⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “GREGORY N NASH and ELIZABETH ANN NASH”

West Virginia Supreme Court · 2023-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
FILED April 5, 2023 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-05-17 · Published · cited 1× · 713 F. Supp. 2d 734; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50723; 2010 WL 1979440
713 F.Supp.2d 734 (2010) PENNSYLVANIA CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, New York Chiropractic Council, Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, Florida Chiropractic Association and California Chiropractic Association, on their own behalf and in a representational capacity on behalf of their members, and Gregory T. Kuhlman, D.C., Jay Korsen, D.C., Ian Barlow, Kendall Gearhart, D.C., Jeffrey P. Leri, D.C., Michelle M. Askar, D.C., Mark Barnard, D.C., Barry A. Wahn
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Robert Edward Reed, individually and as the Executor of Racheal Ann Reed, deceased, FILED Plaintiff Below, Petitioner November 21, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 18-0009 (Kanawha County 17-
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Justin Scott Peck, Defendant Below, Petitioner FILED vs.) No. 19-0165 (Monongalia County 17-C-413) May 26, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 10× · 808 S.E.2d 488; 256 N.C. App. 401
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009-05-12 · Published · cited 218× · 565 F.3d 464; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10101; 2009 WL 1290742
565 F.3d 464 (2009) Crystal GREGORY; Alberta Turner; Carla Turner; Treva Gage; Debra Hamilton; Capria Lee; Antwinette Avery; Jeff McKinney; Arnel Monroe; Michael Richmond; Maren Snell; Felicia Turner; Michael Warrick; LaShanda Wisham; Cecilia Young, Appellants, v. DILLARD'S, INC., Appellee. No. 05-3910. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 16, 2008.<
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2020-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 31, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00418-CV ——————————— GREGORY SULLO AND BRIAN ZIMMERMAN, Appellants V. FELIX MICHAEL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBOSH BAIL BONDING, PAUL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBO
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued November 19, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00418-CV ——————————— GREGORY SULLO AND BRIAN ZIMMERMAN, Appellants V. FELIX MICHAEL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBOSH BAIL BONDING, PAUL KUBOSH A/K/A KUBOSH
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3910 ___________ Crystal Gregory; Alberta Turner; Carla * Turner; Treva Gage; Debra Hamilton; * Capria Lee; Antwinette Avery; Jeff * McKinney; Arnel Monroe; Michael * Appeal from the United States Richmond; Maren Snell; Felicia Turner; * District Court for the Michael Warrick
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017-09-19 · Published · cited 0× · 572 B.R. 604; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 3167
ORDER ALLOWING AMENDED OBJECTION TO CLAIM AS TO CALCULATION AND REQUIRING FILING OF AMENDED PROOF OF CLAIM Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matters before the court in this chapter 11 case are the remaining aspects of the debtor’s amended objection to the claim of J. Jeffrey Tinkham Family Trust (“the Trust”). An order denying the objection to the extent that it asserted the No
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-05-16 · Published · cited 4× · 522 S.W.3d 75; 2017 WL 2117543; 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 4446
OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice In this mandamus proceeding, relators, Kubosh Bail Bonding, Kubosh Law Office, Paul Kubosh, and Felix Michael Kubosh (collectively, “the Kuboshes”), ask this Court to vacate the trial court’s order refusing to require real parties in interest (“the Plaintiffs”) to produce unredacted copies of twelve emails (“the Emails”) excha
North Carolina Business Court · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 NCBC 60
Abrons Family Practice & Urgent Care v. N.C. Dep’t Health & Human Servs., 2015 NCBC 60. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 14 CVS 635 ABRONS FAMILY PRACTICE AND ) URGENT CARE, PA; NASH OB-GYN ) ASSOCIATES, PA; HIGHLAND ) OBSTETRICAL-GYNECOLOGICAL CLINIC,
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992-01-27 · Published · cited 19× · 414 S.E.2d 127; 307 S.C. 143; 1992 S.C. LEXIS 24
307 S.C. 143 (1992) 414 S.E.2d 127 SANGAMO WESTON, INC., Plaintiff v. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, American Insurance Corporation, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Globe Indemnity Company, Certain Lloyd's Underwriters and Companies, American Motorists Insurance Company, Puritan Insurance Company, Prudential Reinsurance Company, and United States Fire Insurance Company, Defendants.
District Court, D. Maryland · 2005-08-11 · Published · cited 1× · 381 F. Supp. 2d 469; 36 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2011; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16731; 2005 WL 1939232
381 F.Supp.2d 469 (2005) A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. RDB 03-3389. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 11, 2005. *470 John Ray Woodrum, Margaret Summers Lopez, William Gregory Mott, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoa
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-02-26 · Published · cited 16× · 778 F.3d 1351; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2829; 2015 WL 795293
TARANTO, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree that we should affirm the Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of Roca Soli-da’s Tucker Act case under 28 U.S.C. § 1500, based on the construction of that section’s language in United States v. Tohono O’Odham Nation, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1723, 179 L.Ed.2d 723 (2011). I join the court’s opinion. I do so, however, with the recognition that this application of
District Court, District of Columbia · 2007-03-30 · Published · cited 116× · 480 F. Supp. 2d 222; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22864; 2007 WL 942070
480 F.Supp.2d 222 (2007) Suzette RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-01179 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2007. *223 *224 *225 *226
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 367 N.C. 156; 749 S.E.2d 451; 2013 WL 5962871; 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1164; 298 Educ. L. Rep. 549
*158 PER CURIAM. In Leandro v. State, 346 N.C. 336, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) and Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 358 N.C. 605, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004), 2 this Court first found and then reaffirmed that
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 369 S.C. 176; 631 S.E.2d 899; 2006 S.C. LEXIS 217
Justice MOORE. We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Bursey v. South Carolina Dep’t of Health and Envtl. Control, 360 S.C. 135, 600 S.E.2d 80 (Ct.App.2004). We affirm. PROCEDURAL FACTS As part of the dam remediation project on Lake Murray, petitioner (SCE & G) planned a back-up dam to be constructed by using materials that could