Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GPS Industries, LLC v. Lewis”
GPS INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Lewispublic domain
691 F.Supp.2d 1327 (2010) GPS INDUSTRIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Brian K. LEWIS, Defendant. Case No. 8:09-CV-2507-T-17MAP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 1, 2010. *1329 Elizabeth Dianne Moneymaker, Dickinson & Gibbons, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Plaintiff. Henry Alzate, Robert J. Ducomb, Jr.,
Roblor Marketing Group, Inc. v. GPS Industries, Inc.public domain
633 F.Supp.2d 1341 (2008) ROBLOR MARKETING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. GPS INDUSTRIES, INC., Proshot Investors, LLC, Prolink Holding Corporation, Prolink Solutions, LLC, Intelligolf, Inc., Karrier Communications, L1 Technologies, Inc., Links Point, Inc., Skyhawke Technologies, LLC, uPlay, LLC, Goodwin Golf Group LLC, and Polaris Golf Systems, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 08-21496-CIV. United States Distri
Roblor Marketing Group, Inc. v. GPS Industries, Inc.public domain
645 F.Supp.2d 1130 (2009) ROBLOR MARKETING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. GPS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-21496-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. July 6, 2009. *1134 Alejandro Alvarez, Piedra & Associates, P.A., Coral Gables, FL, Brian Douglas Hancock, Douglas Lee Bridges, W. L
Moore v. GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLCpublic domain
WILLIAM H. STEELE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1296This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. (Docs. 50, 51). The parties have submitted briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 50-52, 54-55, 58-59), and the
Harbinger Capital Partners LLC v. Deere & Co.public domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants (collectively “Harbinger”) appeal from a judgment entered on February 10, 2015, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Berman, J.), dismissing Harbinger’s third amended complaint (the “Complaint”). Harbinger asserted securities fraud and related claims under federal and state law. The district court explained its reasoning in a memorandum and o
PYLE, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Bayview Loan Servicing LLC (“Bayview”) appeals the trial court’s order entering judgment in favor of Golden Foods, Inc., (“Golden Foods”) and Lewis Coulter (“Coulter”) on Bayview’s mortgage foreclosure claim and Golden Food’s conversion counterclaim. Bayview argues that there is insufficient evidence that it inte
Dan Huber, Mary Huber and Lads Network Solutions, Inc. v. Disaster Solutions, LLC and Scott Lewispublic domain
CONNER, J. The appellants, Dan Huber, Mary Huber, and LADS Network Solutions, Inc. (“LADS”), appeal two trial court orders finding them in civil contempt of court for violating court orders and an agreed injunction requiring the appellants not to disclose confidential information to third parties. The contempt orders impose two monetary sanctions, one compensatory, the other-
Crom, LLC v. Preload, LLCpublic domain
M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1193Plaintiff Crom, LLC ("Crom") filed this suit against its former employee, Phuong Bacon ("Bacon"), to enforce a Non-Compete Agreement and for damages caused by Bacon's alleged breach of the Agreement and breach of her common law duty of loyalty (Counts I and II).1
Paul Witmer v. Armistice Capital, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL WITMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0807-MTZ ) ARMISTICE CAPITAL, LLC, ) ARMISTICE CAPITAL MASTER FUND ) LTD., STEVEN BOYD, JOSHUA ) DISBROW, GARY CANTRELL, JOHN ) DONOFRIO, JR., CARL DOCKERY,
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-016-CV SHIOLENO INDUSTRIES, INC. APPELLANTS AND APPELLEES
</
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VANTAGE COMMODITIES FINANCIAL SERVICES I, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-01451 (TNM) v. WILLIS LIMITED, 1 et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this sprawling insurance coverage dispu
Metro Storage International LLC v. Harronpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE METRO STORAGE INTERNATIONAL ) LLC, METRO STORAGE LATAM LLC, ) MSI MANAGER LLC, LATAM ) MANAGER LLC, MATTHEW M. NAGEL, ) AS TRUSTEE OF THE MATTHEW M. ) NAGEL REVOCABLE TRUST DATED ) JULY 27, 2001, AS AMENDED, and K. ) BLAIR NAGEL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE K. ) BLAIR NAGEL REVOCABLE TRUST
Everphone, Inc. v. Go Technology Management, LLCpublic domain
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL R. WALLACE LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER JUDGE 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 10400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.public domain
7/8/2021 10:09:43 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-956.pdf 18-956_new.pdf versus 62 pages (323 KB) 62 pages (308 KB)
Cancan Development, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CANCAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ) ROBERT A. GRANIERI, ROBERT J. ) GRANIERI and GEORGE TOTH, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 6429-VCL ) SANDRA MANNO and MANNO ) ENTERPRISES, LLC,
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.public domain
5/3/2021 12:16:35 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-956.pdf 18-956_new.pdf versus 62 pages (323 KB) 62 pages (321 KB)
Todd Moscowitz v. Theory Entertainment LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TODD MOSCOWITZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0780-MTZ ) THEORY ENTERTAINMENT LLC, ) ) Defendant. )
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.public domain
4/6/2021 10:15:22 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-956.pdf 18-956_new.pdf versus 62 pages (323 KB) 62 pages (322 KB)
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit