Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) JENNIFER GRAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 09-1310 (EGS) ) UNITED STATES ARMY CRIMINAL ) INVESTIGATION COMMAND, et al. ) ) D

742 F.Supp.2d 68 (2010) Jennifer GRAY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND, et al., Defendants. Civ. Action No. 09-1310 (EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 30, 2010. *70 Mark S. Zaid, Bradley P. Moss, Mark S. Zaid, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Kathryn Ann

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS PENLAND, Judge: Ronald Gray (Petitioner) is confined and awaiting imposition of a death sentence adjudged by a general court-martial on 12 April 1988, approved.by the convening authority on 29 July 1988, affirmed by this court and

WOOD, Chief Judge. Meddling with Mother Nature is not always a good idea, as the ongoing saga of the Asian carp illustrates. The unfortunate confluence of two interventions — the linkage of the Mississippi River system to the Great Lakes and the effort to control weeds in southern aquatic farms by importing Asian carp, a voracious non-native fish — has led to a situation in which

U.S. v. Gray United States, Appellee v. Ronald A. GRAY, Specialist Four U.S. Army, Appellant No. 93-7001 CMR No. 8800807 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued March 7, 1995 Reargued December 17, 1996 Decided May 28, 1999 SULLIVAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which CRAWFORD and GIERKE, JJ., joined. EFFRON, J., filed a dissenting op

Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of committing sodomy and adultery with the wife of a subordinate, Sergeant M, and committing indecent acts with Sergeant M’s 9-year-old daughter, K, in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 925 and 934, respectively. A

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alex J. SECORD, Staff Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 24-0217 Crim. App. No. 20210667 Argued January 28, 2025—Decided July 30, 2025 Military Judges: G. Brett Batdorff (arra

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge These five consolidated cases pertain to Freedom of Information Act requests by assorted media and non-profit organizations, mainly seeking any memoranda prepared by former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey about his conversations with President Donald Trump. On February 2, 2018, this Court granted a partial Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Defendants FBI and

OPINION OF THE COURT GRAVELLE, Judge: Pursuant to mixed pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of absence without leave, wrongful use of cocaine, and forgery, in violation of Articles 86, 112a, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 912a, and 923 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of

Judgment rendered January 13, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 53,609-KA No. 53,610-KA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT

OPINION OF THE COURT ON SUPPLEMENTAL ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR NAUGHTON, Senior Judge: The court denied a petition for a new trial and affirmed the findings and sentence in this death-penalty case on 15 December 1992.1 United States v. Gray, 37 M.J. 730 (A.C.M.R.1992). That same date, the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of our decision denying the appellant’s motion to

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nidal M. HASAN, Major United States Army, Appellant No. 21-0193 Crim. App. No. 20130781 Argued March 28, 2023—Decided March 4, 2024 Military Judges: Gregory A. G

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL NAUGHTON, Senior Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, contrary to his pleas, of attempted murder, premeditated murder (two specifications), rape (three specifications), larceny, robbery (two specifications), forcible sodomy (two specifications), and burglary,

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nidal M. HASAN, Major United States Army, Appellant No. 21-0193 Crim. App. No. 20130781 Argued March 28, 2023—March 4, 2024 Military Judges: Gregory A. Gros

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nidal M. HASAN, Major United States Army, Appellant No. 21-0193 Crim. App. No. 20130781 Argued March 28, 2023—September 6, 2023 Military Judges: Gregory A. Gr

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Nidal M. HASAN, Major United States Army, Appellant No. 21-0193 Crim. App. No. 20130781 Argued March 28, 2023—September 6, 2023 Military Judges: Gregory A. Gr

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50204 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:14-cr-00192- v. CJC-1 JOHN ARTHUR WALTHALL, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0213p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Ethan W. TUCKER Seaman (E-3), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMG 0380 Docket No. 1472 7

Case: 20-1248 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 08/26/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ELLEN P. BULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2020-1248 ______________________ Appeal from the Unit