⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Galvan v. Commissioner of Social Security”

Galvan v. Barnhartpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 92 F. App'x 476
MEMORANDUM * The determination of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that Florentino M. Galvan (“Galvan”) was not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income under 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, 1381-1383c, was supported by substantial evidence. The ALJ reasonably gave controlling weight to Dr. MacKenzie’s opinion and less weight to Dr. Nolan’s opinion based on Dr. MacKenzie’s long t
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2010-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 429 B.R. 846; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1700; 2010 WL 1995834
429 B.R. 846 (2010) In re Michael C. BOUYEA, Debtor, Michael C. Bouyea, Plaintiff v. Social Security Administration, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-27953PM. Adversary No. 09-0739PM. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Greenbelt. May 18, 2010. *847 Laura J. Margulies, Seth W. Diamond, Laura Margulies & Associates
District Court, S.D. New York · 1971-04-12 · Published · cited 7× · 324 F. Supp. 1016; 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13789
OPINION TYLER, District Judge. Vicente Galvan and Marcelino Torres, plaintiffs, have brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to redress the alleged violation of rights secured to them by the Constitution of the United States. Asserting jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), (4), plaintiffs contend that the denial by the defendant, the Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, of unemp
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000-09-19 · Published · cited 2× · 254 B.R. 675; 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1287; 2000 WL 1634151
254 B.R. 675 (2000) In re Robert J. PERRY, Debtor. Robert J. Perry, Plaintiff, v. Division of Child Support Enforcement Department of Social Services Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-70101-S. Adversary No. 00-7011-S. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. September 19, 2000. *676
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001-07-11 · Published · cited 80× · 63 S.W.3d 734; 2001 Tenn. App. LEXIS 485
63 S.W.3d 734 (2001) STATE of Tennessee ex rel. COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION v. MEDICINE BIRD BLACK BEAR WHITE EAGLE, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. July 11, 2001. Permission to Appeal Denied December 10, 2001. *741 Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Michael Moore, Solicitor General, for ap
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1279 BRIAN HUSSEY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE; CHRISTINE ELOW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Cambridge Police Department, Defendants, Appellees, BRANVILLE G. BARD, JR., in his individual capacity, Defendant.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975-12-03 · Published · cited 16× · 528 F.2d 1084; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11660
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by the Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare from an order of the District Court for Vermont granting intervening plaintiff’s motion for class action designation and also for summary judgment to the extent of declaring that Vermont was bound to give a trial-type hearing and to continue payments pending the outcome o
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0946 (CKK) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0952 (CKK) DO
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021-09-27 · Published · cited 6× · 496 P.3d 430
496 P.3d 430The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-10-05 · Published · cited 36× · 50 F.4th 498
Case: 21-40680 Document: 00516498357 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2022 N
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981-05-13 · Published · cited 184× · 649 F.2d 134; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13300
649 F.2d 134 Maria DOE and Cruz Doe, individually and on behalf of theirminor son Manuel Doe, Plaintiffs,andAnna Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES et al., Defendants,andCatholic Home Bureau, Defendant-Appellee. No. 464, Docket 80-7531. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Dec. 4, 1980.D
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987-10-09 · Published · cited 8× · 670 F. Supp. 1121; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9205
670 F.Supp. 1121 (1987) Jane DOE v. UNITED SOCIAL AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al. Michael J. YEAGER, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Theresa Ann Yeager v. Richard J. REDDINGTON, et al. Civ. Nos. H-85-258 (PCD), H-85-624 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 9, 1987. *1122 Hubert J.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 10× · 878 F.3d 662
OPINION PER CURIAM: For the third time, we are called upon to assess the legality of the President’s efforts to bar over 150 million nationals of six designated countries 1 from entering the United States or being issued immigrant visas that they w
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-50149 Document: 441-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/24/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 24, 2026
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-06-12 · Published · cited 3× · 859 F.3d 741; 2017 WL 2529640; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10356
OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 22 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH; No. 17-17168 JOHN DOES, 1 & 2; MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF HAWAII, INC., D.C. No.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH; No. 17-17168 JOHN DOES, 1 & 2; MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF HAWAII,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 22 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH; No. 17-17168 JOHN DOES, 1 & 2; MUSLIM ASSOCIATION OF HAWAII, INC., D.C. No.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 4825837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM