Cases

NUMBER 13-13-00192-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ TED W. KARAM AND GREGORY SCOTT SMITH, Appellants, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2947 IN THE MATTER OF: GREGORY KLEYNERMAN, Debtor. APPEAL OF: SCOTT SMITH ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 22-CV-162-JPS — J.P. Stadtm

McDonald, J. For three centuries, Maryland law has provided that an action seeking payment of back rent for a residential lease is to be brought before the expiration of a three-year period of limitations. That period of limitations is currently reflected in Maryland Code, Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article ("CJ"), § 5-101. In recent decades, the question has arisen whether the

*343Opinion KENNARD, J. On October 9, 1991, defendant Gregory Scott Smith pled guilty to (1) first degree murder in violation of Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a);1 (2) kidnapping in violation of section 207, subdivision (a); (3) arson in violation of section 451, subdivisions (c) and (d); (4) commission of a forcible l

CARL E. SMITH and MARGARITA SMITH, ) ) Appellants, ) ) vs. ) No. SD32604 ) GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE ) FILED: June 3, 2014 COMPANY, GREGORY HERKERT, and ) THE STOLAR PARTNERSHIP, LLP, )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Madeline Hughes Haikala, United States District Judge Plaintiff James Scott alleges that defendant Sergeant Kyle Palmer violated his *1306rights under the Fourth Amendment and Alabama law when Sergeant Palmer arrested him in a church parking lot. (Doc. 1, pp. 7-9). Plaintiff Carolyn Scott also asserts a claim agains

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 554 (2005) 35 Cal.4th 334 107 P.3d 229 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gregory Scott SMITH, Defendant and Appellant. No. S026223. Supreme Court of California. March 10, 2005. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 27, 2005. Certiorari Denied October 31, 2005.

Opinion by Justice Molberg *698In this appeal, we address whether the trial court exceeded our mandate from a prior appeal and whether the evidence supported the appellate attorney's fees awarded by the trial court on remand. This case was tried, appealed, reversed and remanded in part, tried again on the issue of appellate attorney's fees, and is now be

Case: 11-50193 Document: 00511893048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 20, 2012 No. 11-50193 Lyle W. C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 20, 2001 Session GREGORY SCOTT CAUDILL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Post-Conviction Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cocke County No. 24975-I Ben W. Hooper, II, Judge No. E2000-00586-CCA-R3-CD July 19, 2001 A Cocke County gran

WILSON, Circuit Judge: Charles Edward Owens, a Georgia state prisoner sentenced to life in prison for malice murder, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. On appeal, Owens argues that (1) the state trial court’s instructions to the jury on venue, an essential element of the crime charged, improperly shifted the burden of proof from the state

OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Scott Nordstrom, a death row inmate in Arizona state prison, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims that the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) policy and practice for inspecting inmates’ outgoing legal mail violates his Sixth and First Amendment rights. We hold that ADC’s current “inspection” policy

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCOTT. I. BACKGROUND On June 1, 2009, Appellant, Michelle Smith, was indicted for Possession of Drug Paraphernalia (PDP), Second Offense. On September 10, 2009, Appellant pled guilty to the charge, and, pursuant to a plea agreement, she received a five-year pretrial diversion. At the time Appellant entered into the diversion, the penalty for Second Offense P

529 F.3d 818 (2008) Viola SCOTT, On Behalf of Absalom SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-1796. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 17, 2008. Filed: June 23, 2008. *819 Eugene Gregory Wallace, arg

OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Gregory Haynes (“Haynes”) was the counsel for the plaintiff in the underlying action. The district court determined that Haynes continued pursuit of plaintiffs claims, after it was clear that the claims were frivolous and in bad faith. The court also determined that the defendants had incurred excess costs and fees of ov

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered August 7, 1995, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s contentio

*1211 OPINION FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Gerard Smith, Maricela Long, Gregory Thompson, Mickey Manzo, Scott Craig, Stephen Leavins (collectively, the “Joint Appellants”), and James Sexton each appeal their convictions for obstruction of justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis A. Givens appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing Givens’ complaint in part and granting summary judgment in part. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

Filed 11/20/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S210898 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/1 D060317 VINCE BRYAN SMITH, ) ) Riverside County

Bailey, Judge. Case Summary [1] Upon the trial of a personal injury action brought by Gregory Smith ("Smith") against Nolan Clayton ("Clayton"), a jury found Clayton liable for $21,000,000.00, and the trial court subsequently awarded Smith a portion of the prejudgment interest he requested. Clayton moved for post-verdict credit for advance payments purportedly made