Cases

2021 UT 49 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STUART WOOD and LAURIE WOOD, Petitioners, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Respondent. No. 20200052 Heard May 3, 2021 Filed August 19, 2021 On Certio

713 S.E.2d 126 (2011) Mary GRAY, Plaintiff, widow of David D. Gray, Deceased Employee, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, INC., Employer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier. No. COA10-754. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 21, 2011. *127 Teague Rotenstreich Stanaland Fox & Holt, PLLC, Greensboro, by Paul A. Daniels

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. Concluding that the complaints of a trucking company employee to the company about the condition of its trucks may constitute protected conduct under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, the Court denies the employer’s motion for summary judgment. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS A. Procedural Backgrou

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE NINA SPLAHIN, Appellant. : Case No. Kl7A-lZ-OOl NEP In and for Kent County v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC, ET AL. Appellee. Q_R_D_B Submitted: March 12, 2018 Decided: May 9, 2018 Upon Consideration of Appellant’s Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas AFFIRMED Plaintiff-BeloW/Appellant Nina Shahin (hereinafcer “Appellant”), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas (hereinafter the “CCP”). In that order, the CCP granted Defendant JKMR, Inc. ’s (h

377 Pa. Superior Ct. 366 (1988) 547 A.2d 411 Rosemarie A. FRENCH and Melvin H. French, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, and A & D Glass Service, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company and Rixson. Appeal of UNITED PARCEL SERVICE. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 28, 1988. Filed September 9, 1988. *367 Mark

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE MICHAEL PICKENS, ) Docket No.: 2015-03-0100 Employee, ) ) v. ) State File Number: 95792-2014 ) UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,

WILLIAMS, J. | Claimant, James Dow, appeals the workers’ compensation judge’s decision, finding that claimant failed to meet his burden of proving that his disabling condition was the result of his work-related injury. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS Claimant, James Dow, was employed by United Parcel Service (“UPS”) for over 33 years; he was planning to retire effective May 29,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GLASSER, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff has objected, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. (Dkt. No. 26) (the “R & R”), dated October 25, 2013, recommending that the Court deny plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court

*246OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph J. Maltese, J. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs complaint is granted. Facts In this action by Debra Jo Huertas to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a trip and fall over stacked boxes, the defendant United Parcel Ser

FILED October 10, 2016 TN COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

BRYANT, Judge. *16Where competent evidence supports the findings of fact and where the findings of fact justify the conclusions of law, we affirm the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission, denying benefits to plaintiff under the Workers’ Compensation Act. Facts and Procedural History On 29 November 2001, David D. Gra

FILED December 3, 2015 TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

PERRY, J. This case is before the Court for review of the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 129 So.3d 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), which the district court certified as being in direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Braid Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. R & L Carrier

Opinion GRIMES, J. Plaintiff and appellant David Taylor (Taylor) brought an action against his employer, defendant and respondent United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), seeking recovery of unpaid overtime compensation, penalties for missed meal and rest periods, and other related claims.1 UPS successfully moved for summary judgment on the grounds Taylor was an exempt executive and admi

[Cite as In re Disinterment of Glass, 2023-Ohio-3509.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF : THE DISINTERMENT OF : MARION J. GLASS, DECEASED : C.A. Nos. 29700; 29707 IRENE J. GLASS, DECEASED :

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Amber Ibarra brought a Title VII sex discrimination claim against her former employer. The district court granted summary judgment for Ibarra’s employer on the ground that the grievance procedure established in a collective bargaining agreement provided the exclusive remedy for Ibarra’s Title VII claim. We vacate the district court’s judgm

[Cite as Albert v. United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc., 2016-Ohio-1541.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103163 HALLIE ALBERT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

581 F.3d 516 (2009) Daniel L. FREDRICKSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-2060. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 18, 2009. Decided September 8, 2009. *518 Steven H. Jesser (argued), Northfield, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Elle

1,BROWN, C.J. Finding error in the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants in this worker’s compensation case, we reverse and remand. Facts On August 15, 2001, Frank Haynes (“Haynes”) sustained a work-related injury to his neck and back when several boxes fell on him while he was unloading a truck. Haynes began receiving weekly indemnity benefits from Liberty Mu

474 F.Supp.2d 882 (2007) Darwin MOORE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-CV-12223-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 18, 2007. *883 Scott K. Ellis, Helveston & Helveston, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. Bonnie L. Mayfield, Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield