⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “GOMEZ v. COOK GROUP, INC.”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-01-16 · Published · cited 6× · 127 F.4th 750
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UGOCHUKWU GOODLUCK Nos. 21-36024 NWAUZOR; FERNANDO 22-35026 AGUIRRE-URBINA, individually and on behalf of all those similarly D.C. No. situated, 3:17-cv-05769- RJB Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION THE GEO GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021-11-12 · Published · cited 5× · 455 Ill. Dec. 669; 192 N.E.3d 86; 2021 IL App (1st) 191850
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015-01-12 · Published · cited 5× · 2013 IL App (1st) 130568
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Gomez v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 130568 Appellate Court CARLOS GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., Caption JAMES McHUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and PERI FORMWORK SYSTEM, INC., Defendants (Bovis Lend Lease, Inc., and James McHugh Construc
Brito v. Gomezpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 8105
Brito v Gomez (2018 NY Slip Op 08105) Brito v Gomez 2018 NY Slip Op 08105 Decided on November 27, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Singh, J., J. Published by New York State
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009-04-01 · Published · cited 3× · 608 F. Supp. 2d 724; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28806; 2009 WL 886226
608 F.Supp.2d 724 (2009) Robert & Donna JOWERS, Plaintiffs, v. BOC GROUP, INC., Esab Group, Inc., and Lincoln Electric Co., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-CV-0036. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. April 1, 2009. *728 Scott O. Nelson, Maples & Lomax, PA, Pascagoula, MS, Christopher T. Robertson
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 33× · 170 F. Supp. 3d 1063; 2016 WL 1059681; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34603
ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Facilitate Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Doc. 31).1 Defendant Wood Group Mustang, Inc. CWGM” or “Defendant”), responded to the Motion to Certify (Doc. 40), and Plaintiff replied in support (Doc. 41). Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Equitable Tolling (Doc. 48). Defendant respond
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018-08-29 · Published · cited 12× · 323 F. Supp. 3d 1368
MARCIA G. COOKE, United States District Judge In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disability Act to protect people with disabilities from discrimination in places of public accommodation. Since then, a bevy of administrative orders and court decisions have helped businesses understand how to apply the ADA to their brick-and-mortar stores. But as more and more people take their shopping online, regulations have fallen further
Gomez v. Gomezpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005-07-08 · Published · cited 6× · 168 S.W.3d 51; 2005 Ky. App. LEXIS 153; 2005 WL 1593377
168 S.W.3d 51 (2005) Cheryl GOMEZ; Catesby Woodford, Individually; Miller, Griffin & Marks, PSC, Appellants, v. Eduardo Roman GOMEZ, Appellee. No. 2004-CA-000432-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. July 8, 2005. *52 Thomas W. Miller, Catesby Woodford, Susan Y.W. Chun, Lexington, KY, for Appellant, Cheryl Gomez. Melinda G
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2013-10-22 · Published · cited 8× · 414 S.W.3d 911; 36 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1781; 2013 WL 5727548; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 13104
OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. Appellant, Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. (“Sentinel”), sued appellees, Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W. Olson, and Carey Roberts, for damages arising out of Olson’s alleged breach of a covenant not to compete in his employment agreement with Sentinel and Mistras’s alleged tor-tious interference with the employment agreeme
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-08-30 · Published · cited 2× · 318 F.R.D. 64; 2016 WL 4530321; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116191
Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge In this putative class action, Joseph Bemal alleges that NRA Group, LLC attempted to collect delinquent consumer debts by sending him and members of the putative class a form collection letter that violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., by purporting to assess a percentage-based
Gomez v. Lozanopublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012-03-13 · Published · cited 12× · 839 F. Supp. 2d 1309; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51639; 2012 WL 899694
Order on Motions for Summary Judgment ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge. For the following reasons, Raymond Chambers’s motion for summary judgment [D.E. 185] is granted, and the motions for summary judgment filed by the City of Miami Beach [D.E. 187] and Julio Blanco and Andy Lozano [D.E. 184] are Granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VI
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2011-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-09-00516-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG MOHICAN OIL & GAS, LLC, Appellant, v. SCORPION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC. AND CHAPCO, INC., Appellees. On appeal from the 319th
Gomez v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-02-10 · Published · cited 14× · 695 F. Supp. 2d 1049; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11569; 2010 WL 546337
695 F.Supp.2d 1049 (2010) Luis M. GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Case No. CV 08-05115 AJW. United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. February 10, 2010. *1051 Joel D. Leidner, Leidner & Leidner, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.
Texas Supreme Court · 2004-09-17 · Published · cited 145× · 146 S.W.3d 170; 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1214; 2004 Tex. LEXIS 894; 2004 WL 2090592
Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice OWEN, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice SMITH, Justice WAINWRIGHT, and Justice BRISTER joined. Generally, a product supplier must warn expected users of foreseeable risks that make the product unreasonably dangerous,1 but a supplier need not warn of risks that are common knowledge,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-09-21 · Published · cited 52× · 872 F.3d 1094
ORDER These matters are before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc filed by appellants Alkon, Frank, Holyoak, Martin, and Schulman in number 15-3228. Upon consideration, the panel grants in part, and only to the extent of the modifications contained in the attached revised Opinion, that part of the request seeking panel rehearing. The Opinion filed on August 23, 2017, is hereby withdrawn, and s
District Court, Virgin Islands · 2007-06-22 · Published · cited 2× · 48 V.I. 941; 2007 WL 1959166; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47912
GOMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 22, 2007) Before the Court is the motion of defendant CPP, Inc., d/b/a Cook Composites Polymers (“CPP”) to dismiss the complaint of Unlimited Holdings, Inc. (“Unlimited”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. *943I. FACTS Unlimited is a Virgi
District Court, E.D. New York · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 22× · 243 F. Supp. 3d 332; 2017 WL 1064682; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59412
MEMORANDÜM AND ORDER POLLAK, United States Magistrate Judge: On November 16, 2015, plaintiff Darlene Cook commenced this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988,.against defendant City of New York (“City”), New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) Officer Arturo Gomez, and NYPD Officers John and Jane Doe 1-3, alleging false arrest and failure to intervene, in violation of her constitutional rights
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001-05-02 · Published · cited 2× · 146 F. Supp. 2d 1334; 2001 WL 617529; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23091
146 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2001) ACCESS NOW, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER GROUP, LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 99109CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. May 2, 2001. *1335 Miguel Manuel De La O, David Everett Marko, De La O & Marko, Miami, FL, for plaintiffs. Ronald M. Rosengarden, Jennif
State v. Gomezpublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005-05-18 · Published · cited 274× · 163 S.W.3d 632; 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 473; 2005 WL 856848
OPINION FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined. E. RILEY ANDERSON, J., filed a concurring and dissenting opinion, in which ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., joined. We granted this appeal to determine whether the defendants are entitled to relief on their claim that admission of testi
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-03-21 · Published · cited 2× · 934 F. Supp. 2d 987; 2013 WL 1182847; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40674
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN Z. LEE, District Judge. Plaintiff Daveri Development Group, LLC (“Daveri”) submitted an application to the Defendant Village of Wheeling (“Wheeling”) to obtain zoning approval for an apartment building for individuals with mental disabilities who are capable of living independently. Wheeling denied the application citing zoning concerns. As a result of the den