Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA FORD MOTOR WARRANTY CASES. S279969 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B312261 Los Angeles County Superior Court JCCP No. 4856 July 3, 2025 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justices Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins, and Evans concurred.

Filed 6/26/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ROSANNA MONTEMAYOR et al., B320477 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. v. No. 19STCV37946) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Cour

336 S.W.3d 833 (2011) PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP k/n/a Prestige Ford Garland, LLC and PFG Acquisition Corp., Appellants, v. Maria T. MORALES, Appellee. No. 05-09-00211-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 4, 2011. Rehearing Overruled May 10, 2011. *834 Kathryn L. Shilling, Dallas, TX, for A

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

6/17/2022 11:38:11 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 20-322.pdf 20-322_new.pdf versus 32 pages (195 KB) 32 pages

200 F.Supp.2d 670 (2002) Caprice KENT, Individually and as guardian, parent, and next friend of the minor, Mallaree Kent, and the State of Mississippi, Office of the Governor, Division of Medicaid Plaintiffs v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Trace City Ford, Lincoln Mercury, Inc, and Natchez Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. Defendants No. CIV.A. 5:01CV379BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Divis

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00007-CV NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 126th District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court No. D-1-GN-17-004072 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VIRTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2308 (CKK) MERRICK GARLAND, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 22, 2021) Virtus Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Virtus”) is a “virtual” drug manufacturer. As part o

170 S.W.3d 272 (2005) US BANK, N.A., formerly known as Firstar Bank, N.A., Appellant v. PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and STV Incorporated, Appellees. No. 05-03-01641-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 26, 2005. *274 S. Cass Weiland, Jennifer L. Keefe, Patton Boggs L.L.P., Dallas, for Appellant. Jame

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 15-0591 444444444444 IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, WARDLAW CLAIMS SERVICE, INC. AND IDEAL ADJUSTING, INC., RELATORS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 44444444444444444444444444

955 F.Supp. 667 (1996) ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. Civil Action No. 96-2511. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. December 17, 1996. *668 Michael D. Hislop, Bolen Erwin & Johnson, Ltd., P.L.C., Alexandria, LA, for Allstate Insurance Co. Robert William Maxwell, J. Jeff

215 S.W.3d 145 (2006) Lance SCOTT, Appellant-Respondent, v. BLUE SPRINGS FORD SALES, INC., Respondent-Appellant, Robert C. Balderston, Respondent. No. WD 64428. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 21, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied January 30, 2007. Application for Transfer Denied March 20, 2007.

Robert L. Brown, Justice. Two issues are raised by the appellants, Ford Motor Company and Quality Ford, Inc., in this appeal: 1) whether the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict due to the absence of a reasonable basis for the expert’s opinion presented on behalf of the appellee, Dean Massey; and 2) whether the trial judge further erred in refusing to

ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 7:25 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

ACCEPTED 15-25-00123-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/25/2025 5:17 PM NO. 15-25-00123-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

OPINION CHARLES KREGER, Justice This is an appeal from a dispute between appellant, The Note Investment Group, Inc. (“TNIG”), and appellee, Associates First Capital Corp., successor by merger to Associates Financial Services Company, Inc. (“Associates”), regarding the sale by TNIG of partial interests in certain seller-financed- notes and contracts for de

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ELENA NACARINO; MEGAN No. 22-15377 TAYLOR, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellants, 07036-VC v. OPINION KASHI COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. MOLLY BROWN; ADINA No. 22-15658 RINGLER; CHRISTIAN LEMUS, D.C. No.

OP ALA, Justice: The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the evidence supports an award of actual and punitive damages where a secured creditor repossessed collateral in the erroneous belief that the debtor was in default.1 We answer this question in the affirmative. In separate transactions a short time apart Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell [debtor] purchased two farm tractors on cr

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Through the exercise of our diversity jurisdiction, federal courts have interpreted Mississippi strict products liability law in a manner that is not justified either by Mississippi state court precedents or generally accepted strict products liability doctrine. These federal decisions lead the majority to uphold the district court’s conclusion that the danger presented by t

NO. 12-09-00291-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT