Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 102 Larry G. Lillback appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Metropolitan Life Insurance on both of Lillback's claims. In the first branch of his complaint, Lillback alleged that he relied on Metropolitan's representations to him that he could draft wills and trusts for clients as well as sell the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2015 Term FILED _______________ June 16, 2015 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPE

The opinion of the court was delivered by Swayze, J. This case is similar, in one aspect, to Hanrahan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 43 Vroom 504. In that case, however, it was not necessary to decide whether a plea setting up a warranty that the assured had not been under the care of a physician was sustained by proof that the assured had been attended by a physician within th

The opinion of the court was delivered by Swayze, J. This is an action on a policy of life insurance. One of the pleas averred that the assured in bis application for insurance warranted that be had- not within fifteen years previous to the signing of the application been under the care of any physician, and that the statement warranted was false. The exact language of the application material to the case is

The opinion of the court was delivered by Pitney, J. This is an action upon a policy of insurance issued December 4th, 1899, by the defendant below (now *386plaintiff in error) upon the life of John W. Dimick, payable, in ease of his death, to his wife, Bridget, who was the plaintiff below. The insured died January 24th, 1900. After a trial and. verdict up

83 Wn.2d 523 (1974) 520 P.2d 162 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. WASHINGTON LIFE AND DISABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION et al., Respondents. No. 42757. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. March 21, 1974. Bogle, Gates, Dobrin, Wakefield & Long and Ronald T. Schaps, John C. Coughenour, and M

952 A.2d 1077 (2008) 196 N.J. 251 Michael PIZZULLO and Dorothea Pizzullo, h/w, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. A-21 September Term 2007 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 4, 2008. Decided August 7, 2008. *1079 Gerald R.

*311The opinion of the court was delivered by Fort, J. The defence in this case was based upon an alleged breach of warranty. The effort on the part of the defendant was to show that the insured had answered certain questions in such a way as to cause the breach. Forfeitures are not favored in the law, and, if by any intendment, a ground can be found to

[1] The petition and amendment of the plaintiff are in the form for an action to cancel a policy of insurance on the ground that it was procured by false and fraudulent representations. The policy bore date of April 20, 1932, and, among other things, it is alleged in plaintiff's petition that the policyholder committed suicide on the 26th day of February, 1934. The defendant filed an answer to plaintiff's petition, in which she made numerous admissions and denials, and allege

Mr. Justice Niemeyer delivered the opinion of the court. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered against it in favor of fifteen plaintiffs — beneficiaries under a like number of life insurance policies issued by the Lafayette Mutual Benefit Association (hereafter called the Lafayette) and reinsured conditionally by the Jefferson National Life Insurance Company (hereafter calle

The opinion of the court was delivered by VooRHEES, J. This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court. The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the trucking business and its president is Thomas Orr. The suit is on a policy of indemnity, called a theft or burglary policy, whereby the defendant agreed to indemnify Thomas Orr during a certain period subject to certain “special and general agreements, terms and con

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. This is a commercial dispute between companies that buy and sell propane gas. Plaintiff Lakes Gas Company claims Defendant Clark Oil Trading Company converted propane that belonged to Lakes. Alternatively, it contends Clark Oil was unjustly enriched and must pay the value of the propane that Clark Oil received. Clark Oil denies that it is

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. Before the court are the following: *12501. Defendants’ motion for summary-judgment (Doc. 121); 2. Plaintiffs’ response (Doc. 132); and 3. Defendant’s reply (Doc. 137).

Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER John W. Lungstrum, United States District Judge This patent infringement case was tried to a jury in this Court from February 13, 2017, through March 3, 2017. By its verdict, the jury found the following: that Time Warner Cable1 infringed each of the *1138asserted claims of the five Sprint paten

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J., dissenting. {¶ 35} I respectfully dissent. In this case, our power of review is limited: we must only decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in creating a statewide class action on behalf of individuals asserting injuries allegedly arising from use of the painkiller OxyContin. Baughman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 480, 483, 727 N.E.2d

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0308p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AUSTIN CHRISTIAN GRIFFITH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, │ │

*1220 BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. The issue in this case is whether a trust company becomes liable to the holder of an individual retirement account when the company responds to a federal tax levy against the account by liquidating the mutual fund shares in the account and remitting the cash proceeds to th

CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW MEMORANDUM OPINION Jasper Lee Vick, an inmate of the South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) in Clifton, Tennessee, brings this pro se, in forma pauperis action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Core Civic, Corrections Care of America (CCA), the Tenness