Company (“M Securities”), filed a complaint in this court on May 21, 2003, seeking $5 million in damages based upon th
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Raymond J. Gary appeals pro se from the denial of his 28 U.S.S. § 2255 petition as untimely given the one-year time limit imposed by the Aititerrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”). Passing the question whether the time limits of amended § 2255 are subject to equitable tolling, we a
United States v. Gary Matthewspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1668 & 24-1677 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY E. MATTHEWS and MONTE J. BRANNAN, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Cour
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States v. Gary Tinsleypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1417 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S
United States v. Gary Harrispublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2039 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Gary Levell Harris
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Gary Tinsleypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1417 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
510 U.S. 895 Garyv.United States. No. 93-5469. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 1993. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 F. 2d 474