⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gary Brockington”

Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010-12-17 · Published · cited 5× · 10 A.3d 168; 417 Md. 332; 2010 Md. LEXIS 762
RAKER, J. dissenting, joined by HARRELL and RODOWSKY, JJ. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the Court of Special Appeals and affirm the judgments of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. I would hold that, under the particular circumstances of this case, the Circuit Court did not err by allowing two alternate jurors to be present during jury deliberations in this civil case (after be
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007-09-07 · Published · cited 8× · 933 A.2d 426; 176 Md. App. 327; 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 108
933 A.2d 426 (2007) 176 Md. App. 327 McNeal BROCKINGTON v. Joyce GRIMSTEAD. No. 58, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 7, 2007. Reconsideration Denied November 6, 2007. *427 Jessica L. Ellsworth, Washington, DC (Mark D. Gately, on brief), Baltimore, for appel
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 724 So. 2d 694; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 499; 1999 WL 22586
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See General Accident Insurance Company v. Taplis, 493 So.2d 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012-10-15 · Published · cited 13× · 291 Ga. 683; 733 S.E.2d 269; 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3121; 2012 WL 4856991; 2012 Ga. LEXIS 777
Melton, Justice, concurring specially. While I agree with the ultimate conclusion reached by the majority, I write separately to focus on the core issues that need to be resolved, rather than parse every argument made by the parties and the Court of Appeals. Specifically, in order to address the issue of standing, we need only decide what the Legislature intended to include as the eight-m
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922-04-26 · Published · cited 13× · 112 S.E. 94; 119 S.C. 273; 1922 S.C. LEXIS 68
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice; Cothran. Action to have a deed declared to be la mortgage. Decree below from plaintiff, and defendant appeals. The controversy arises out of the following facts: On June 12, 1914, the plaintiff, Brockington, owed the defendant, Lynch, the sum of $14,196.32, evidenced by three notes secured by mortgages, then past due,
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 36× · 298 Ga. 221; 780 S.E.2d 311
BENHAM, Justice. **221 These matters come to us from our grant of applications for interlocutory review. At issue are two lower court orders: an order lifting a stay and allowing for the filing of a dispossessory action and an order deciding the validity of several substantive issues on su
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2022-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DENNIS L. SMITH, § § No. 201, 2021 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below–Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § THE ESTATE OF JAMES
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-06-06 · Published · cited 19× · 894 F.3d 1221
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This is an enforcement action brought by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" *1224or "Commission") against LabMD, Inc., alleging that LabMD's data-security program was inadequate and thus constituted an "unfair act or practice" under Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the "FTC Act" or
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974-11-20 · Published · cited 7× · 328 A.2d 828; 459 Pa. 286; 1974 Pa. LEXIS 472
459 Pa. 286 (1974) 328 A.2d 828 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Gary Andrew JONES, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted November 8, 1973. Decided November 20, 1974. *287 *288 Ronald J. Brockington, Philadelphia, for appellant. Maxine J. Stotland, A
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-05-09 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE YES CHANCELLOR FARMS, LLC, ) No. ED111217 ) Plaintiff/Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Jefferson County v. ) Cause No. 22JE-AC01292-01
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989-03-21 · Published · cited 15× · 709 F. Supp. 1563; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2721; 1989 WL 26202
709 F.Supp. 1563 (1989) Deborah SWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. ATHENS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 87-06-ATH(DF). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Athens Division. March 21, 1989. *1564 *1565 *1566 Mary M. Brockington, A. Jack Hi
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006-07-14 · Published · cited 10× · 439 F. Supp. 2d 1294; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56100; 2006 WL 2089771
439 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2006) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA, INC., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of *1295 Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, I
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE M.S. Bracely-Mosley, ) No. ED110687 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County v. ) Cause No. 18SL-CC01164
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005-10-18 · Published · cited 9× · 406 F. Supp. 2d 1326; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26222; 2005 WL 3556181
406 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2005) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Inc., through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., and the following qualified and regist
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2018-03-17 · Published · cited 2× · 301 F. Supp. 3d 1297
W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE *1302This case is a challenge to the method of electing members of the Board of Education in Sumter County, Georgia. (Doc. 1.). The plaintiff, Mathis Kearse Wright, Jr., contends that the current election plan's two at-large seats and high concentration of African-American voters in Districts 1 and 5 dilute African-
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007-09-06 · Published · cited 9× · 504 F. Supp. 2d 1333; 2007 WL 7600409; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68950
504 F.Supp.2d 1333 (2007) COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc., The Central Presbyterian Outreach and Advocacy Center, Inc., Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Inc., The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), through its Georgia State Conference of Branches, Georgia Legislative Black Caucus, Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc., Bertha B. Young, and Eugene Taylor, Plaintif
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989-02-03 · Published · cited 14× · 705 F. Supp. 1556; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1101; 1989 WL 9075
705 F.Supp. 1556 (1989) Deborah SWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. ATHENS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 87-06-ATH(DF). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Athens Division. February 3, 1989. *1557 Mary M. Brockington, John C. Butters, A. Jack Hinton, Douglas R. Powell, McGee & Oxford, Atlanta, Ga., James F.
Com. v. Moore, W.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-10-12 · Published · cited 20× · 2021 Pa. Super. 202; 263 A.3d 1193
J-S11044-21 2021 PA Super 202 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : WILLIAM MOORE, III :
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-01-23 · Published · cited 2× · 91 F.4th 238
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1351 Doc: 70 Filed: 01/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1351 MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC.; FIELD TRADERS LLC; CINDY’S HOT SHOTS, INC.; PASADENA ARMS, LLC; WORTH-A-SHOT, INC.,
Brice v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 5× · 225 Md. App. 666; 126 A.3d 246; 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 163
WOODWARD, J. Jovan Maurice Brice, appellant, was arrested on August 2, 2011, and charged with illegal possession of a regulated firearm. On July 18, 2014, appellant was convicted of that charge after a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County. Thereafter, appellant was sentenced to five years in prison, with all but three ye