Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Carolyn E. Demarest, J. “Second third-party defendants” Hi-Lume Corporation (motion sequence [MS] 18), Maspeth Steel Fabricators, Inc. (MS19), M&D Fire Door (M&D Installers) (MS20), Roz-A-Lite Electrical Contracting, Inc. (MS21), Williamsburg Parquet Flooring Co. (MS22), Dynamic Sheet Metal Ltd. (MS23), KNS Building Restorations, Inc. (KNS Building) (MS24), Capitol Fire Sprinkler

423 B.R. 6 (2010) In the Matter of INFLIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC., Debtor. R. Kenneth Barnard, Esq., Trustee of Inflight Newspapers, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Josh Joffe a/k/a Joshua E. Joffe, a/k/a Joshua Joffe and Deborah Joffe a/k/a Debbie J. Joffe, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 807-71796-reg. Adversary No. 8-08-08166-reg. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. January 6, 2010

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiffs Brian Bee (“Bee” or “plaintiff’) and Donna Bee (“D. Bee”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring this products liability action against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis,” “NPC,” or “defendant”), alleging that Novartis’s drugs Zometa and Aredia, prescribed to Bee as part of a regimen to treat his ankylosing spondylitis, osteoporos

205 B.R. 682 (1997) In re LOLLIPOP, INC. a/k/a Palm-G Distributors, Debtor. Roy BABITT, as Trustee of the estate of Lollipop, Inc. a/k/a Palm-G Distributors, Plaintiff, v. Erika SCHWARTZ, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 194-15319-260, Adv. No. 195-1054-260. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. March 7, 1997. *683

14 Cal.4th 1090 (1997) THE PEOPLE ex rel. JOAN R. GALLO, as City Attorney, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARLOS ACUNA et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S046980. Supreme Court of California. January 30, 1997. *1099 COUNSEL Amitai Schwartz, Antonio Ponvert III, Sara T. Campos, Edward M. Chen, Alan L. Schloss

303 B.R. 688 (2004) In re MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Debtors. Malden Mills Industries, Inc., et al., and the official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Alfred G. Maroun, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. BAP Nos. MW 03-003 to 03-009, 03-020, 03-022. Bankruptcy Nos. 01-47214-JBR to 01-47217-JBR. Adversary No. 02-4248-JBR. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendants Larry Goldstone and Clarence G. Simmons and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed May 21, 2012 (Doc. 35)(“Goldstone & Simmons MTD”); (ii) the Defendant Jane Starrett’s Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of P

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 3 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 4 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISP

79 F.Supp.2d 110 (1997) FIDELITY FUNDING OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and Fidelity Funding Financial Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Isaac REINHOLD, et. al., Defendants. No. 95-CV-3130(ARR)CLP. United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 22, 1997. *111 *112 *113

9 A.3d 882 (2010) 204 N.J. 320 Lula M. HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Hon. Clark E. Bruno, Acting Commissioner of Human Services; Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital; Gregory P. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer for Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital, Defendants-Respondents. A-69 September Term 2009. Supreme Court of New Jersey.

FINAL ORDER APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS; OVERRULING PERRYMAN’S OBJECTIONS ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. On January 28, 2013, this Court heard plaintiffs Josué Romero, Gina Bailey, Jennifer Lawler, John Walters, Daniel Cox, Christopher Dickey, Grant Jenkins, and Bradley Berentson’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

HOFFMAN, Judge: Appellants contend that the trial court erred (1) in refusing to grant a new trial because the verdict was against the weight of the evidence; (2) in permitting appellee to ask prejudicial questions concerning the absence of reflectors and lights and in charging the jury erroneously on their absence; (3) in using the term legal cause in its charge; and (4) in refusing to grant a new trial because the verdicts

180 B.R. 851 (1995) In re MIDWAY AIRLINES, INC., Midway Airlines (1987), Inc., Midway Aircraft Engineering, Inc., Debtors. Sheldon L. SOLOW, Trustee of Midway Airlines, Inc., Midway Airlines (1987), Inc., and Midway Aircraft Engineering, Inc., Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants, v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Counterplaintiff. Bankruptcy Nos. 91 B 06449, 91 B 06450 and 91 B 06451. Adv. No. 91 A 01176.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above

*1036WILKEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs in this action are two newspaper-publishing corporations;1 twelve individual journalists;2 and the “Reporters’ Committee for Freedom of the Press,” a legal research and defense fund organization established to protect the in

*1061ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ • MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On January 17, 2014, Ben Z. Halberstam filed this putative class action on his own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated Californians against NJOY, Inc., and -Sottera, Inc. (collectively, “NJOY”).1

PER CURIAM. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions of law certified to the Court of Appeals as questions of law which ought to he reviewed by said court-: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Charles B. Alexander? (2) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Henry M. Ale