Cases

PER CURIAM: Joyce Hargress appeals the district court's decision affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405 (g), 1383(c)(3). On November 6, 2017, this

PER CURIAM: Joyce Hargress appeals the district court’s decision affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). After careful review, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND FACTS In May 2013,

PER CURIAM: Cornelius Washington appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Mr. Washington primarily argues that the Appeals Council erred when it refused to consi

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: Sonya Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for remand and affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision to deny her application for disability insurance benefits. Hunter contends that the district court should have remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedin

PER CURIAM: Leticia Medina appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social .Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. She challenges the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) on several grounds. First, she contends that the ALJ erred in failing to find that all of her impairments were severe. Second, she argues that the ALJ did not adequately explain why he gave lit

496 F.3d 1253 (2007) Lillian INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Michael J. Astrue, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-14602. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 23, 2007. *1254 *1255 *1256

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Murphree, who is white, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration (the “Agency”) in his employment-discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Murphree is long-term employee with the Agency who, at the time of the events giving rise to this case, was a District Man

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Doris Bailey, Redditt Hudson, F. Willis Johnson, and the Missouri State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“MO NAACP”) bring suit against Defendants Ferguson-Florissant School District (“FFSD” or “the District”) and the St. Louis County Board of Elections Commissioners (“St. Lo

419 F.Supp.2d 1336 (2006) Myron ALLENSTEIN, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF Harold SMALL, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV.A.02 G 0583 M. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Middle Division. March 13, 2006. Myron K. Allenstein, Allenstein & Associates, Gadsden, AL, for Plaintiff. Edward Q. Ra

OPINION AND ORDER Debra M. Brown, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Education, holding that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.” 347 U.S. 483, 495, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“Brown I”). A year later, on May "31, 1955, the Supreme' Court i

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 06-2368 ________________ Kathy Davison, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on several motions to dismiss: (1) Defendants Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc. (“Greenhorne”), Thomas Copeland (“Copeland”), Evelyn Jones, and Daniel Jones’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Local Rule 7 (Docket No. 7); (2) Defendant City of Chesapeake, Virg

50 F.Supp.2d 1176 (1999) Jeffery HARDY, Plaintiff, v. The TOWN OF HAYNEVILLE, Chief Edward Boyd, in his official and individual capacities, Clete Davis, in his official and individual capacities, and Mayor Joe Eddie Morgan, in his official and individual capacities, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-A-86-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. April 1, 1999.</

OPINION * SKELTON, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is a civilian pay case in which the discharged employee, Richard Schlegel, is entitled to the benefits of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 387, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 851 et seq. Prior to his removal on July 31,

787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,

490 F.3d 648 Kathy DAVISON, Appellant,v.CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA; Rocco Forte, in his individual and official capacities, Appellees. No. 06-2368. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 12, 2007. Filed: June 20, 2007. Counsel who presented argument on behalf

MEMORANDUM OPINION GUIN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs in the above-styled cause are public entities organized and located in Alabama that purchase repackaged chlorine for the treatment of drinking water, sewage, and swimming pools. Defendant chemical com*1509panies either distribute or repackage chlorine1

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff Judy Lynn Culver (“Ms. Culver”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006), Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. She seeks review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), who denied her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Suppl

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff David Earl Watkins (“Mr. Watkins”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006), Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. He seeks review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), who denied his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”)

574 F.Supp. 1280 (1983) Sylvester J. VAUGHNS, Jr., etc., et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, et al. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, et al. Civ. Nos. 72-325-K, K-81-5297. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 20, 1983. Order September 20,