Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gabrielle Jean Tucker”
Borcea v. Carnival Corp.public domain
ORDER APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT COOKE, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Other Relief (DE 65). THE COURT considered the parties’ oral submissions on October 25, 2006, concerning the parties’ request that the Court approve the proposed class action settlement. Ear
Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Kenneth Salazarpublic domain
OPINION PARKER, Senior Circuit Judge: The Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus san-taanae) is a small freshwater fish native to several California rivers and streams, including the Santa Ana River. In 2000, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), after being sued by conservation groups, designated the sucker as a “threatened” speci
August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA
In re H.V.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 748 OPINION ON REHEARING Following the issuance of our original opinion, the State filed a motion for rehearing arguing that we erred in our analysis of the State's second issue by drawing a distinction between a custodial statement made voluntarily in the accidental absence of
United States v. Singhpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. A jury found defendant-appellant Par-amjit Singh guilty of (a) making a false statement to a government agency (in an application for a Social Security card), and (b) possessing a counterfeit immigration document. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001(a)(2), 1546(a). Singh appeals. We affirm. I. <
Fletcher v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1625 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 02/24/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WILLIAM FLETCHER, TARA DAMRON, RICHARD LONGSINGER, KATHRYN REDCORN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1625 ____________________
Fletcher v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1625 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 02/24/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WILLIAM FLETCHER, TARA DAMRON, RICHARD LONGSINGER, KATHRYN REDCORN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1625 ____________________
Corus Construction Venture, LLC v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp. (In Re Laketown Wharf Marketing, Corp.)public domain
433 B.R. 419 (2010) In re LAKETOWN WHARF MARKETING, CORPORATION, n/k/a Laketown Wharf Marketing, LLC, Debtor. Corus Construction Venture, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corporation, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-40692-LMK. Adversary No. 09-04009-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. July 19, 2010.
Dalmasso v. Dalmassopublic domain
269 Kan. 752 (2000) 9 P.3d 551 ELIZABETH GERALDINE DALMASSO, Appellant, v. JEAN-LUC DALMASSO, Appellee. No. 83,895. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 14, 2000. *753 Frank D. Taff, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Allan A. Hazlett, of Allan A. Ha
Donte Wordlaw v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00069-CR DONTE WORDLAW APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT CO
Milton v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1131 Document: 120 Page: 1 Filed: 06/02/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VIRGINIA MILTON AND ARNOLD MILTON, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STAT
Milton v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1131 Document: 120 Page: 1 Filed: 06/02/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VIRGINIA MILTON AND ARNOLD MILTON, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants TRAVELERS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STAT
Wentz v. Montana Power Co.public domain
JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from an order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, denying motions for change of venue filed by certain of the defendants. We affirm. *16FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On Nove
Corus Construction Venture, LLC v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp. (In re Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp.)public domain
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LEWIS M. KILLIAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on Co-rus Construction Venture, LLC’s (CCV) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which seeks a declaratory judgment that defendants Jonathan R. Adkins, et al. and defendants Peter Bell, et al. (collectively, the “Ori
United States v. Frank M. Howardpublic domain
Case: 12-15756 Date Filed: 02/19/2014 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15756 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-000
United States v. Frank M. Howardpublic domain
CARNES, Chief Judge: This Court has held that a conviction under Alabama’s third-degree burglary statute, Ala.Code § 13A-7-7, can qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). See United States v. Rainer, 616 F.3d 1212, 1213 (11th Cir.2010). The settled law of that decision has been unsettled by the Supreme C
People v. Davispublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Davis, 2012 IL App (4th) 110305 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption ANDRE DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-11-0305 Filed March 5, 2012 Held
People v. Davispublic domain
966 N.E.2d 570 (2012) 359 Ill. Dec. 249 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-11-0305. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, Fourth District. March 5, 2012. *572 Jane E. Raley (argued), Bluhm Legal Clinic, Northwestern University, School
People v. Bellpublic domain
2021 IL App (1st) 190366 THIRD DIVISION March 31, 2021 No. 1-19-0366 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRS
People v. Bellpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and i