Cases

732 F.Supp.2d 809 (2010) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. SHELBOURNE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. and Garrett Kelleher, Defendants. No. 09 C 4963. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 18, 2010. *814 Matthew K. Organ, Steven A. Levy, Goldberg Kohn Bell Black Rosenbloom & Moritz, Ltd., Chicago, I

GARRETT, J. The defendant, Ernest J. Green, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment finding him liable for a credit card debt of almost $15,000. We affirm the trial court judgment. FACTS On December 19, 2016, Bank of America, N.A., as successor-in-interest of FIA Card Services, N.A., filed suit against the defendant, alleging that he owed $14,979.26 on a credit account. It also filed a

It is common practice among district judges in this circuit to make such a statement and adopt the magistrate judges' recommended dispositions when they find that magistrate judges have dealt with the issues fully and accurately and that they could add little of value to that analysis. We cannot interpret the district court's statement as establishing that it failed to perform the required de novo review. In re Griego<

KAREN GREN SCHOLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Defendants'1 Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 92]. For the reasons below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. *617I. BACKGROUND A. The Federal Benefit Payment System

Judge POOLER concurs in a separate opinion. KATZMANN, Chief Judge: We are called upon in this case to address the role of a district court in monitoring the implementation of a deferred prosecution agreement. In December 2012, plaintiff-appellant the United States entered into a five-year deferred prosecution agreement (the “DPA”) with defendants-appellants HSBC Holdings pic and HSBC Bank, USA, N.A. (coll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COROPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Civil Action No. 17-cv-36-LLA-MAU v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION1 After the 2008 financial

MEMORANDUM & ORDER CARLOS MURGUIA, United States District Judge This matter comes before the court upon defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. 9) and plaintiff Erie David Keller’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 11). I. Plaintiff’s motion to remand Plaintiff seeks to remand this case to the District Court of Do

MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert E. Nugent, United States Bankruptcy Judge If ever a bank asked to be sued, this is it. Bank of America’s (BOA’s) conduct in *431“administering” the mortgage loan modifications sought and granted to the plaintiffs in this ease reflects, at best, utter disarray in its home loan operations. It is the sort of non-re

OPINION CHIN, District Judge. Before this Court are thirty cases relating to the merger of Bank of America Corporation (“BofA”) with Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) and public disclosures made in connection with the transaction. These putative class actions include: (1) actions based on alleged violations of the securities laws, including Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange

2025 IL App (1st) 241333 First District Third Division June 18, 2025 No. 1-24-1333 ) BMO BANK N.A., )

505 F.Supp.2d 321 (2007) Kurt G. SCHLEGEL, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. Civil No. 3:07cv00022. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. June 12, 2007. *322 *323 Kurt G. Schlegel, Charlottesville, VA, pro se. Megan Conway Rahman, Stephen A

205 P.3d 698 (2009) ESTATE OF Ethel F. DRAPER, deceased, Appellee, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Trustee of the Ethel F. Draper Irrevocable Voluntary Trust Agreement Dated April 8, 1982, Appellee/Cross-appellee, First Christian Church of Olathe, Kansas, Appellant, Janis M. Waleski Murphy and Mary H. Moeller, Appellees/Cross-appellants, UMB Bank, N.A., American Cancer Society Heartland Div., and Olathe Medical CTR, Appellees.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 633 OPINION We review the granting of a summary judgment in favor of, cross-defendant and respondent Bank of America, N.A. (BofA), on the cross-complaint of appellant AmerUS Life Insurance Company (AmerUS) alleging a conversion cause of action. The underlying lawsuit arose out of a fraud perpetr

792 A.2d 312 (2002) 143 Md. App. 1 Jeff E. MESSING, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. No. 2646, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 28, 2002. *314 Jeff E. Messing, Appellant, pro se. Dennis P. McGlone and Brian L. Moffet (Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, LL

Ellen L. Hollander, United States District Judge Plaintiff Meghan Stone filed suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo," or the "Bank"). ECF 1-3 (the "Complaint"). She alleges, inter alia , that defendant improperly took funds from her account, in violation of the terms of the service agreement (ECF 5-2, the "Agreement") for her account. ECF 1-3. Wells Fargo removed

Opinion EPSTEIN, P. J. —Bank of New York Mellon appeals from the judgment of dismissal of its lawsuit against respondent Citibank, N.A. The case arose out of the simultaneous refinancing of a home equity line of credit by two different lenders in 2006, which resulted in a dispute over the priority of their recorded deeds of trust. Appellant challenges

422 F.Supp.2d 889 (2006) Ronald E. FISHER, Jr., Plaintiff, v. MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A., Defendant. No. CS-05-515. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 27, 2006. *890 *891 Michael D. Slodov, Javitch Block & Rathbone LLP, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant. <

*698 GROSS, J. As a result of a fraudulent scheme, two banks took possession of nearly identical promissory notes secured by the same mortgage. The underlying transaction contemplated just one note. After payments stopped, both banks sought to foreclose. The question before us asks which bank may proceed?

16‐308(L) United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _________________________ August Term, 2016 (Argued: March 1, 2017 Decided: July 12, 2017)

740 F.Supp.2d 457 (2010) Thomas "Snuff" GARRETT, individually and d/b/a Garrett Music Enterprises, Plaintiffs, v. MUSIC PUBLISHING COMPANY OF AMERICA, LLC, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 5627(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 17, 2010. *459 David Nathan Tarlow, Coggan & Tarlow, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.