Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GREGORY N NASH and ELIZABETH ANN NASH”
FILED April 5, 2023 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
713 F.Supp.2d 734 (2010) PENNSYLVANIA CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, New York Chiropractic Council, Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, Florida Chiropractic Association and California Chiropractic Association, on their own behalf and in a representational capacity on behalf of their members, and Gregory T. Kuhlman, D.C., Jay Korsen, D.C., Ian Barlow, Kendall Gearhart, D.C., Jeffrey P. Leri, D.C., Michelle M. Askar, D.C., Mark Barnard, D.C., Barry A. Wahn
Robert Edward Reed v. Jance Ann Reed Collinspublic domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Robert Edward Reed, individually and as the Executor of Racheal Ann Reed, deceased, FILED Plaintiff Below, Petitioner November 21, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 18-0009 (Kanawha County 17-
Justin Scott Peck v. Gregory Scolapiopublic domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Justin Scott Peck, Defendant Below, Petitioner FILED vs.) No. 19-0165 (Monongalia County 17-C-413) May 26, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
Beroth Oil Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Gregory v. Dillard's, Inc.public domain
565 F.3d 464 (2009) Crystal GREGORY; Alberta Turner; Carla Turner; Treva Gage; Debra Hamilton; Capria Lee; Antwinette Avery; Jeff McKinney; Arnel Monroe; Michael Richmond; Maren Snell; Felicia Turner; Michael Warrick; LaShanda Wisham; Cecilia Young, Appellants, v. DILLARD'S, INC., Appellee. No. 05-3910. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 16, 2008.<
Opinion issued December 31, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00418-CV ——————————— GREGORY SULLO AND BRIAN ZIMMERMAN, Appellants V. FELIX MICHAEL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBOSH BAIL BONDING, PAUL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBO
Opinion issued November 19, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00418-CV ——————————— GREGORY SULLO AND BRIAN ZIMMERMAN, Appellants V. FELIX MICHAEL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBOSH BAIL BONDING, PAUL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBOSH
Crystal Gregory v. Dillard'spublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3910 ___________ Crystal Gregory; Alberta Turner; Carla * Turner; Treva Gage; Debra Hamilton; * Capria Lee; Antwinette Avery; Jeff * McKinney; Arnel Monroe; Michael * Appeal from the United States Richmond; Maren Snell; Felicia Turner; * District Court for the Michael Warrick
In re Outer Banks Ventures, Inc.public domain
ORDER ALLOWING AMENDED OBJECTION TO CLAIM AS TO CALCULATION AND REQUIRING FILING OF AMENDED PROOF OF CLAIM Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matters before the court in this chapter 11 case are the remaining aspects of the debtor’s amended objection to the claim of J. Jeffrey Tinkham Family Trust (“the Trust”). An order denying the objection to the extent that it asserted the No
OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice In this mandamus proceeding, relators, Kubosh Bail Bonding, Kubosh Law Office, Paul Kubosh, and Felix Michael Kubosh (collectively, “the Kuboshes”), ask this Court to vacate the trial court’s order refusing to require real parties in interest (“the Plaintiffs”) to produce unredacted copies of twelve emails (“the Emails”) excha
Abrons Family Practice & Urgent Care v. N.C. Dep’t Health & Human Servs., 2015 NCBC 60. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 14 CVS 635 ABRONS FAMILY PRACTICE AND ) URGENT CARE, PA; NASH OB-GYN ) ASSOCIATES, PA; HIGHLAND ) OBSTETRICAL-GYNECOLOGICAL CLINIC,
Sangamo Weston, Inc. v. National Surety Corp.public domain
307 S.C. 143 (1992) 414 S.E.2d 127 SANGAMO WESTON, INC., Plaintiff v. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, American Insurance Corporation, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Globe Indemnity Company, Certain Lloyd's Underwriters and Companies, American Motorists Insurance Company, Puritan Insurance Company, Prudential Reinsurance Company, and United States Fire Insurance Company, Defendants.
At Massey Coal Co., Inc. v. Barnhartpublic domain
381 F.Supp.2d 469 (2005) A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. RDB 03-3389. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 11, 2005. *470 John Ray Woodrum, Margaret Summers Lopez, William Gregory Mott, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoa
Ministerio Roca Solida v. United Statespublic domain
TARANTO, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree that we should affirm the Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of Roca Soli-da’s Tucker Act case under 28 U.S.C. § 1500, based on the construction of that section’s language in United States v. Tohono O’Odham Nation, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1723, 179 L.Ed.2d 723 (2011). I join the court’s opinion. I do so, however, with the recognition that this application of
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Richards v. Duke Universitypublic domain
480 F.Supp.2d 222 (2007) Suzette RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-01179 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2007. *223 *224 *225 *226
Hoke County Board of Education v. Statepublic domain
*158 PER CURIAM. In Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) and Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 358 N.C. 605, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004), 2 this Court first found and then reaffirmed that
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Justice MOORE. We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Bursey v. South Carolina Dep’t of Health and Envtl. Control, 360 S.C. 135, 600 S.E.2d 80 (Ct.App.2004). We affirm. PROCEDURAL FACTS As part of the dam remediation project on Lake Murray, petitioner (SCE & G) planned a back-up dam to be constructed by using materials that could