Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GUE Liquidation Companies, Inc.”
Pro-Edge L.P. v. Guepublic domain
419 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2006) PRO-EDGE L.P. d/b/a Trans Ova Genetics, Inc. and Trans Ova Genetics, L.C. f/k/a Trans Ova Genetics, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Charles S. GUE, III, DVM, Defendant. No. C05-4068-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 7, 2006. *1065 *1066 Charle
Naterra International, Inc. v. Bensalempublic domain
Case: 22-1872 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATERRA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant v. SAMAH BENSALEM, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1872 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent
Naterra International, Inc. v. Bensalempublic domain
Case: 22-1872 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/15/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NATERRA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant v. SAMAH BENSALEM, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1872 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent
Case: 24-1965 Document: 76 Page: 1 Filed: 01/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AMGEN USA, INC., BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC., CELLTRION, INC., FORMYCON AG, AMGEN INC., Defendants SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD., Defendant-A
MTD Prods. Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 23-34 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 21-00264 MTD PRODUCTS INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and BRIGGS & STRATTON, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court denies Plaintiff’s motio
MTD Prods. Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 23-34 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 21-00264 MTD PRODUCTS INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and BRIGGS & STRATTON, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court denies Plaintiff’s motio
Oscar Munoz v. Nucor Steel Kankakee, Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1287 OSCAR MUNOZ and MUNOZ SONS TRUCKING, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NUCOR STEEL KANKAKEE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States D
KR Enterprises, Inc. v. Zerteck Incpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2069 & 20-2155 KR ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. ZERTECK INC., doing business as BOAT-N-RV WAREHOUSE, et al., Defendants-Appellants,
Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.public domain
Case: 19-2054 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 04/22/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2019-2054, 2019-2081 _
OPINION AND ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO, Judge This case arises from an-insurance dispute. On November 29, 20.07, an explosion *762occurred at the Manchester, Georgia plant of G&S Metal Consultants, Inc. (GSMC), an aluminum processing and recycling business. At that time, GSMC had a commercial insurance policy issued by Continental Casualty Company (
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1524 CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MULLINS FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dist
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Hornpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 19-13285 Date Filed: 06/28/2022 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13285 ____________________ WREAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 19-13285 Date Filed: 06/28/2022 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13285 ____________________ WREAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant,
USCA11 Case: 22-13776 Document: 57-1 Date Filed: 04/04/2025 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13776 ____________________ ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDU
MidAmerica C2L Incorporated v. Siemens Energy, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 20-11266 Date Filed: 02/15/2022 Page: 1 of 47 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-11266 ____________________ MIDAMERICA C2L INCORPORATED, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-
Baouch v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Laurie Smith Camp, Chief United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on several motions. Defendants Werner Enterprises, Inc., and Drivers Management, LLC (collectively “Werner”) filed the following motions: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, ECF No. 303; Motion to De-certify the Class and Collective Action, ECF No. 314; Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 316; and t
TRC Operating Co. v. Chevron USA, Inc.public domain
Filed 6/21/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRC OPERATING COMPANY, INC., et al., F083724 Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. S1500-CV- v.
Julius H. Schoeps v. Sompo Holdings, Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-1405 JULIUS H. SCHOEPS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOMPO HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from th
Alston v. DIRECTV, Inc.public domain
ORDER AND OPINION J. Michelle Childs, United States District Court Judge Defendants DIRECTV, Inc., DIRECTV, LLC (together, “DirecTV”) and MasTec North America, Inc. (“MasTec”) (collectively, “Defendants”)1 have filed 14 motions seeking summary judgment on claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., asserted by Plaintiffs Jame