Cases

437 F.Supp.2d 57 (2006) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, and Advanced Cell Technology, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ROSLIN INSTITUTE, Geron Corporation, and Exeter Life Sciences, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 05-353, 05-706. Document Nos. 16, 17. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 20, 2006. *58 Charles L. Gholz, F

Andersen, J.— Facts of Case The jury unanimously agreed that the defendant, Jerome Larnedo Henderson, was guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree as charged by the King County Prosecuting Attorney. The evidence against him was substantial. An independent eyewitness saw the defendant trying to break into a neighbor's house. Seattle *868

STEWART, J. | plaintiffs, Guindolyn and Dale Hopper (“the Hoppers”), sued the defendant, Ven-ator Contracting Group, L.L.C. (“Venator”), under the thedry of vicarious liability for damages stemming from an automobile accident. The Hoppers alleged that Wayne Austin (“Austin”) was a Venator employee in the course and scope of his employment when he caused the accident that injured Mrs. Hopper. The trial court granted a summary j

Case: 24-10724 Document: 84-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 19, 2025

CARTER, Judge. This is an appeal from a trial court judgment granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. FACTS On August 6, 1985, John Darjean, Jr., an employee of John’s Body Shop, was delivering an automobile owned by Ceferino Costello to his father’s repair shop when he struck an automobile owned by Barry Or-geron and driven by Rachelle Orgeron. At the time of the accident, t

204 Ga. App. 130 (1992) 418 S.E.2d 459 PARSONS v. CHATHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. A92A0171. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided May 1, 1992. Karsman, Brooks & Callaway, Charles C. Brooks, for appellant. Emily E. Garrard, George H. Chamlee, for appellee. BIRDSONG, Presiding Judge. Appellant, Willi

440 B.R. 243 (2010) In re BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Debtor. Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Plaintiff, v. J. Ezra Merkin, Gabriel Capital, L.P., Ariel Fund Ltd., Ascot Partners, L.P., Gabriel Capital Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-01789 (BRL). Adversary No. 09-1182 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION What’s in a name? To Andrea Loguidice and Brandon Snooks, the owners of Wandering Dago Inc. who wish to operate their food truck at the Empire State Plaza and the Saratoga Race Course, everything is in the name. On August 27, 2013, Plaintiff commenced this civil rights action seeking injunctive and declara

506 F.Supp.2d 969 (2007) Linda LAUBE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard F. ALLEN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:02cv957-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. August 31, 2007. *970 *971 *972 *

445 B.R. 206 (2011) In re BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Debtor. Irving H. Picard, as Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Plaintiff, v. Estate of Stanley Chais, et al.,[1] Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-01789 (BRL). Adversary No. 09-1172 (BRL). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. February 24, 2011.</

This case was submitted on briefs without oral argument. At time of submission it was assigned to another Justice. It was assigned to the writer of this opinion on February 8, 1960. The original bill was filed in the Chilton County Law and Equity Court, in Equity, on January 30, 1951, by J. Matt Johnson against J. A. Blalock and wife, Tellia Blalock, for the purpose of having the court define a boundary line between coterminous owners. §§ 2-4, Title 47, Code 1940; § 129, subdiv

From the foregoing statement of facts taken from the record, it is clear that in each instance money was advanced by the claimant to the defendant; the defendant gave his note payable to the claimant for the amount advanced, containing a clause usual in notes where collaterals are pledged, referring to and describing the assignment in question, which was in each instance attached to the note when it was executed and delivered. In other words, each loan constituted a separate and distinct tran

Paragraph 2 of the bill is as follows: "2. That complainant is the owner of the following described real estate situated in Chilton County, Alabama, to-wit: "Begin at a point 1069 feet East of the Northwest corner of NE1/4 of SW1/4, Section 13, Township 23, Range 15 East, thence run East 251 feet to the Northeast corner of said quarter section, thence South 3 degrees 30 minutes East for 231 feet to the shore line of Lay Dam Lake, thence South 20 degrees 30 minutes West along the

ACCEPTED 06-15-00013-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/16/2015 4:49:55 PM

322 F.Supp. 798 (1971) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Nathan WOLFSON, William F. Emmons et al., Defendants. Crim. A. No. 1909. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 3, 1971. *799 *800 *801 *802

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM